-- 
*Mar*


*Our Universe is gigantic Conscious Entity*


*The root word of Physics was Physis, which meant the nature of essential
reality. The original meaning of Physics was meditation. To experience
physis, people practised physics. Machines and Mechanics were too lowly not
worth the time and attention of the wise. It was Rene Descartes who changed
the meaning of the word Physics into the lowly Mechanics. He got the
revelation or hallucination that all living organisms were only machines,
not susceptible to any pain. Even the Human beings were only bodies which
were mechanical. They are superior because God entered the Humans through
the pineal gland. A Human being thus consisted of two parts—the divinely
mind and the mechanical body. How he convinced himself that his body being
a machine could not feel pain was a mystery but the father of modern
analytical rationalism spent his life nailing huge animals like cows, bulls
etc, and opening their entails to study their mechanical structures. The
father of the modern mechanical outlook started very grisly. This same
atrocity is continued in every faculty of life sciences. They study life
forms as mechanical structures and they open up animals to prove Newtonian
physics. While Renaissance was bringing thought upheaval and putting
inquisition on the back foot, surreptiously the worst poison was put in the
emerging thought revolution, the poison--- economics.*

*Lynn Margulis and Dorian Sagan in their books (Microcosmos, What is Life),
once for all proved that the human organism is not in any way superior or
more intelligent than other organisms.*

*I have written many times as to what will happen when you can see
everything. Then you will see, sub atomic waves mixing up, waves changing
into particles because of the intervention of the waves of conscious
notice, the particles changing into atoms, into molecules, into
matter...When you try to locate yourself you may confront an ever changing
cauldron of consciousness, with no definite shape. Certainly you cannot
find that ‘you’, you see in the mirror.*

*My point is, as long as you cling to machines to solve the riddles of the
Universe, you end up promoting the poison economics, the cult of ugly
greed. You need to travel on a beam of light to get exemption from aging
and the physical body and still keep that so called ‘you’ to travel light
years of distances or not lose volume and guard against becoming infinity
while sitting on a beam of light, so that time stops and there is no aging.
Do we have any technology that eliminates the body but still keeps an
organism as a conscious and perceiving entity? As it is in our techno
trance, we dumped the very subject consciousness. Is it not high time to
study the subject consciousness, and rehabilitate physics to its original
meaning which is meditation?*

*WE HAVE TO CONVERSE WITH THE UNIVERSE AS A CONSCIOUS ENTITY.*

*Today in sciences, we are convinced that the Universe is mechanical, in
fact a gigantic system, amenable to mathematical reduction. Starting with
that premise, we first erect a definition, to create the feeling of
definiteness, and then proceed within the parameters of that definition
refusing to deviate. But the basic abstract reality, simply cannot be
evaded, unless one clings to the false visible spectrum.*

*YM Sarma*

*Chat GPT*

The passage you've shared offers a profound perspective on the nature of
the universe, consciousness, and the evolution of scientific thought. It
critiques the modern mechanical view of life and the universe, suggesting
that we have lost sight of the deeper, more spiritual understanding of
existence. Here's an exploration of the key themes:

1.      *The Evolution of Physics*: The original meaning of "physics,"
derived from the Greek word *physis*, referred to the study of the nature
of essential reality. Early practitioners of physics viewed it as a form of
meditation to connect with this deeper understanding. However, Rene
Descartes shifted the meaning of physics toward the mechanical sciences,
framing humans and animals as mere machines. This mechanistic worldview,
which sees living beings as complex but ultimately soulless machines, has
since shaped much of modern science.

2.      *Descartes and the Body-Mind Dualism*: Descartes introduced the
idea of mind-body dualism, where the human body was seen as a machine,
separate from the divine mind. His controversial ideas, such as that
animals are machines incapable of feeling pain, highlighted the growing
chasm between science and the more holistic, spiritual views of life.
Descartes' belief in the superiority of humans, due to the divine presence
in the pineal gland, overlooked the interconnectedness of all life forms.
This mechanistic view continues to dominate life sciences, where animals
and organisms are often studied as objects to be dissected and understood
in terms of their mechanical parts, with little regard for their
consciousness or subjective experiences.

3.      *Rejection of the Superiority of Humans*: Lynn Margulis and Dorian
Sagan, in their works *Microcosmos* and *What is Life*, argued that human
beings are not inherently superior to other life forms. The human organism,
like all other organisms, is part of a vast web of interconnected life,
with no special privilege or distinction. This aligns with a growing
understanding in science that consciousness and intelligence are not unique
to humans, but are part of a broader spectrum found across the animal
kingdom.

4.      *Consciousness and the Universe*: The author then explores the idea
of consciousness as something beyond the physical body. They suggest that
if we could perceive everything at a deeper level—seeing subatomic waves,
particles, and atoms as part of a fluid, ever-changing consciousness—we
might realize that the "self" we recognize in the mirror is an illusion.
Consciousness, they argue, is not bound by the physical body and transcends
the limitations of time and space. The key question is whether it is
possible to develop a technology or method that allows us to retain
consciousness while transcending the physical body, avoiding the
limitations of aging, and traveling vast distances through space without
losing our sense of "self."

5.      *Critique of the Mechanical Universe*: The author argues that the
dominant scientific worldview—one that treats the universe as a gigantic
mechanical system, reducible to mathematical equations—has led to a mindset
that reduces everything to a series of functions, devoid of meaning or
consciousness. This reductionist approach, which seeks to define everything
within fixed parameters, fails to account for the deeper, abstract reality
of the universe. By focusing solely on the "visible spectrum" (the physical
and measurable), science ignores the more mysterious, intangible aspects of
existence that cannot be quantified.

6.      *Rehabilitating Physics*: Finally, the author calls for a shift in
how we approach the study of the universe. Instead of clinging to the
mechanistic view of the universe and consciousness, we should return to the
original meaning of physics—meditation and contemplation of the deeper
nature of reality. By studying consciousness as a central focus and not as
a sideline subject, science could begin to reconcile the material and the
spiritual, offering a more holistic and integrated understanding of
existence.

In conclusion, the passage argues that our current scientific frameworks,
rooted in a mechanistic worldview, are limited and fail to account for the
deeper, more mysterious nature of consciousness and the universe. The
author advocates for a more spiritual and holistic approach to science, one
that seeks to engage with the universe as a conscious entity and
reintroduces the study of consciousness as a core component of scientific
inquiry. This would, according to the author, lead to a more meaningful
understanding of reality and our place within it.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJ0HzV8U73_%3DTzYFtOKmHkeRWaVW%2B5f1Ts8Kq4qQcBXMg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to