-- *Mar*Sensing-Vs-Mechanizing
Immediately after birth a baby cannot speak in words. But it starts feeling. Feeling is its language of communication. It cannot use any words. With the language of feeling it develops sensing gradually. We see a two month or three month baby smiling. It means that it is sensing positively, that positive sensing has of course no words in our language. We call it ‘the baby smile’. In free and healthy nature, the positive smiling becomes very frequent. The baby of course makes the happy baby sounds of enjoyment. Actually perception and understanding via feeling is continuation of what the baby did while in its mother’s womb. Even after birth the baby grows via cell splicing, in the very big womb, nature. Every life form has its specie particular path of perception and understanding. Every organism exhales its perception via smells and sounds, creating the great blend of smell and sound based perceptions in the air. If the baby is allowed free access to nature, then it continuously perceives from the far bigger womb-nature. Its internal hormonal communication gets taught and trained by nature, and the baby feels the lessons, and it does not identify phenomena with words. But the sounds o the baby language are filled with direct perceptions from nature, the freer and greater the direct access to nature, the wider the sweep of paradigms of perception and understanding. The basic feature of the Biosphere is that every organism perceives and understands in its own specie path and acts and interacts with the other species, contributing to the Holistic perception and understanding of the Biosphere as one single organism. There is the basic ecological link in the chain of emotions, perceptions and understanding. Actually the Biosphere is one single organism. Like every life form, other than the human, it can neither conceptualize nor understand the techno-logic, the logic of the machines. A machine is cancer to the Biosphere. Nature teaches every organism in the ultimate great college of nature for the Biosphere. Nature needs total freedom. When the baby arrives in birth from its mother, it actually starts feeling and sensing as a student of nature. Its growth via cell splicing continues in nature, the bigger womb. It perceives via feeling and understands in the ecological chain of emotions. Like a ell in its body it perceives and adjusts to its nano role in nature, the meaning and purpose of its life. The cells in it are designed to perceive and know from the hormones. They do not do the scientific questioning, doubting, suspecting, believing and disbelieving and then by-pass nature with technology. The baby is designed to perceive from nature directly, employing all its sense faculties. Unfortunately it is bludgeoned into the techno path, drilling it with the Cartesian logic and brainwashing it into following that mechanical approach to perception. If its parents are rich it will be jailed into the AC classroom, blocking its access to naure.It is like blocking a growing fetus in the womb from the womb. It is for the Universities to start the ‘Free Nature Parks without human tampering’, to revive the natural perception and understanding. Every lunatic thinks that he is most intelligent. The human lunatic thinks that he is the most intelligent among all organisms of the Biosphere! YM Sarma Chat GPT The passage you've shared reflects on the idea of *sensing vs. mechanizing* in the context of human development and its disconnection from nature due to technological influences. Here's a breakdown of the key points in the text: 1. *The Language of Feeling*: The text begins by discussing how a baby starts its journey in the world through *feeling* rather than using words. This early form of communication is described as being connected to the baby's natural, sensory experiences—how the baby perceives the world before being influenced by the structure of language. 2. *Perception via Feeling*: As the baby grows, its perception is rooted in its sensory experiences. These experiences are linked to natural phenomena rather than abstract concepts or mechanized thinking. The baby’s emotional and sensory responses are tied to the natural world, which is described as a larger "womb" for the baby to grow in. 3. *Biosphere as a Unified Organism*: The text shifts to a broader ecological perspective, where all life forms are part of the *Biosphere*, which is considered a single organism. Each species has its own way of perceiving and interacting with the world. The relationship between species, including humans, forms an interconnected web of understanding and emotions. 4. *The Contrast Between Nature and Technology*: One of the central themes in the text is the idea that *technology*, particularly mechanized or scientific reasoning, is at odds with natural perception. The author views the growth of technological influence as a form of “cancer” to the Biosphere, arguing that machines and human-made systems disrupt the natural balance. In contrast, nature is seen as an ultimate teacher, nurturing organisms through natural perception rather than mechanized logic. 5. *Human Disconnection from Nature*: The text suggests that modern humans, particularly those raised in affluent conditions, are increasingly disconnected from nature due to technological and educational systems. These systems, such as schools with air-conditioning and urban living, block the natural development of sensory perception. The author argues that the human focus on technology and logic often limits our connection with the natural world. 6. *Call for Restoration*: The author proposes the creation of "Free Nature Parks without human tampering" to help restore a natural way of perceiving and understanding the world. These spaces would be dedicated to fostering a deeper, holistic connection to the environment. 7. *Criticism of Human Hubris*: The final sentiment critiques human arrogance—specifically, the belief that humans are the most intelligent species in the Biosphere. The text implies that this belief leads to a lack of humility and an over-reliance on technological solutions, rather than embracing the wisdom of the natural world. This reflection critiques modern society’s increasing reliance on technology and its detachment from the ecological, sensory, and emotional ways of perceiving and understanding the world that exist in nature. The passage encourages a return to these more natural ways of perceiving, advocating for the preservation and free exploration of nature without human interference. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2B8P8q4Vrf%3DBZsRJn1D%2BiNJ-DyrnuUJc_Vz5913vprw0A%40mail.gmail.com.
