PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING
The question you're posing seems to be about whether in the modern world,
there can be instances where good perception and understanding may not
exist? Indeed, it's possible for various factors to impede or distort
perception and understanding, even in contemporary society. Let's explore
some reasons why this might be the case:
Information Overload: In today's digital age, we are bombarded with an
overwhelming amount of information from various sources, including social
media, news outlets, and websites. Sorting through this flood of
information can be challenging, leading to confusion and misinformation.(AS
YOU SAID)
Misleading Media: Media outlets sometimes prioritize sensationalism over
accuracy, leading to biased or incomplete portrayals of events. This can
distort people's perceptions and understanding of important issues.
Confirmation Bias: People often seek out information that confirms their
existing beliefs and ignore or discount evidence that contradicts them. This
tendency can prevent individuals from fully understanding complex topics
and engaging in productive discourse.{WE DO HAVE EXAMPLES HERE ITSELF}
Polarization and Tribalism: Society is increasingly polarized along
political, social, and cultural lines. This polarization can lead to "us
vs. them" mentalities, making it difficult for people to empathize with
those who hold different viewpoints and inhibiting constructive dialogue
and understanding.
Lack of Critical Thinking Skills: Many individuals may lack the
necessary critical thinking skills to evaluate information critically and
discern fact from fiction. Without these skills, it's challenging to form
accurate perceptions and understanding of the world.
Language and Communication Barriers: In a globalized world, language
and communication barriers can hinder effective perception and
understanding between individuals and cultures, leading to
misunderstandings and misinterpretations.
Complexity of Modern Issues: Many of the challenges facing the world
today, such as climate change, economic inequality, and technological
advancements, are incredibly complex and multifaceted. Understanding these
issues requires nuanced thinking and interdisciplinary perspectives, which
can be difficult to achieve.
Despite these challenges, it's important to recognize that good
perception and understanding are still attainable goals. By fostering
critical thinking skills, promoting empathy and open-mindedness, and
encouraging dialogue and collaboration, individuals and societies can work
towards achieving greater clarity and insight into the world around them.
Hence phase one action is in our hands; we have to segregate such
element causing injury, so boldly asking them to get out; and we shall also
ask the main leaders , so called, patronising such negative perception as
party and group members, evincing misplace sympathy; for that you shall cll
the action wrong boldly; when you are not alert, all your writing goes to
the waste-water only. We cannot change the SUN but only can study; but we
can change the earth, by changing your attitude bold and not performing the
midway levels of advises. Without being bold how do you expect changes
within the text? KR IRS 5224/
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 22:17, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> *Mar*The Horizon of Perception and Understanding
>
>
>
> Suppose from LKG on you are drilled with the basic paradigm that you are
> part of nature, part of the planet Earth, part of the Solar System, part of
> the Milkyway, and part of the Universe. Suppose you are taught that
> education means the continuous expansion of the horizon of perception and
> understanding, starting with the local topography and expanding the arena
> of feeling as understanding, through every method of physical, emotional,
> hormonal and mental exercise. Automatically one understands that infinity
> means the infinity of paths of perception and understanding, all as self
> perception and self understanding. The very dictionary meaning of infinity
> becomes the infinity of perceptions and understandings.
>
> As one is continuously expanding one’s own self concept, one simply
> cannot cling to the safety and preservation of the immediate self body as
> self identity. One dares and courage becomes the hormonal communication
> routine. The symbiotic daring becomes learning via feeling the revelations
> of nature.
>
> And one cannot indulge in the Cartesian torture and murder of nature, and
> bluff to self and others that it is great education. Living becomes
> learning and expanding the arena of rapture of the Biosphere, where every
> life form becomes one’s own limb. In fact the internal hormonal
> communications of every organism fuse with the hormonal communications in
> every other organism, creating the macro flow of perception and
> understanding. The very horizon of perception and understanding becomes the
> macro Biospheric perception and understanding. One joins the macro
> experience of the flow of revelations and perceptions and understandings
> from nature, which gets the identity as God.
>
> Education must start with the training in feeling as part of nature and
> not with the drilling of disconnected bits of informations. It must be
> training in feeling one’s basic macro identity.
>
> The tiny tot then will select a bird, bee, or some animal as the LKG
> beginning of education. It learns to fuse its internal hormonal
> communications and feelings and emotions with the hormonal communication of
> its subject matter friends. The subjects of education become emotional
> buddies. The child learns to converse with its subject mate without spoken
> words. In fact new words of the child’s own develop, representing the
> emotional interactions.
>
> We have to realize that science and technology are the biggest tragedies
> and catastrophies that happened and are happening to nature. Can you show
> one machine that does not wound nature? We have to realize that emotions do
> not stay in one being but they spread into every other organism via
> breathing, smelling and sensing.
>
> We do not even understand the implications of the so called scientific
> approach, where one must enter the make believe world as the outside
> observer of nature, assuming that he/she is not a part of and participant
> in nature. One must simply repudiate one’s own living in life. One’s very
> natural expansion of one’s horizon of perception and understanding in and
> as nature must be repudiated. From anthropocentricism, we have shifted to
> egoism and now fast drifting into the abyss of the ultimate cartesianism of
> total surrender to machines, where emotions and feelings have no place. In
> fact you have no place as everything will be performed by machines. In the
> artificial world of economics, the human has become redundant to human
> society.
>
> Economics has made the emotional biosphere redundant. In nature demand
> means the needs of nature. Supply means the automatic catering by nature in
> response to the demand. Demand and supply are the basic properties of
> nature. But thanks to economics, that process is made anthropocentric and
> from there part of the Newtonian mechanics.
>
> Free, lush and healthy nature is urgently and desperately needed. But in
> the words of PG Wodehouse we have developed the deportment of the buffalo
> chewing cud, totally indifferent to the extinction now happening.
>
> I get the message deluge into my cell phone, not miss the latest one
> million G, having crossed the Gs from one G, to 2G to 3G,on and on. The
> murderous assault of machines on nature, the economic assault is now
> happening.
>
> YM
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopO_hf-X-Enm5SmGcxQzwYQSrsECLNwLSpt640SKFgfkQ%40mail.gmail.com.
