Respected Mr Rama,
I may start from the last paragraph of your response.
"Perhaps through this mail I can appeal and request everyone in this forum NOT
to use abusive language, provocative or retaliative in the mail exchanges and
maintain the dignity and decorum of this group/ forum."
I have not used any abusing words so far and will not use. Let Mr Rajaram
respond agreeing to the proposal.
Respected sir, any appealing of this type so far went only to deaf years of Mr
Rajaram. If he stops, it will be the beginning of a new Era in the groups.
Now coming to your second paragraph- Let me make it explicitly clear that I was
not raising the matter with Sh GK frivolously. By the way between myself and
Sh GK we have exchanged on an amicable note and your uninvited meddling will
only lead to escalation.
Not very correct sir. I sent an edited copy of the mail sent to you with
preface. I was not very happy with your response by paragraphs, where I have
touched very important points. Perhaps they would not have been felt important
to you. Different persons have their own views.
Two points alone I will respond again, I desired you to address Mr Rajaram,
the chief abuser.Now you have addressed again ALL. I am 150% sure it will not
bother Mr Rajaram.
Second point was Mr Rajaram Calling me Bogus ITS. Your response was not one I
expected from an esteemed member like you...
So I responded today- "Thank you sir for response expressing your views on my
mail. Yes sir, we can have personal exchange of mails or through groups, on any
topic ".
I like to respect elders, friendship with equals. I never express
disagreement, dis contention, biased or any of the sort with others just by a
response. Repeated instances I respond.
You can find the reactions and not responses of Mr Rajaram in today's QA
postings 19 and 19A
Any way as I wrote about my honoring revered Mr Narayanaswamy in detail to
you. So I do not find anything wrong in Mr Narayanaswamy's response to you.
I fully appreciate his response.
Hope you understand me and my honouring revered Mr Narayanaswamy.
Gopalakrishnan
On Tuesday, 19 March, 2024 at 09:53:04 pm IST, Rama <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 23:51, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Sh Narayanaswamy Ji,
At the very outset let me state that your mail accusing me of "lashing out"
and badgering Sh GK with my advice was entirely unsolicited. Let me make it
explicitly clear that I was not raising the matter with Sh GK frivolously. By
the way between myself and Sh GK we have exchanged on an amicable note and your
uninvited meddling will only lead to escalation. I have observed your mail
responses are also full of abuses with vengeance and in fact more resentful and
envious. It seems an unworkable paradox to appeal and show restraint to
someone retaliating with his might while facing brickbats and caustic criticism
from all corners. Can't we not put an end to this vituperative outburst ? My
views are frank and forthright and not intended to offend or hurt anybody's
feelings. Perhaps through this mail I can appeal and request everyone in this
forum NOT to use abusive language, provocative or retaliative in the mail
exchanges and maintain the dignity and decorum of this group/ forum. With
regards, CheersRama
Dear Sri Rama
Please climb down from your high chair and take a perspective view before
lashing out at Sri Gopalakrishnan with your unsought inane advice.
You fulminate authoritatively:- " I feel this is unwarranted blatant
provocation to target and invite further abuses and vulgar “gaaliyan”."
Have you impartially and cool-headedly considered who initiated the
"provocation"?
Was it not Rajaram K alias KR ex-IRS alias Karuppan-chaami alias
Cockroachmoorthy who flung the brick from his own glass-house by exhorting:-
"You are a non-clay black head mattered; you can write only such replies
unaware of what you know little as the theory to profess, while people who
compiled the lexicon with or without computer compared the word in styles which
you did not fully; you and another sarama are good at barking blindly in the
street corner." ?
Why is not Sri Gopalakrishna entitled to throw back the brick and shatter the
provoker's glass-house?
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
--
Ramaswamy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAKaWjRn0oGJQ_rJon%2BS5seJVumM%3DAAtDySPHGU0%2BhVrxHcM3vA%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/2034021187.4044064.1710871647548%40mail.yahoo.com.
