Good points. But alas In a day or 2 another brother of his plus one more or the top brass will speak against ; virtually, law real and the consciousness aare unfathomable. KR IRS 1224
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 04:18, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]> wrote: > > I happened to read the judgement > https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/senthilkumar-v-govt-of-tn-519266.pdf > > A couple of thoughts: > The main thrust of the case seems to be the right of a citizen to access > a public space. > The judge has pointed out that religious spaces are not included in > Article 15. > The next point that occurred to me is the purpose of the access demanded. > It is clear that when the space is meant for a particular purpose the > entry will also require that the person wanting to enter has the same > purpose. > No one can demand that since a govt office is a public space he should be > allowed entry to hold a tea party there. Even a public space has an owner > in law who has the power to restrict entry. > Many of the cathedrals where non Christians are allowed is only for the > purpose of viewing the architecture and not for participating in the > prayers conducted there. Actually churches are privately owned public > spaces to which entry can be restricted. > In Muslim spaces even women are not allowed > One more difference between Hinduism and others is that we do not have > congregational worship. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqZHQhf6TSAGroDYXxpvzJ%3D1NPOdB8gkhpbOTLsrp3a%2BA%40mail.gmail.com.
