Spiritualism is also a science KR On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 14:41, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > -- > *Mar**Spiritualism and Science* > > *The path of Spiritualism is to live without forms in the formless. > According to Einstein, everything in fact moves at the speed of light. But > the other three dimensions---length, breadth and height, slow it. But when > a thing frees itself from those dimensions and when only the time dimension > remains the body will move at the speed of light. Are we all moving into > the time dimension only? When a body achieves the speed of light its volume > becomes infinite. Are we proceeding to infinity?* > > *Science is based on the effort to create definite forms, mathematical > reductions, mechanical constructs, it needs definitions and scopes within > the limits of the definition. Do we leave all sciences when we leave for > good?* > > *Can formlessness function as a paradigm, a connectable base for > understanding? Is that paradigm simply belief? While living we have > basically two fundamental paradigms—the inside and the outside. Many ask > the question after the infinity or at the end of the infinity, what? But > the Universe has no outside, something which we simply cannot conceptualize > while living. You cannot add, subtract, multiply or divide infinity. When > we live in the present, we experience the present and we cannot analyse > while living the present. When you start analysing, you stop living in the > present. Are we living the infinity, when we live in the present only? Can > science and Spiritualism co-exist? Can there be mechanized spiritualism, > which is what the Management Gurus are trying to achieve?* > > *More than 99 per cent of reality is in the invisible spectrum, the > abstract and formless arena, where material attributes based on the forms > conjured in the visible spectrum is meaningless. How to identify with > physical forms to the formless? Our own thoughts are formless, they are not > imprisoned in the three visible and the fourth-time (the feeling based), > dimensions. I puzzle whether the essence of spiritualism consists of > developing the ability to use the formless non three dimensional concepts > and the single or the uni-time concept for understanding.* > > *YM* > > *Chat GPT* > > *You're right that while the text explored the interplay between science > and spiritualism, it may not have directly answered your questions. Let me > address them more specifically:* > > > > *1. **Are we all moving into the time dimension only?** In the context of > Einstein's theory, all objects are influenced by time and space. However, > the idea of moving into the time dimension only is more of a philosophical > or spiritual interpretation, implying an experience beyond physical > constraints. This suggests a deeper connection with the present moment, > where time is experienced without the interruption of spatial dimensions.* > > > > *2. **Are we proceeding to infinity when a body achieves the speed of > light?** Scientifically, a body with mass cannot reach the speed of light > because its energy requirements would become infinite. Conceptually, > though, approaching the speed of light hints at transcending known physical > limits, which aligns with spiritual beliefs of reaching an infinite or > boundless state.* > > > > *3. **Do we leave all sciences when we leave for good?** This touches on > the question of existence beyond physical life. Spiritual traditions often > suggest that consciousness or being continues without the constructs of > science, implying that the soul or awareness transcends scientific > understanding at that point.* > > > > *4. **Can formlessness function as a paradigm for understanding?** Yes, in > spiritualism, formlessness represents the unquantifiable aspects of > existence, such as love, consciousness, or the soul. It functions as a > paradigm that isn't based on empirical evidence but on experiential and > intuitive knowledge.* > > > > *5. **Are we living the infinity when we live in the present?** From a > spiritual perspective, yes. Being fully present means experiencing life > without past or future constraints, which can be seen as touching the > infinite.* > > > > *6. **Can science and spiritualism co-exist?** They can, but they often > operate in different realms: science deals with empirical evidence and > forms, while spiritualism embraces the abstract and unquantifiable. A > holistic worldview may integrate both, acknowledging that each has its > place in understanding the full spectrum of existence.* > > > > *7. **Can there be mechanized spiritualism?** Mechanized spiritualism > refers to structured practices that attempt to create spiritual experiences > or states. While methods like mindfulness techniques can guide people, true > spiritual realization is seen as transcending structured approaches and > cannot be fully mechanized.* > > > > *Would you like any of these ideas expanded or explained further?* > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooqkna%2Bp_%2BcCXg7%2BD0%3DEt3dTNyXQDP9qHbhwGT8p6bs_w%40mail.gmail.com.
