Study: Dark matter does not exist and the universe is 27 billion years old
ByEric Ralls Earth.com staff writer INDIAN DISCOVERY
The fabric of the cosmos, as we currently understand it, comprises three
primary components: ‘normal matter,’ ‘dark energy,’ and ‘dark matter.’
However, new research is turning this established model on its head.
A recent study conducted by the University of Ottawa presents compelling
evidence that challenges the traditional model of the universe, suggesting
that there may not be a place for dark matter within it.
Core of the new CCC+TL model {KR: Specifically, he suggests "that the
universe as a whole should be viewed as an extended conformal manifold,
consisting of a (possibly infinite) succession of eons, each of which gives
rise to a complete history of the expanding universe" (p. 147). This is
what he calls "conformal cyclic cosmology" (CCC).AND “TL” MEANS “TIRED
LIGHT}
Dark matter, a term used in cosmology, refers to the elusive substance that
does not interact with light or electromagnetic fields and is only
identifiable through its gravitational effects. {KR Einstein theory of
relativity}
Despite its mysterious nature, dark matter has been a fundamental element
in explaining the behaviour of galaxies, stars, and planets.
At the heart of this research is Rajendra Gupta, a distinguished physics
professor at the Faculty of Science. Gupta’s innovative approach involves
the integration of two theoretical models: the covarying coupling constants
(CCC) and “tired light” (TL), known together as the CCC+TL model. (KR: Here
Rajendra Gupta explained as meaning}
This model explores the notion that the forces of nature diminish over
cosmic time and that light loses energy over vast distances.
This theory has been rigorously tested and aligns with various astronomical
observations, including the distribution of galaxies and the evolution of
light from the early universe.
Consequences of a dark matter-free cosmos This discovery challenges
the conventional understanding that dark matter constitutes approximately
27% of the universe, with ordinary matter making up less than 5% and the
rest being dark energy, while also redefining our perspective on the age
and expansion of the universe. {27+5+68)
“The study’s findings confirm our previous work, which suggested that the
universe is 26.7 billion years old, negating the necessity for dark
matter’s existence,” Gupta explains.
“Contrary to standard cosmological theories where the accelerated expansion
of the universe is attributed to dark energy, our findings indicate that
this expansion is due to the weakening forces of nature, not dark energy,”
he continued.{KR West is oriented towards a LINEAR THEORY ,meaning the
waves keep moving from .SAY, east or west or south to north or in one
direction only; HENCE ONLY THE SCIENCE AFTER LOOKING THROUGH THE TELESCOPE
Hubb, SAID IN THE BEGINNINGH FOR ABOUT 400 TO 600 MILLION YEARS OF
EVOLUTION ONLY HAD HYDROGEN, HELIUM LITHIUM ONLY AND AFTER STARS BURST ONLY
O2 AND CO2 AROSE, as the science saw in the hub those less o2 in the Hubb.
They said in their theory that it was 13.1-billion-year sample. But
Rajendra Gupta gives a material by which it is now 27 billion years old
earth; if so, what was seen as 13.1 B for o2 is far behind since even in
linear movement, the said early big bang sample should gave moved in front
of 27 billion years. Then oxygen theory falls. What was seen in Hubb could
be 6 models of anything in the space. We say 155trillion years , to reach
this fig by west will take , may be out 100 rebirths eras. AND WE NEVER
SAAY LINEAR; IT IS CIRCULAR; SSINCE AXIS REVOLUTION ALONE IS SEEN BY ANY
LARGE BODIES IN SPACE, THERE MUST BE ONE CHASING THE OTHER IN A CYCLIC
ORDER. So old particles may be seen in a spot in between a cyclic period at
a point. AND WHAT IS THE PERIOD OF THAT ONE CYCLE TIME?}
Science behind Gupta’s discovery
An integral part of Gupta’s research involved analyzing “redshifts,” a
phenomenon where light shifts towards the red part of the spectrum.
By examining data on galaxy distribution at low redshifts and the angular
size of the sound horizon at high redshifts, Gupta presents a compelling
argument against the existence of dark matter, while remaining consistent
with key cosmological observations. Gupta confidently concludes, “There are
several papers that question the existence of dark matter, but mine is the
first one, to my knowledge, that eliminates its cosmological existence
while being consistent with key cosmological observations that we have had
time to confirm.”
Implications and future directions
In summary, Rajendra Gupta’s innovative research fundamentally challenges
the prevailing cosmological model by proposing a universe without the need
for dark matter.
By integrating the covarying coupling constants and tired light theories,
Gupta not only contests the conventional understanding of cosmic
composition but also offers a new perspective on the universe’s expansion
and age. This pivotal study invites the scientific community to reconsider
long-held beliefs about dark matter and posits exciting new avenues for
understanding the fundamental forces and properties of the cosmos. Through
diligent analysis and a bold approach, Gupta’s work marks a significant
step forward in our quest to decode the mysteries of the universe.
More about dark matter
As discussed above, dark matter remains one of the most enigmatic aspects
of our universe. Despite its invisibility and the fact that it does not
emit, absorb, or reflect light, dark matter plays a crucial role in the
cosmos. Many scientists, though certainly not Rajendra Gupta, infer its
presence from the gravitational effects it exerts on visible matter,
radiation, and the large-scale structure of the universe.
Foundation of dark matter theory
The theory of dark matter emerged from discrepancies between the observed
mass of large astronomical objects and their calculated mass based on their
gravitational effects. In the 1930s, astronomer Fritz Zwicky was among the
first to suggest that invisible matter could account for the “missing” mass
in the Coma Cluster of galaxies.
KR So Indian Vedic Nasadiya theory may be true also; who knows that
who knows? May be even HE DOES NOT KNOW/; Nasadiya verses only end like
that . KR IRS 24324
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopAwd_WiDceW0OT%3D%3DNJ0MS5mV64tPC1T-xon361t9kY1w%40mail.gmail.com.
