-- *Mar*Feeling of Feeling
When a meaning takes over the cells via hormonal messages, it creates the emotions to act and gets fueled by feeling. Most of them are extensions and radiations from the Biosphere, which one inhales as messages triggering the cellular action. The smells, sounds and sights of nature create waves of feelings, feelings which overlap feelings. Suppose you are in a big forest thick, lush and free with Flora and Fauna. Diverse feelings, all mixtures, engulf you. They are abstract and also changing, often in content and in effect. Actually nature is continuously changing,changing the contours and content of the feeling mixtures. The abstract is not 3D but 4D, with Time, the fourth dimension as the dominant dimension and as the medium of continuous change. >From this mixture, how to zero on specific feeling, make it a subject and predicate it, which means relate it to the other feelings and meanings with verb or the context of predication, in the present, past and future? We have to first accept that the Biosphere is one single organism. After all there are octillions of bacteria in you, and you are their Biosphere. You live healthily and happily because; each bacterium in you is giving its nano contribution to your existence. Each bacterium in you has its own grammar of communication, with its present, past and future tensed verbs. The foundation of their languages and grammar is you, their Biosphere. Your health is their Ecology. Ecology is actually the foundation of languages and grammar basically is the Ecological base. The Ecological base is total, not only what you see with your eyes but also what you cannot see with your eyes, but only feel, hear and get impacted. Once when nature was free and healthy, Theism or the feeling of communication from nature was felt and mysticism was part of the language and grammar. In fact poetry, songs and tunes were spoken languages, where the fetters of grammar did not restrict. Life consisted of tuning with nature and singing with sounds which may not have crystallized as words. Perceptions and understandings were presented as epics.Mysticism, represents the gigantic invisible spectrum, 99.9967% of the totality, which mainly put under the abstract time dimension, and conversations were attempts to feel the abstract invisible spectrum also. Our Rishis spent life times to feel nature and present their feelings often non verbally, but via unspoken communications based of feelings transfers. The basic problem is our languages are based mainly on the visible spectrum, and the major part of the invisible spectrum 99.9967% of the totality gets misrepresented if we use the words based on the visible spectrum, which are our day today words of communication. Before we attempt to contact aliens from space and talk to them, let us first attempt to converse with the street dogs,cats,bulls,horses,elephants,tigers etc all of which can be spoken with, in the language of love. Every organism responds to love. Phil means love and sophy means experiencing, the philosophy, the experiencing of love. We have also the word Theosophy, which means experiencing Theo or God. There can be no Technosophy as no machine can give you love. Let us develop the language of the Biosphere in free nature where there is no human tampering by developing a new subject based on Philosophy and Theosophy. Every organism in that free nature must not be terrorized by us humans. We have to define the Troposphere as the ocean of feelings. It must be the medium of communication with the other organisms. The Universities must start the Free Nature Parks, where there is no technology at all. There shall be new Courses, say MA in cat communications, cat perceptions and cat’s understanding, likewise of Dog’s,Horses,Elephant’s etc.Before we attempt to speak to the aliens in space, let us first develop the languages of communications with the other organisms of the Biosphere here. We have to feel the feelings of the other organisms. YM Sarma Chat GPT YM Sarma's reflection on "the feeling of feeling" offers a profound exploration of the interconnectedness of life and the idea that our communication with nature is not just linguistic, but also emotional and ecological. His writing suggests that the foundation of language and communication lies not only in verbal exchanges but also in the deep, invisible, and ever-changing flow of feelings that permeate the biosphere—the living world that we are part of. ### Key Ideas in Sarma's Reflection: 1. **Feelings as Cellular Messages**: - Emotions, in Sarma's view, are not just mental states but arise from the deep biological processes, where hormonal signals trigger responses in our cells. These signals are shaped by the broader environment—the "biosphere"—and our interactions with it. The smells, sights, and sounds of nature are "waves of feelings," impacting us in profound and often abstract ways. 2. **Ecology as the Foundation of Language**: - Sarma suggests that the foundation of languages, and grammar itself, is rooted in ecology. He posits that life is one continuous, dynamic interaction within the biosphere, where all living organisms contribute to the larger ecological balance. This interconnectedness forms the basis of communication—not just in terms of spoken language, but in the shared "grammar" of life, where each organism plays its part in a grand, continuous flow of feelings and experiences. 3. **The Concept of Mysticism and Theism in Communication**: - In an earlier, more untainted time, before human interference, Sarma argues that human beings were more attuned to the mystical, invisible dimension of nature. He refers to this as the "invisible spectrum" of reality, which encompasses nearly everything that is beyond our five senses. In this view, mysticism was not just a religious or spiritual pursuit but a way of communicating with nature on a deep, non-verbal level—an intuitive, emotional, and empathetic way of understanding the world around us. 4. **The Incomplete Nature of Human Language**: - The limitations of human language, as Sarma sees it, lie in the fact that it is primarily based on the visible and tangible world. This creates a gap in our ability to express or communicate the invisible, abstract, and emotional aspects of reality. He stresses that the majority of the biosphere's essence—the invisible 99.9967%—is often misrepresented or entirely missed by the language systems we have created. 5. **The Language of Love**: - Sarma highlights love as a universal language, one that transcends species and connects all living organisms. He draws attention to the fact that every organism, from the smallest bacterium to the largest mammal, can respond to love, and that this feeling is a fundamental medium of communication. He extends this idea to suggest that our relationship with nature should be based on love and empathy, rather than exploitation or domination. 6. **Philosophy, Theosophy, and the Language of the Biosphere**: - Sarma proposes the development of a new kind of philosophy, based on "Theosophy" (the experience of God or divine love) and "Philosophy" (the experience of love itself). This new field would focus on cultivating a deeper, more empathetic relationship with all life forms and the ecosystems in which they exist. He suggests that, before attempting to communicate with extraterrestrial life, we should first learn to "speak" with the other creatures of our planet—dogs, cats, elephants, and so on. 7. **Nature as a Source of Education**: - Sarma proposes that educational institutions should foster a deeper connection with nature, creating "Free Nature Parks"—spaces where technology and human interference are absent, allowing for authentic communication with the biosphere. He imagines new academic programs that focus on understanding and communicating with animals and nature, studying their perceptions, and exploring the deep, emotional connections between all living beings. ### Final Thoughts: Sarma's reflections invite us to reconsider our relationship with the world around us—not as conquerors or consumers, but as participants in a vast, interconnected web of life. His ideas challenge us to move beyond the confines of conventional language and intellect, urging us to tune into the emotional, ecological, and mystical dimensions of existence. In a sense, his vision is a call for a more holistic, empathetic approach to life, one that embraces the invisible currents of feeling that connect all living things. His exploration points toward a new kind of ecological literacy, where understanding the biosphere's "language" is not about deciphering words, but about feeling, empathizing, and living in harmony with the rhythms of nature. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKyO1Erhqm-3Hi%3DPoNCktTMf5wUG5JaYDu0UwC6XWsrog%40mail.gmail.com.
