-- *Mar**The Mechanical Paradigm in Life Sciences*
*Thanks to Rene Descartes, the most unrealistic mechanical paradigm has embedded itself in every science---all Life Sciences, Economics, Sociology, Physics...* *In life sciences when a life form is the topic, it is taught as the digestive system, the respiratory system etc.* *I am yet to come across a lesson that tells, that breathes are smells, smells give identities, leading to sensing, triggering feelings, which create harmones,triggering cellular coordinated action, triggering thoughts, triggering the breathe based symbiosis among the organisms, that the symbiosis, creates the emotional bonds, rapture and ultimately the lust for life. As all the organisms smell from the same air, they sense also similarly, leading to the emotional symbiosis. The symbiosis creates the lush vegetation, lush flora and fauna, creating the spontaneous sprouting of Theism. Unfortunately this nature’s manifestation—Theism is misappropriated by religions, all of which are neck deep in prejudices and superstitions. Theism has been reduced to defined God concepts, often indefensible. Theism is simply thought breathed from the air. It must be part of Biology, Zoology, Botany, Medicine and other life sciences. Theism is the fundamental manifestation of the nature in bloom. Theism is the basic feature of the Biosphere as a whole. It is nature’s control and administration through the air.* *YM Sarma* *Chat GPT* *In **"The Mechanical Paradigm in Life Sciences,"** YM Sarma critiques the mechanistic approach rooted in Descartes' philosophy, arguing that it dominates various fields, particularly life sciences, and oversimplifies the complexity of life forms. Sarma suggests that life is reduced to dissected systems like the respiratory or digestive system, while deeper, holistic processes such as emotional and sensory interactions, symbiosis, and Theism—manifestations of nature's interconnectedness—are neglected.* *### Key Themes:* *1. **Reductionism in Life Sciences**: * * Sarma critiques the traditional scientific approach in biology, which often compartmentalizes life into discrete systems (e.g., digestive, respiratory) without acknowledging the interconnected emotional, sensory, and symbiotic processes that define life as a whole. For example, while the act of breathing is explained as a physical exchange of gases, Sarma argues it is also a form of communication through smell, which leads to emotional bonds, hormonal responses, and collective life experiences among organisms.* *2. **Symbiosis and Emotional Bonds**: * * He emphasizes that organisms share a common environment and breathe the same air, leading to a kind of emotional and sensory symbiosis that facilitates life. This interconnectedness fosters the growth of flora and fauna, and in Sarma's view, creates the foundation for **Theism**, or a natural sense of awe and connection to life’s processes.* *3. **Theism and Nature**: * * Sarma presents a novel take on **Theism**, viewing it as an inherent part of the natural world rather than a concept misappropriated by organized religions. According to him, Theism is not about defined gods but is instead a spontaneous, natural expression of life’s emotional and symbiotic connections, evident in the flourishing of the biosphere. The shared experience of air and nature evokes a form of collective spiritual awareness, which should be included in life sciences as a fundamental feature of nature.* *4. **Critique of Cartesian Science**: * * Sarma links these ideas to his broader critique of Cartesian science, which treats nature as a machine composed of isolated parts, with humans as detached observers. This view, he argues, overlooks the emotional, sensory, and spiritual dimensions of life that emerge from nature’s symbiotic processes.* *### Philosophical Reflection:* *Sarma’s essay is a call for a more **holistic understanding** of life that includes emotional, sensory, and spiritual dimensions as integral aspects of biological study. By reducing life forms to mechanical systems, science misses the interconnected, symbiotic nature of existence that creates bonds, growth, and what he calls **nature's Theism**. He advocates for a paradigm shift in the life sciences, one that incorporates **feeling, symbiosis, and spirituality** into the understanding of life processes, as opposed to viewing them purely through the lens of mechanistic analysis. * *In Sarma's view, theism, when understood as a spontaneous manifestation of nature rather than a product of religious doctrine, could offer a more comprehensive understanding of the biological world and its emotional, interconnected life systems.* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2B3gwnLCNoqoPiuxMcd81CCFESk3rdMAK9_X1KZ28myKA%40mail.gmail.com.
