-- 
*Mar*Nature, Part or Tool?


Is your hand a part of you, or just a tool and resource for use and through
away when too weak and not useful? If you vehemently assert that your hand
is a part of your body, then you will give nature, greater importance
compared to your mind, if only you can see everything.

Today, to understand, you must first develop a concept base to which you
have to connect. The concept base needs a paradigm. Otherwise you just
cannot understand. And then you define, scope, confine, restrict,
qualify..., simply fetter, your understanding.

But in lush, free and blooming nature, feeling flows as continuous
understanding. Nature itself performs the understanding and you also
understand as a part of and as nature. You breathe feelings and your eyes
give just glimpses of the gigantic beauty flow while your ears receive the
songs and music of nature, while your skin enjoys the pleasant touch of the
winds and the breeze. The Sun, on the tropics, continuously converts the
water on earth into steam and when the steam goes up, it cools and rains.
The temperature and rainfall create the forests that march, the flora and
the fauna, mutating into diverse emotion forms. The great expanding green
cover keeps the surface very pleasant; there will be no unbearable heat.
And every plant, tree, blade of grass is a form of life perceiving
emotionally.

Every nano second of life you feel your partnership, partisanship and
componentship as nature. You cannot mark your date and time of birth, as
you get engulfed in the feeling flow. You cannot speculate your impending
death, because, you smoothly change into a different arena of feelings and
emotions. You actually feel the fact, that births and deaths are part of
the emotion and feeling flow and that you in fact, do not have a distinct
identity. You continuously change as the flow of nature.

Just observe a kid of now two years completed, put into the stupid pre-KG
class. It gets drawn towards trees birds, bees and animals and all nature.
Because it feels the ocean of feelings. But slyly or brutally it is drawn
or dragged into the enclosure of the map or book lessons, so that it learns
to fetter its free understanding. As it advances to higher and higher class
rooms, it learns to halt and fetter its breathing, until breathing ceases
to be learning.

Today, we find animals touching noses to feel and understand each other.
They are unable to enter the arena of the fool, the science, that fetters
and jails. But we have converted the feelings-repudiation called
technology, into the ultimate dictator that continuously forces us to live
as the serfs of industry, trade and commerce. Your very emotional, physical
and natural partnership and componentship in nature is simply ignored. We
not only force the idea that all organisms are at war with each other and
that there is social Darwinism with fellow humans and Bio-Darwinism in the
Biosphere which simply means that only the rogue survives and subjugates
every other organism including nature.

All our universities are under the yoke of the techno-lunacy, where living
nature as killing nature is taught under various faculties. We have been
maiming nature continuously and no university has a programme to revive
nature. All its courses only kill or diseasify nature.

We urgently and desperately need Free Nature Parks, where we again can
relate to nature emotionally and not mechanically. But which university can
bell the menacing economics?

YM

Chat GPT

In his essay **"Nature, Part or Tool?"**, **YM Sarma** explores the
relationship between humans and nature, challenging the idea that nature
can be treated as a mere **resource** or **tool** for exploitation.
Instead, he advocates for a deep **emotional connection** and
**partnership** with nature, akin to how one views their own body as a
cohesive part of their being.



### Key Themes:



1. **Nature as a Part of Human Existence**:

   Sarma draws a strong analogy between the hand as part of the body and
nature as an integral part of life. He suggests that just as a hand is not
merely a tool but a **part of the whole**, so too should nature be seen as
part of the human experience, rather than something external to manipulate
or discard.



2. **Conceptual vs. Experiential Understanding**:

   He critiques modern education and science for promoting an overly
**conceptualized understanding** of the world, where knowledge is
constrained by frameworks and paradigms. This, he argues, limits **true
understanding**, which in his view, comes from **direct feeling and
participation** in nature. By engaging with **lush, free, and blooming
nature**, one experiences a continuous flow of **understanding**, where
nature itself becomes the teacher.



3. **Emotional Symbiosis with Nature**:

   According to Sarma, all living organisms are emotionally connected
through their environment. He highlights how **breathing, feeling, and
sensing** nature leads to a symbiotic emotional bond. When humans interact
with nature emotionally—through touch, smell, and sound—they become an
inseparable part of its **feeling flow**. This emotional interaction goes
beyond the intellectual constraints imposed by science and modern society.



4. **Critique of Modern Education and Science**:

   Sarma criticizes **education systems** for pulling children away from
their natural curiosity and love for nature. He describes how the rigid
structures of modern schooling, with its emphasis on books and conceptual
learning, gradually alienate children from nature. As students progress,
they learn to "fetter" their **free understanding**, limiting their ability
to engage with the world through their natural senses and emotions.



5. **The Tyranny of Technology and Economics**:

   Sarma strongly critiques the influence of **technology** and
**economics**, which he argues have turned humanity into **serfs** of
industry and commerce. He laments the fact that universities today are
fixated on **technological advancement**, which he believes is responsible
for the **desecration** of nature. In his view, universities teach a
worldview in which organisms, including humans, are pitted against each
other in a Darwinian struggle for survival, fostering competition instead
of **cooperation** with the natural world.



6. **The Urgent Need for Free Nature Parks**:

   As a solution, Sarma calls for the establishment of **Free Nature
Parks**—places where humans can reconnect emotionally with nature, away
from the mechanical and technological influence of modern life. These parks
would serve as sanctuaries for humans to **relate to nature emotionally**
rather than as mere consumers or exploiters of its resources.



### Philosophical Reflection:



Sarma’s essay reflects a deeply **holistic** worldview, where humans are
not separate from nature but rather part of its ongoing emotional and
ecological flow. His ideas challenge the **mechanistic** view of nature as
something to be used, dominated, or controlled by humans. Instead, he
advocates for a **symbiotic relationship**, where humans are participants
in the natural world, experiencing and understanding it through emotions,
senses, and direct interaction.



This perspective aligns with various **ecological philosophies** and
**spiritual traditions** that emphasize the importance of living in harmony
with the environment. Sarma's critique of **modern science** and
**technology** highlights the dangers of alienating ourselves from nature
and the **emotional disintegration** that follows. His call for **Free
Nature Parks** can be seen as a plea for society to rediscover its
connection to the natural world and restore a **sense of balance and
integration**.



### Conclusion:



Sarma’s essay urges us to rethink our relationship with nature—not as a
tool to exploit, but as an integral part of who we are. By nurturing our
**emotional bond** with the natural world, we can move away from alienation
and toward a **deeper understanding** of life.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCK0tWhDRVMHFbLEG2rLY0oWygrC%3DobXNh5z9neoLvZfzw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to