Force of a moving mass sridharan says ; then space structures moving mass
at that speed; there is a designer to control  Aazhither is that ; moving
like force waves, swaying yet well balanced; and when the balance is
shifted narrowly, force hammers. Baltimore bridge car travellers who went
down are not spoken about. KR IRS 28324

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Srinivasan Sridharan <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 15:09
Subject: Re: Baltimore bridge wreck
To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>


As a practicing structural designer for more than  half a century , I can
vouch say that the force from a moving mass of several thousand tons can
even crush a cliff as large as a football field , not to mention a tiny
pier supporting one side of a bridge!
        Sridharan.



On Mar 28, 2024, at 11:14 AM, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
wrote:



Will Baltimore bridge collapse force U.S. to pay more attention to its
infrastructure?

The Francis Scott Key Bridge will get rebuilt with federal funds, but many
other structures across the nation aren’t getting the same support.

An aerial view show large broken pieces of a bridges structure poking out
of the water with a contianer ship of colorful cargo.

Though thousands of active bridges in the U.S. are "structurally deficient"
according to a report from the American Society of Civil Engineers, there's
no evidence that the Francis Scott Key Bridge that collapsed Tuesday was
one of them. Experts say that the cargo ship collision would've caused a
collapse on even an ideally maintained bridge.

March 26, 2024

The collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore is the latest
example of a challenge to U.S. infrastructure amid a lack of funds and
motivation to maintain aging bridges, experts say.

The Baltimore bridge "is an old and reliable piece of infrastructure, that
under almost any reasonable circumstances would be standing in another 20
or 30 years,” says Joseph L. Schofer, professor emeritus of civil and
environmental engineering at Northwestern University's McCormick School of
Engineering. “If you come along and pull out the primary support, there's
no way to save the bridge.”

Though he has no reason to believe negligence was involved in the Baltimore
collapse, Schofer says some infrastructure catastrophes are. He points to
the Fern Hollow Bridge failure in Pittsburgh as an example: The National
Transportation Safety Board concluded reports and recommendations to fix
corroded steel supports went ignored, ultimately leading to the collapse of
the 447-foot-long bridge, which dropped a bus and four cars to the park
below.

It’s a disturbing trend as train derailments, highway and bridge collapses,
and dam failures are being seen across the U.S, experts say. But which
areas are civil engineers most concerned could cause imminent catastrophe,
and what can we do about it?

Physical collapse is happening now

Federal funding will rebuild the Francis Scott Key Bridge, which more than
30,000 cars use daily.

“In terms of where you go from here, you've got a bridge that's failed, and
probably more likely, you want to rebuild it. So what are your options?"
Schofer says.

"Going forward, you’ve got some really interesting design options that
could either make the likelihood of this kind of event very small or
eliminated entirely, and I think probably that's what they'll do with a new
design.”

But many other key structures across the country aren’t getting the same
attention.

“There are cautionary tales all over,” says Maria Lehman, president of the
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and vice chair of the Biden
administration’s National Infrastructure Advisory Council. “Every county in
the country has a list of bridges that, if they had money, they would
replace tomorrow.”

The 617,000 bridges in the U.S. include not just those spanning mighty
rivers but also every highway overpass and minor link across a stream—and
close to one tenth of them are significantly compromised. “If you have to
think in terms of catastrophe, we’re already there,” says Amlan Mukherjee,
the director of sustainability focusing on infrastructure at WAP
Sustainability Consulting.

In 2007, the collapse of an I-35W bridge in Minnesota killed 13 people and
injured 145. More recently, a six-lane bridge over the Mississippi was
closed for three months in 2021, disrupting interstate travel and shipping
because an inspector missed a significant crack. Americans drive 178
million trips on structurally deficient bridges each day, according to the
2021 report from the ASCE.

Yet the U.S. spends only 1.5 to 2.5 percent of its GDP on infrastructure,
proportionately less than half of what the European Union spends, Lehman
says. This long-term lack of funding has run out the clock on many
solutions. Many U.S. bridges were built to last 30 to 50 years, but nearly
half are at least half a century old. The average age of U.S. levees is
also 50; dams average 57.

The future of U.S. infrastructure

Mukherjee is optimistic about the use of new technology to solve some of
the country's infrastructure issues, though adoption has been slow. Drones
can provide human inspectors with up-close views of areas they can’t reach
themselves and reduce chance of human error; a drone on an unrelated
project captured footage of the Mississippi bridge crack two years before
its discovery.

Bilal Ayyub, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the
University of Maryland, College Park, has also worked with North American
freight railroads to find weak links using computer modelling. This can
comb through thousands of stations to “identify exactly which point if it
fails will have the biggest impact,” he says.

K RAJARAM IRS 28324

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoroPcnrdmdbhjLmOe5uAho-Uxz7nh2uP_SgWSHcsXmn2A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to