Very interesting, thanks for sharing. However Reminds me of Birth sHari's Vakya Padia book. Nirukta in Sanskrit says so. I different from your explanation. Every language word denote only the characters of the object and Sanskrit is unique in the sense IT ALSO CONTAINS THE CHARACTERS APART FROM DENOTING THE OBCT WHICH IS ABSENT FROM WORLD LANGI K RAJARAM IRS 11624
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 05:40, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]> wrote: > In the article Elephants may call each other by name, a rare trait in > nature > <https://www.nationalgeographic.com/premium/article/african-elephants-names-communication> > by Joyce Pool I happened to see the observation: "In human language, an > arbitrary label would be calling a bovine a “cow,” since that word does not > resemble, either physically or acoustically, the animal itself." I felt > this is not true because we have the common example of a crow being called > cawcaw from the sound that it makes. This led me to find out how words are > formed in Sanskrit. > https://uttishthabharata.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/sanskrit-syntax/ > https://uttishthabharata.wordpress.com/2011/04/20/sanskrit/ > > > Elephants may call each other by name, a rare trait in nature > > African savanna elephants communicate more like humans than previously > thought, new research shows—opening up ne... > > <https://www.nationalgeographic.com/premium/article/african-elephants-names-communication> > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooWVgRjHYwi8xhHKdVTv2gWqng0jDG4OjUBMqbATKv16g%40mail.gmail.com.
