The medicalisation net

Here's a list of methods by which the net can be widened.

   1.

   *Normal processes of growth and ageing are labelled as disseases. *The
   availability of drugs to treat erectile dysfunction (impotence) in men is a
   very well-known event in drug discovery. This is particularly true in the
   behavioural sciences, where traits like shyness, frugality, and the like
   are now included as disorders worth correcting with drugs.
   2.

   *Mild symptoms of self-limiting disease being labelled as harbingers of
   serious problems.* The irritable bowel syndrome is one of the most
   common problems that a specialist gastroenterologist sees in their daily
   practice. For the majority, it is a mild disorder that only requires
   reassurance regarding its benign nature. The arrival of new drugs has been
   accompanied by efforts to repackage the condition as one deserving
   attention and drug treatment in every case.
   3.

   *Personal and social problems are being recast as medical conditions.* A
   flood of drugs is now available for treating behavioural disorders like
   depression, anxiety attacks, social phobias, and impaired attention and
   learning abilities in children. Some, no doubt, benefit from these drugs,
   but the danger lies in being too quick to start people on drug treatment
   without making an attempt to identify and modify social and emotional
   factors that could be the trigger for many mild forms of the problem.
   Shyness is now a disease!
   4.

   *Risk is recast as a disease.* Most people, doctors included, confuse
   risk with cause; drug marketers cash in on this flaw in reasoning.
   Osteoporosis (loss of bone mass) in women who have entered the menopause is
   inevitable. Osteoporosis is a risk for bone fractures in women, not the
   cause. A climate of fear is created by vigorous promotion of the
   consequences of bone fractures in older women. The promotion of drugs for
   the reduction of osteoporosis draws attention away from promoting simpler
   interventions such as dietary supplementation and regular exercise.
   5.

   *Extending the boundaries of treatable disease.* The cut-off for the
   definition of high blood pressure has been slowly pushed downwards to the
   point where any figure above the well-known "120/80 mm Hg" is now labelled
   as abnormal and worthy of attention. Similarly, the borderline for fasting
   blood sugar has been set at 100 mg. There is no clear evidence of benefit
   from starting treatment at such low levels.
   6.

   *The medicalization of dying.* We have lost the capacity to accept death
   and suffering as meaningful and inevitable aspects of life. Dying has been
   taken away from the family, to the hospital, and to the medical fraternity.

*Downside.* Promoting therapies with dubious benefits causes a lot of harm.
There is an ever-present risk of side effects from drugs, many of which may
not become apparent until a few years after the remedy has been marketed.
The direct economic burden is obvious; the indirect losses from the
diversion of funds to unnecessary regimens are less so. Patients are
emotionally burdened by being labelled as diseased. Society as a whole is
distracted from the task of looking deeper into social factors that might
be the cause of the problem.

*Thus spake Prof. Gøtzsche.* Professor Peter C. Gøtzsche, a Danish
physician, researcher, and outspoken critic of unsavoury practices within
the pharmaceutical industry, has made several recommendations to prevent
overdiagnosis and medicalization in healthcare. Here are six of them.

   1.

   *Use fewer drugs.* Gøtzsche often emphasises the dangers of polypharmacy
   (taking multiple drugs) and recommends a reduction in the overall
   consumption of drugs.
   2.

   *Be cautious with preventive interventions.* Many medical interventions
   are preventive and can lead to overdiagnosis. Gøtzsche recommends a more
   conservative approach to preventive medicine.
   3.

   *Avoid industry-funded trials.* He warns about the potential biases and
   distortions in drug trials funded by pharmaceutical companies. He
   recommends relying more on independently funded research.
   4.

   *Implement better training for doctors.* Gøtzsche believes doctors
   should receive better education on the risks and benefits of

   treatments and the potential for overdiagnosis.
   5.

   *Promote transparency in research.* He emphasises the importance of
   access to complete clinical trial data and encourages the sharing of all
   results (both positive and negative) to avoid biassed reporting.
   6.

   *Strengthen patient information and involvement.* Gøtzsche believes
   patients should be better informed about the risks and benefits of
   treatments, allowing them to make more informed decisions about their
   healthcare.

These recommendations reflect his concerns about the undue influence of the
pharmaceutical industry on healthcare practices as well as the broader
issue of medicalisation, where normal life processes and conditions are
treated as medical problems.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 14:51
Subject: Fw: medicalisation
To:



{P}rescription - #8
<https://p4life.substack.com/p/prescription-8?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2>

{P}rescription - #8

Arjun Rajagopalan

8 November, 2023
<https://p4life.substack.com/p/prescription-8?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooeSekE02PBeC9mc1dOfmYDm1BgxpstjL4TNHgaSnFOqQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to