*Anti-national NGOs + greedy lawyers*
*The Supreme Court keeps its eyes closed but a trial court judge has
mustered up the courage to order to break this illusion*

On January 3, 2025, NIA court special judge Vivekanand Sharan Tripathi (VS
Tripathi) convicted 28 accused from the Muslim community for the brutal
murder of Abhishek alias Chandan Gupta of Kasganj on January 26, 2018 and
sentenced them to life imprisonment while acquitting 2 accused giving them
the benefit of doubt - this murder was committed by people from the Muslim
community during Chandan's Tiranga Yatra

 -*Apart from the punishment, Justice Tripathi raised another topic and
that is the illusion of money of lawyers on which the judges of the Supreme
Court and every High Court turn a blind eye -

Justice Tripathi, while pronouncing the sentence, raised questions on the
role of "national and foreign NGOs engaged in defending the culprits" and
sent a copy of his order to the Union Home Ministry and the Bar Council of
India to curb them

 *Justice Tripathi also said in his order that “It should be investigated
from where these NGOs are being funded, who is funding them, what is their
collective objective; it is alleged that whenever a terrorist is caught,
such NGOs raise big names to advocate for him and fund him and this is a
matter of great concern for the country*”

 -The court has named the following 7 NGOs / organizations in its order --

Citizens of Justice and Peace, Mumbai;-

 People's Union for Civil Liberties, Delhi;-

 Rihaee Manch;-

Alliance for Justice and Accountability, New York;-

Indian American Muslim Council, Washington DC;-

South Asia Solidarity Group, London;

and-

Legal Cell of Jamiat Ulema Hind


Justice Tripathi's order is truly historic and I had also made a similar
demand to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. What is the fee of lawyers
practising in the High Court and Supreme Court, it should be in the public
domain and their assets & liability statement should also be released in
public and it should also be told how much income tax they have paid every
year; Lawyers' fees should be taken only through cheque;

Affidavits should be sought from 6 top lawyers in the Supreme Court as to
who paid their fees so that it can be ascertained whether funding was done
by any terror organisation or Not

Ashwini Upadhyay's petition demanding the expulsion of Rohingya Bangladeshi
intruders is pending since 2017 6 top-class lawyers appeared in the Supreme
Court for the 2 Rohingyas Mohammad Salimullah / Mohammad Shaqir who looked
like beggars, whose names were -Dr Rajiv Dhawan, Prashant Bhushan, Dr
Ashwini Kumar, Colin Gonsalves, Fali Nariman (now dead) and Kapil Sibal-10
top lawyers appear to oppose Ashwini Upadhyay's petition to stop religious
conversion.

22 top lawyers appear to oppose Upadhyay's petition challenging the Places
of Worship Act and this includes MPs, MLAs and former Law Minister, Home
Minister, Foreign Minister and Education Minister. Because of such lawyers,
that case is still pending.
Just in October, 2024, another NGO Social Jurist His heart was also
breaking for the Rohingya Muslims and he filed a petition in the Delhi High
Court demanding an order to the Center to admit the “Rohingya refugee
children” in schools -

When the High Court rejected the petition saying that Rohingyas are
foreigners and have not been legally allowed to enter the country and they
are a threat to the security of the country, then this NGO has now reached
the Supreme Court - Who is funding it

-There are many such lawyers and NGOs, the funding of all of them should be
investigated

 In the interest of the country, forward this message as much as possible
so that the autocratic and insensitive judiciary becomes accountable to the
public.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CABC81ZcGchf%2BRiv4rELMBHYGcCjcr43JzAOZs-mFHod%2B8XziKA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to