Lee Kuan Yew Published 22 March 2015 BBC
He argued that people needed to be shaped by governments into nations - and
was unapologetic about the steps he took to do this.
Split from Malaysia
Transcript of an emotional press conference, external on 9 August 1965,
after Malaysia voted to expel Singapore
"*For me it is a moment of anguish* because all my life... I have believed
in merger and the unity of these two territories. You know, it's a people,
connected by geography, economics, and ties of kinship. *Would you mind if
we stop for a while?* [pause for Mr Lee to regain his composure] --1
[Several paragraphs later] *There is nothing to be worried about it.* Many
things will go on just as usual. *But be firm, be calm. We are going to
have a multi-racial nation in Singapore... Everybody will have his place:
equal; language, culture, religion."* 2
I don’t think the expressions of Lee were neither as expressed in Q
and A or as expressed by the useless senior member of Iyer 123.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MORE FROM LEE:
Press freedom
Address to the General Assembly of the International Press Institute ,
externalat Helsinki on 9 June 1971
"What role would men and governments in new countries like the mass media
to play?... The mass media can help to present Singapore's problems simply
and clearly and then explain how if they support certain programmes and
policies these problems can be solved. More important, we want the mass
media to reinforce, not to undermine, the cultural values and social
attitudes being inculcated in our schools and universities.
[Several paragraphs later] Freedom of the press, freedom of the news media,
must be subordinated to the overriding needs of the integrity of Singapore,
and to the primacy of purpose of an elected government."
Role of the state
Speech to the National Day Rally in 1986, quoted in the Straits Times on 20
April 1987
"I am often accused of interfering in the private lives of citizens. Yes,
if I did not, had I not done that, we wouldn't be here today.
And I say without the slightest remorse, that we wouldn't be here, we would
not have made economic progress, if we had not intervened on very personal
matters - who your neighbour is, how you live, the noise you make, how you
spit, or what language you use. We decide what is right."
The West
Interview with Foreign Policy, external, March/April 1994
"Let me be frank; if we did not have the good points of the West to guide
us, we wouldn't have got out of our backwardness. We would have been a
backward economy with a backward society. But we do not want all of the
West."
[Responding to a separate question]
"Let me give you an example that encapsulates the whole difference between
America and Singapore. America has a vicious drug problem. How does it
solve it? It goes around the world helping other anti-narcotic agencies to
try and stop the suppliers... Singapore does not have that option.
What we can do is to pass a law which says that any customs officer or
policeman who sees anybody in Singapore behaving suspiciously... can
require that man to have his urine tested. If the sample is found to
contain drugs, the man immediately goes for treatment. In America if you
did that it would be an invasion of the individual's rights and you would
be sued."
Political opponents
On JB Jeyaretnam, a lawyer and opposition lawmaker who called for greater
freedoms but was bankrupted by Mr Lee via the courts, in Lee Kuan Yew, The
Man And His Ideas, 1997
"If you are a troublemaker… it's our job to politically destroy you. Put it
this way. As long as JB Jeyaretnam stands for what he stands for - a
thoroughly destructive force - we will knock him. Everybody knows that in
my bag I have a hatchet, and a very sharp one. You take me on, I take my
hatchet, we meet in the cul-de-sac."
The Singapore model
Interview with the New York Times,, external 29 August 2007
"We knew that if we were just like our neighbours, we would die. Because
we've got nothing to offer against what they have to offer. So we had to
produce something which is different and better than what they have. It's
incorrupt. It's efficient. It's meritocratic. It works.
We are pragmatists... Does it work? Let's try it and if it does work, fine,
let's continue it. If it doesn't work, toss it out, try another one. We are
not enamoured with any ideology."
Future challenges
Interview with the New York Times , externalon 13 Sept 2010
"The regret is there's such a narrow base to build this enormous edifice,
so I've got to tell the next generation, please do not take for granted
what's been built.
If you forget that this is a small island which we are built upon and reach
a 100 storeys-high tower block and may go up to 150 if you are wise. But if
you believe that it's permanent, it will come tumbling down and you will
never get a second chance."
His legacy
Interview with the New York Times , externalon 13 Sept 2010
"The final verdict will not be in the obituaries. The final verdict will be
when the PhD students dig out the archives, read my old papers, assess what
my enemies have said, sift the evidence and seek the truth.
I'm not saying that everything I did was right, but everything I did was
for an honourable purpose."
KR IRS 6125
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqQEO-no8-TYjzL8UnE0b3gYemtzOaHAGhT%2B4020E683g%40mail.gmail.com.
