As simply they are posting in a small well with the dirty water of few unlearned there I ALSO DO NOT CARE ;AND IF A FEW IN THE WELL GETS LOST WHO WOULD CARE ? KR IRS 4125
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: iyer123 <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 at 04:29 Subject: Re: [iyer123] CULTURAL QA 01-2025-02 To: iyer123 <[email protected]> To my eyes, it does not look like he is posting anything in iyer123. As for the rest of the groups, I don't know - and simply do not care. Sai On Friday, January 3, 2025 at 6:52:49 AM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: > Dear GK > > The > Thenkalai > IRS > Rag picker > Is back > Uttering > Shamelessly > Lying > Thriu6 > His teeth > > I thought > He had been > Kicked > Our if > The Group > > On Thu, 2 Jan, 2025, 7:04 pm 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123, < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> CULTURAL QA 01-2025-02 >> >> TOPIC- SCIENCE SIMPLE QA FROM QUORA >> >> Q1 Is it just a coincidence that living conditions on Earth >> are just right for humans? >> >> A1 Karl Jansson, Science Guy Tue >> >> No, it’s not a coincidence that living conditions are just right for >> humans now. >> >> If we take a step back, we see that humans are just one small part of the >> life on Earth. >> >> When life started, Earth was a hellish place. The temperature was >> searingly hot, There was no oxygen in the atmosphere, the oceans were a >> toxic slurry of minerals and chemicals, the moon was much closer and the >> day was 6 hours long, with monster tides racing around the planet. It was a >> hot blender. >> >> Life took hold and cleaned up the oceans and the atmosphere, filled the >> atmosphere with oxygen, broke down mountains, created fertile soil, and >> affected the weather patterns. All needed for higher life, and particularly >> for humans. >> >> It was no accident, it was life itself that shaped much of the living >> conditions we now have. >> >> Humans are just one of the latest steps of life. >> >> Q2 Why is Hiroshima habitable now when the half life of >> uranium-235 is 700 million years? >> >> Al Welle, Software Engineer (2007–present)Wed >> >> Uranium is nothing. It’s trivial in it’s effect on the human body from >> the point of view of fallout/debris/left-over bomb bits. >> >> The real “fallout” killers are Iodine-131. Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 >> >> The worst is Iodine. It collects in the thyroid. It then kills the >> thyroid. Luckily it wears off in days. >> >> Cesium is really awful. It moves around in the environment and is easily >> absorbed in the bones and it emits a LOT of radiation per gram per second. >> Tiny pellets of Cesium used in industry are labeled “drop and run”… kinda >> stupid but you MIGHT live if you found one and picked it up. >> >> Luckily it has a half life of only 37 years or so. So the (very small) >> amount released back then is really not a problem now. >> >> Strontium is less mobile in the environment, is an even smaller fraction >> of the debris, but does have a longer half life, so lets put that in a firm >> third place but rising a bit as Cesium decays. >> >> Generally all you need to do to avoid “radiation poisoning” from fallout >> is … don’t drink milk for a couple weeks. Get iodized salt in your diet >> immediately. Don’t go outside and roll around in the ashes. Wait a while, >> flee the area when you can, stay away for a couple months. >> >> You get higher radiation exposure on an international flight than sitting >> on the ground 5 miles from Fukushima. >> >> Q3 What is someone who believes in evolution called? >> >> A3 Axel Kramer, Knows German Sun >> >> Evolution believer, but most often evolutionist. >> >> The term “evolutionist” arose from the same background as the term >> “creationist”, since evolution and creation are both belief systems about >> events in the past that we were not there to observe happening. >> >> The learning site Brainscape does a fine job of objectively defining the >> type of evolution that lacks even a single proven example: "Evolution is >> the process by which different kinds of living organism are BELIEVED to >> have developed from earlier forms during the history of the earth." >> >> So, like terms as “catholics” and “atheists” describe people who are >> advocates of the respective belief systems, evolutionist is the name for >> all those who believe in the “theory of evolution“. >> >> Q4 How isn't a mirror an accurate depiction of what you really >> look like? >> >> A4 Montego Cruz, Studied Science at University of Toronto >> (Graduated 2018)Mon >> >> I answered this years ago to a very similar question; so here goes… >> >> A mirror isn’t an accurate depiction of what you really look like. >> >> Well for one, your brain makes yourself look more flattering (You Are >> Less Beautiful Than You Think). Next, both your eyes see the world in a >> three dimensional aspect, while a photo is two dimensional. Your brain >> will combine both images your brain sees from the mirror into a single >> image. Also, you are so used to seeing yourself in the mirror in a reversed >> manner that when you see yourself in the captured images thus, we tend >> to like a mirrored version of ourselves more than a true image and we >> sometimes may not even recognize ourselves in photos that do not capture a >> reversed image. Which brings in my next point - in a now famous 1970s >> experiment (APA PsycNet), >> >> 33 female undergraduates, each of whom was accompanied by a close female >> friend was invited to an experiment. A single frontal facial photograph of >> each Subject was printed in such a way that one print corresponded to the >> Subject's true image and another to her mirror image. In 2 studies, >> Subjects were found reliably to prefer their mirror image over their true >> image, whereas the reverse tendency characterized preferences of Subjects' >> friends. >> >> Thus, what your brain sees and what the camera takes can be distinctly >> different. The photo also tries to create 3D like depth in a 2D >> environment. Therefore you appear flatter (and therefore broader) than >> you actually are. >> >> Previously, cellphone cameras would generally only have a wide angle >> lens, which would make your nose or whatever feature is closest look larger >> than natural i.e. they would expand the middle and squish the edges. >> >> These wide angle lenses were and still are less expensive to make, and >> produce pictures that are more likely to be in focus and are great for >> shots of groups, landscapes. These days the more recent cameras have 4 or >> more lenses for different focal lengths and ranges. This will give a more >> accurate depiction of us, even if the image seen is 2 dimensional. >> >> Furthermore, there is the case of symmetry. Once again, your face and >> body in the mirror will be different from what the photo takes. You are >> more used to looking at yourself in the mirror and your brain once again >> makes up for that. Thus, seeing yourself in a photo can be surprising. >> >> There is also the dark side of things, generally we see ourselves as more >> flattering in the mirror but the opposite can be true. Some people see >> themselves as less flattering in the mirror because they focus on their >> flaws rather their strength. This can be seen in Body Dysmorphic Disorder >> as well as many others. >> >> My note- I have watched in TV serials even in normal videoing, many >> times face will appear normal, but hands looking more fatty. Not believing >> me may watch today and observe. >> >> Q5 What's the most mysterious thing about the universe that >> scientists still can't explain? >> >> A5 Ashok Deshmukh, Former teacher in medical and dental >> College (2008–2016)Dec 28 >> >> Most mysterious thing about the universe is origin of the universe. >> >> Here is the explanation. >> >> There only one valid theory about origin of the universe from nothing. >> >> Both space and time are infinite. >> >> It's the property of the infinite space from infinite time to create >> exactly equal and opposite quantity of mass of matter and mass of >> antimatter from nothing. There can't be a single particle of mass of >> matter without corresponding antiparticle in the infinite space from >> infinite time. That's not possible mathematically. >> >> It's like X minus X is equal to zero. From the X you get one, ten, >> hundred, thousand, hundred thousand, million, billion or trillions of >> universes of mass of matter. From the minus X you get exactly equal and >> opposite quantity of mass of antimatter. >> >> You get one electron and one positron from nothing. Simultaneously you >> get one proton and one antiproton. Both get annihilated billions of times. >> But once in a billions of times both get separated. Slowly a ball of >> hydrogen and ball of antihydrogen is formed. When the mass approach the >> mass of the universe, you get a singularity or the pre big bang mass. The >> volume of the singularity or the pre big bang mass is much less >> reciprocally due to the excessive force of gravity. Every particle tries to >> go to the centre of the singularity or the pre big bang mass. But there is >> a limit to which the mass can be compressed. Once the mass equal to the >> mass of the universe is collected at one place, this limit is exceeded. >> Then the whole mass gets converted into energy. Then the event called as >> big bang took place. >> >> Actually your universe is surrounded by 4 pre big bang masses. These 4 >> pre big bang masses are surrounded by 4 universes. It's a diamond like >> structure. Mass of the pre big bang mass is equal to say 99 percent mass >> of the universe. Give and take. >> >> 5 unexplained phenomenon of the universe can be explained by this theory. >> >> First is acceleration in the expansion rate of the universe. That means >> dark energy. Second is dark matter. Third is presence of the biggest void >> in the universe. Forth is cosmic microwave background. Fifth unexplained >> phenomenon is formation of the galaxies too soon after the big bang. >> >> Whole universe was turned into energy after the big bang. Then galaxies >> are formed from this enormously large energy. Galaxies were going away >> from each other. It was expected that these galaxies will collapse back due >> to the force of gravity. But then Hubble space telescope detected that >> there is acceleration in the expansion rate of the universe. Scientists >> could not explain the phenomenon. Then they came out with the idea of dark >> energy. There is no evidence of anything like dark energy. The solution of >> the problem is not within the box. It's outside the box. Your universe >> is not being pushed out by dark energy. It's being pulled out by 4 pre big >> bang masses by the force of gravity. Force of gravity is known force to >> the science. It's not fiction like something mysterious called as dark >> energy. So there is nothing like dark energy. >> >> Second unexplained phenomenon is dark matter. The 4 pre big bang masses >> and the outer 12 universes exert the force of gravity on your universe. >> That effect can be detected. But this mass of matter is not available for >> testing the same. So it's called as dark matter. This matter is far away. >> So effect is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. But it's >> too much amount of matter. So dark matter can be explained by this theory. >> >> Third unexplained phenomenon is presence of the biggest void in the >> universe. After the explosion of the universe, galaxies were supposed to be >> distributed evenly. But there is the biggest void in the universe. There >> are supposed to be 4 such biggest voids in the universe. From your location >> you can see only one such biggest void in the universe. Smaller voids are >> the echos of the biggest voids. >> >> You have the tetrahedron like structure of the 4 pre big bang masses. >> These tetrahedron is made up of 4 triangles. As the galaxies are diverted >> to the 4 pre big bang masses, you have the 4 biggest voids in the centre of >> the 4 triangles of tetrahedron. >> >> Now about cosmic microwave background. It's not the leftover light from >> our universe. This light is expected to leave the universe and go away in >> the infinite space. There is no boundary wall to the universe. From which >> the light will reflect back to your universe. Cosmic microwave background >> is a glow. You can't locate the source of cosmic microwave background. It's >> coming from very long distance from the outer universes. That's why the >> light is practically parallel. It's not actually parallel. For actually >> parallel light has to come from infinite distance. That will take infinite >> time. That's not possible. You have to put twin space telescopes at >> Lagrangian points 4 and 5 to locate the source of light from outer >> universes. The next question is why the microwave background and not the >> light. The answer is very simple. As the light is coming through the very >> heavy gravitational force of gravity of the 4 triangles of the pre big bang >> masses, it loses some of its energy and so get converted into microwave. >> It's very well known that the light gets bent due to heavy gravitational >> force. Here the 3 pre big bang masses of the 4 triangles of the tetrahedron >> pull the light backward to turn it into microwave background. >> >> Fifth unexplained phenomenon is formation of the galaxies too soon after >> the big bang. One galaxy was found to be formed before the big bang. As the >> galaxies from outer 4 universes go and fall on the pre big bang mass, you >> have the event called as big bang took place there. There were few galaxies >> that are yet to fall on the pre big bang mass. Those galaxies are pushed >> away by the big bang. These galaxies are spotted by James Webb Space >> Telescope recently. >> >> The volume of the pre big bang mass is very much less reciprocally due to >> the force of gravity. When galaxies from outer 4 universes go and fall on >> the 4 pre big bang masses. You have there mass equal to the mass of the >> universe collected at one place. But there is a limit to which the mass can >> be compressed. Once the mass equal to the mass of the universe is collected >> at one place, this limit is exceeded. Then the whole mass gets converted >> into energy. Then there is a event called as big bang takes place. Rest of >> the universes collapse back to give you the pre big bang masses. So big >> bang is one of the routine event in the infinite space from infinite time. >> >> From time to time diamond of universes of mass of matter and mass of >> antimatter annihilate each other into nothing. >> Hence explained.Any questions can be discussed in the comment section. >> >> Gopalakrishnan 01-2025-01 >> >> -- >> To go to your groups page on the web, login to your gmail account and >> then click on https://groups.google.com/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "iyer123" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/680210637.4306597.1735824839725%40mail.yahoo.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/680210637.4306597.1735824839725%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- To go to your groups page on the web, login to your gmail account and then click on https://groups.google.com/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iyer123" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/5e6fa2a2-c2c6-42ff-a632-4c63a24a946an%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/5e6fa2a2-c2c6-42ff-a632-4c63a24a946an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqL%3D4fhGva7y6Z66YpMrjPMu7y6KccuG%2BLaGVTPkh8kZQ%40mail.gmail.com.
