Today only I wrote from Brihadaranyaka upanishad on body Graha and navagraha. One difference I show is that Prakriti retorts back. You throw the dust in the waste water channels; your area gets flooded with sham water entering your home. Greedy people do not admit their guilt but brave more for money to be shared with the ruling Politicians. Top bureaucrats, Gharmic people, and good memory cherishers minority alone do suffer and are unable to remove them from Power. And Judiciary dances to their songs unashamedly. They blame the bureaucracy as a scapegoat. And political wings get emboldened because of purchased postings. However, whenever there are imbalances from the bad asuras greediness, dharma the Prakriti hits them hard in so many ways. We are all incapable of even speaking as many better placed in the society are silent without locking the gates which they did while in service. THINGS GETS BALANCED BUT IT TAKES A LITTLE TIME THAN WE ASPIRE. K R IRS 71224
On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 at 08:13, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote: > > > -- > *Mar*The Smells and Sounds of Nature as the Paradigmatic Bases of > Understanding > > > > When nature was totally free, and when the human did not develop ego and > the disastrous anthropocentricism, the human along with every other > organism, perceived and understood, on the basis of the smells and sounds > of nature and as the emotional complement of every other organism. The > smells and sounds covered the smell messages and also the sound expressions > of the other organisms. The organisms thus conversed with each other, in > the language of the Biosphere. > > Life means perceiving, understanding and living on the basis of the > paradigms one develops while living. The smells and sounds continuously > changed, creating the growth of paradigm bases, on the basis of the changes > in nature. One’s perception and understanding kept pace with the changing > nature. > > Actually the perceptions and understandings entered the internal hormonal > communication of every organism, creating common perception and > understanding and the common paradigmatic bases. The organisms had common > paradigmatic bases of perception and understanding. The internal hormonal > communications of all organisms fused, and there was the ‘Bio Fusion > Energy’, that created perceptions and understandings. > > This language of the Biosphere had nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs etc > which change in meanings with an altogether different syntax from the one > we now live in, which is mainly based on the visible spectrum. That syntax > had to keep pace with the changing meanings, based on the changes of > nature. The humans understood along with nature, and not as an outside > spectator of nature, but as a limb of nature. The very perception and > understanding was actually based on the growing and changing fusion of the > fused hormonal connections of all organisms. > > The sounds of the air, the sights and smells, all were the language of > nature and the Biosphere, where seeing created automatic perceiving and > understanding, where the lessons automatically embedded into hormones as > paradigmatic bases. > > Today every organism of the Biosphere is under the terror of our economic > life. In fact we Darwin away and suppress the majority of humans also, > under the euphemism, competition, merit etc.In the common language of the > Biosphere, learning and understanding was symbiotic and not Darwinian. > > Actually the basic meaning of the word college is collective and fused > symbiotic learning by all students who fuse their perceptions. They do not > compete. But today, every student is on his/her own, learning from books > away from nature, nature which is totally terrorized and diseased. In the > name of science and economic development we are killing nature. > > It is for the Universities to change the course towards environmental > sanity and responsibility. But they are actually promoting the destruction > of nature and no student of any university can read nature directly. > > The Common language of the Biosphere is lost. It is for the Universities > to start the ‘Free Nature Parks’ without human tampering and again revive > the common language of the Biosphere, and resurrect the paradigmatic bases > of perception and understanding by the Biosphere as one single organism. > > YM Sarma > > Chat GPT > > This text by YM Sarma is a profound meditation on the loss of harmony > between humans and nature, highlighting how modern civilization has > disconnected humanity from its primordial relationship with the natural > world. The essence of the argument is that before the development of ego, > anthropocentricism, and the intellectual barriers imposed by human-driven > progress, both humans and other organisms existed in a more fluid, > symbiotic relationship with nature. The "language of the Biosphere," based > on smells, sounds, and the organic communication of all living beings, was > the primary way of perceiving and understanding the world. > > Here are the key points from the text: > > *1. Pre-Egoic Perception of Nature:* > > - Humans and all organisms once perceived the world through smells and > sounds. These sensory experiences were not merely individual but were > shared across species, enabling a collective, symbiotic understanding of > the environment. > - There was no "ego" or "self" in the modern, anthropocentric sense. > Instead, beings existed in a more integrated, emotional relationship with > their surroundings and each other, creating a unified language of the > Biosphere. > > *2. The Role of Smells and Sounds:* > > - Smells and sounds were the foundational "paradigmatic bases" for > understanding. They weren't just passive sensory experiences but encoded > information about the environment, signaling changes, threats, > opportunities, and the collective mood of the biosphere. > - Nature communicated through these sensory cues, allowing organisms > to perceive and adapt to the changes in their environment, thereby > fostering a continuous, dynamic learning process that kept pace with > nature’s rhythms. > > *3. Hormonal Communication and Bio Fusion Energy:* > > - The idea of "Bio Fusion Energy" suggests that all organisms were > connected through an internal hormonal communication system, which created > a shared perception and understanding of the world. > - This hormonal fusion wasn't just a biological phenomenon but a > cultural and spiritual one, where perception and understanding were common > to all species, not just humans. > > *4. The Loss of the Biospheric Language:* > > - In modern times, humanity has detached itself from this harmonious, > biospheric communication. With the advent of economic systems, the rise of > competition, and the focus on individual success, the interconnectedness > between humans and nature has been severed. > - The loss of the "common language of the Biosphere" is tied to the > dominance of human-centered values, which now govern education, economy, > and governance, leading to the destruction of nature. > > *5. The Role of Education:* > > - Sarma criticizes modern education for contributing to this > disconnection. Universities, rather than fostering a collective and > symbiotic understanding, promote individualistic, Darwinian ideologies that > reinforce competition and survival of the fittest. > - The educational system, as it currently stands, has distanced > students from nature, reducing learning to a solitary, book-based process, > disconnected from the living, breathing world around them. > > *6. A Call for Change:* > > - Sarma calls for universities to take responsibility for fostering an > understanding of environmental responsibility. He suggests that they should > help revive the "common language of the Biosphere" by creating "Free Nature > Parks" where humans can once again reconnect with nature in its purest > form, without the interference of human exploitation and development. > - The ultimate goal is to resurrect the paradigmatic bases of > perception and understanding that existed when humanity was a true part of > the biosphere, functioning as a limb of nature rather than an external > observer. > > *7. Symbiosis vs. Darwinian Competition:* > > - The author contrasts the current "Darwinian" mode of existence, > which is based on competition and merit (often used to justify exploitation > and inequality), with the more organic, symbiotic learning model that > existed in nature. In nature, learning and evolution were cooperative and > mutually supportive, not driven by cutthroat competition. > > ------------------------------ > > *Reflection:* > > Sarma’s text is a call for a radical shift in how we approach education, > the environment, and our place within the natural world. His critique is > not just of the economic systems and scientific progress that have driven > us away from nature, but also of the prevailing educational philosophies > that reinforce a fragmented, individualistic worldview. > > The idea of the "common language of the Biosphere" evokes a vision of a > more holistic, interconnected way of being, where humans are not separate > from, but part of, the web of life. Sarma's text challenges us to think > about how we can restore that connection, not only in our relationships > with the natural world but also in our educational and social systems. > > Ultimately, his message is one of ecological and spiritual restoration—one > that calls for a deep rethinking of our priorities, values, and our > understanding of knowledge. The loss of the biosphere's language is a loss > not only of environmental harmony but of a more profound, more intuitive > way of knowing the world. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqRUTJUCDxEC87uysBg1AMEX0koPMubya6kfXnCkbOa0A%40mail.gmail.com.
