Now we cannot afford to waste another 5 years without implementing anything; either money or vote or as Annamalai did NO-MONEY for vote ,inculcating the minds of south people at Large and north wherever necessary, must be pruned and clipped within 2 years. Assembly elections must be won.And even if arajakam, all regional party heads with raids must be sent to Jail for long years in just 2 years. Caste and creed eradication, by retaining them only indoors, must be enforced by pressure and rewards. Else India will become another Uganda. It is not regional politics; it is politics of money run by the regions. (regents?) KR IRS 5624
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 00:17, 'N Sekar' via KeralaIyers < [email protected]> wrote: > What is in brackets is my surmise based on his article and other write ups. > > Jagannathan, called Jaggi, Editorial Director of Swarajaya also wrote in > Swarajya that one of the major reasons why BJP performed badly in U P as a > whole was because > > 1. "39 Candidates proposed by Yogi were rejected by the Central > Leadership" (read Modi, Amit Shah and Nadda) > > 2. "He has hinted at (I feel it is Amit Shah, perhaps without naming him) > that people were uncomfortable about the growing stature of Yogi, who is > seen as the next P M by many. This has resulted in greed and the need to > put Yogi down". (I feel - By nominating their people they will get their > loyalty when the need arises) > > ( I can say it is an open secret that many senior leaders were against > Annamalai in T N as they could not stomach such a young person doing so > well and garnering all the glory and there are reports they had a secret > understanding with the AIADMK, who also see Annamalai as their enemy. > > ( We Hindus will never unite as as has been shown in history, such > selfish, greedy people we are. While we preach tolerance (the tolerant > brigade) to others, we are so intolerant when one of our own succeeds. We > will pull each other down even if it means our enemies will succeed, we > can't see beyond our nose) > > N Sekar > > > On Wednesday, June 5, 2024 at 08:33:41 AM GMT+4, Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Why BJP Lost In Ayodhya Despite Ram Janmabhoomi Temple > > SWATI GOEL SHARMAJun 04, 2024, 08:10 PM swarajya > > Is it correct? KR IRS > > The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)’s defeat in the Faizabad seat in Uttar > Pradesh has stumped many, given the recent ‘pran prathishtha’ and opening > of the grand Ram Janmabhoomi temple in its Ayodhya city. > > BJP candidate Lallu Singh's loss to Samajwadi Party’s Awadhesh Prasad, > despite Singh’s back-to-back victories from the same Lok Sabha constituency > in the last two general elections, signifies a significant shift in local > political dynamics. Prasad defeated Singh by over 54,000 votes, having > garnered a total of 554,289 votes. > > As per local experts, several factors have contributed to the unexpected > electoral outcome. > > One major misstep by Lallu Singh was his controversial remark that the BJP > needed two-third majority to be able to “make changes in the Constitution”. > He reportedly made the remark on 13 April at a chaupal in Ayodhya’s > Milkipur, from where he has been five-time MLA. > > The opposition quickly latched on to the controversy, alleging that the > BJP aimed to alter reservations for members of the scheduled and backward > castes. > > SP national president Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP of having a “hidden > agenda to end reservations provided to backward classes, Dalits, and > minorities”. > > This rhetoric seems to have resonated strongly with those who feared the > erosion of reservation benefits. > > The SP strategically fielded Awadhesh Prasad, a member of the Pasi > community, which bolstered the party’s appeal among Dalits. Prasad’s > campaign slogan was — “In Ayodhya, no Mathura, no Kashi; only Awadhesh > Pasi.” > > Local resentment against some administrative decisions regarding the Ram > temple also seems to have played a crucial role. > > Road-widening work in the city led to the demolition or displacement of > over 4,000 shops along several routes leading to the temple. As per a BJP > worker from Ayodhya, residents complain that compensation and > rehabilitation promises fell short, leaving many shop owners feeling > betrayed. > > One of such residents is a photographer this publication spoke to. He said > that he ran a shop near the makeshift temple that existed on the disputed > site before bhoomi pujan of the new temple in 2020. His shop was demolished > for road widening, but he was paid a mere Rs 1 lakh for it. He waited for > several months to be allotted a new shop as promised. But when the time > came, he was told to pay up Rs 20 lakh to run it. > > “They allotted me a shop in a shopping complex they have built. But asked > for Rs 20 lakh to use it. I did not have that kind of money,” he said. “I > simply lost my livelihood.” > > He accuses the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra of “grabbing land” and > blames, by extension, the BJP. He says his sentiment is shared by all those > who lost their businesses and “collectively decided to vote against the > BJP”. > > Furthermore, the hurried inauguration of the temple, believed to be timed > to coincide with the election campaign, led to significant mismanagement, > an Ayodhya-based journalist told this publication. > > As per him, residents have been facing numerous inconveniences, such as > discontinued private vehicular movement on several routes and the need to > walk considerable distances to board state-run buses due to barricaded > routes. > > He further said that while the influx of pilgrims was expected to boost > local economy, the anticipated economic benefits failed to materialise for > small business owners. > > “It is only the big players and outsiders opening businesses in Ayodhya > who are benefitting or stand to benefit,” he said. > > Another journalist, who did not wish to be named, that the BJP cadre in > Ayodhya felt let down when prime minister Narendra Modi, during his > campaigning in the area, “repeatedly lauded Iqbal Ansari while ignoring all > those who made sacrifices for the temple”. Ansari was key litigant in the > Babri mosque-Ram Janmabhoomi legal dispute from the Muslim side, having > inherited the suit from his father, Mohammed Haji Hashim Ansari. > > Iqbal Ansari publicly accepted the Supreme Court verdict allocating the > dispute land to the Hindu petitioners in 2019. > > “While Ayodhyawasis respect the Ansari family, people who made real > sacrifices for the temple were ignored in the speeches,” the journalist > said. The gesture, coupled with the Padma Vibhushan to Samajwadi Party > founder Mulayam Singh Yadav, notorious for ordering security forces to open > fire at karsewaks in 1990, triggered anger among the BJP cadre, he said. > > In conclusion, the BJP's loss in Ayodhya can be attributed to a > combination of insensitive development practices, controversial political > rhetoric, and failure to address local grievances. > > Although the temple's construction fulfilled a long-standing desire and > brought a sense of pride, for many locals, it has become a symbol of their > displacement and marginalisation. > > This election result serves as a stark reminder that while symbolic > gestures may resonate nationally, local issues and sentiments ultimately > drive electoral outcomes. > > KR IRS 5624 > > -- > On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust > > We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join > > Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup > > Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust > > Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: > https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "KeralaIyers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZopbt_XhrRvUP4f1%3DrCkEmBYuvfLCpZ4gQBWRvNy%3DfFZ2A%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZopbt_XhrRvUP4f1%3DrCkEmBYuvfLCpZ4gQBWRvNy%3DfFZ2A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > Virus-free.www.avg.com > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > <#m_1022217222051231391_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > -- > On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust > > We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join > > Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup > > Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust > > Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: > https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "KeralaIyers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/545786995.1640181.1717564652494%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/545786995.1640181.1717564652494%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZorKdXdMLKGTZ8-Y65KnKCm50-tMiF59H3ZJ3aOGu7%2B-8w%40mail.gmail.com.
