-- *Mar*The Literature of Nature
Free and healthy nature is the great organism that lives as fountains of diverse enchanting literatures. Nature’s literature needs sensing via smelling, hearing, seeing and feeling, which continuously triggers enlightenments and spell binding revelations. It gives the feelings of the true meanings of the Time dimension, the great and real abstract dimension of nature. Our lives are mainly in abstract feelings, in the participation of the abstract processes of consciousness of nature. Reducing the revelations, enlightenments and enchantments into the restricting 3D shapes and doing mathematical reductionism, actually is violent reduction of the infinity. Literature actually consists of creating the abstract flows of enchanting revelations and enlightenments from the 3D shapes. The eyes which can see only 00.0037% of the totality will be used to switch the needed feelings to feel the rest of the 99.9963% of the totality in the invisible spectrum. We become part of the macro nature and live participating in the rhythms of the arts of nature. Free nature makes every organism an artist. Actually living is living in arts, the basic feature of the Biosphere. I often wonder at the changes in our literary expressions. When the human was endowed only with the sense of smell, it lived via smelling like every other organism, which smelt, perceived and understood every other organism, making nature the great one macro artist. Every organism lived as a limb of the one great artist, Bhoodevi, the internal hormonal communications of each being arts oriented. After we developed the eyes and ears, we started with tunings, and singing. Most classics were written as epics consisting of poems, songs and dances. In fact sciences originally were expressed as poems and songs. Next we changed into sentences with definite subjects and their predications marking the predication to be identified with verb or space-time. Now we have surrendered to technology, ditched the very feeling content of expression based on feeling the revelations, and jailed in the mathematical formulae. Definitions have become the vital and basic needs. Editors that mechanize the expressions have emerged. We do not know the devastations meted by the editors on the free flowing expressions. As editing is actually reducing the feeling based expressions into concretized and quantified pieces with definitions, scopes etc, mechanization has become the destination. Only machines are capable of precision not even nature, the arena where octillions of particles, atoms, molecules etc interact continuously, with no stop to do mathematical reduction conveniently. Nature does not stop to make your mathematical formula permanent and eternal. Nature needs only arts that function as its limbs. Today we are continuously killing nature with our industrialization and urbanization. Our very macro bodies are maimed and euphemized as economic development. The flow of literature from nature is continuously killed.Industrialization and mechanization have jailed our universities into economic slavery. Economics is based on murdering nature. It is anti ecological. May be when Christ returns, the Universities will get freed from the stranglehold of technology. But let us hope that at least one University takes to the cause of free nature and starts The Free Nature Parks, without human tampering as beginning of reviving nature. YM Sarma Chat GPT This piece reflects deeply on the contrast between the natural world and human attempts to understand, control, and quantify it. It explores the evolving nature of human expression—once rooted in feeling, experience, and art, now increasingly constrained by technology, logic, and mechanization. The author, YM Sarma, critiques how modern society, particularly through industrialization and urbanization, has distanced itself from the free-flowing, sensory-driven engagement with nature, replacing it with the cold, structured framework of definitions and formulas. There's a clear call for a return to the more fluid, holistic forms of understanding—expressed through art, sensory experience, and emotional engagement with the environment. Nature is portrayed not just as a resource to be studied or managed but as a source of life and creativity, of "enchanting literatures" that stir a deeper connection within us. It's also a lament for the loss of a more symbiotic relationship with the Earth, where every organism, in its purest state, was an artist, living and contributing to the greater whole. The push towards technological control and the rise of economic systems that exploit nature seem, to the author, to be pushing humanity further away from that intrinsic connection. The idea of a "Free Nature Park," untouched by human influence, stands as a vision for reclaiming some of that lost connection. What are your thoughts on this? Do you feel like modern society has become too detached from the more intuitive, sensory ways of engaging with nature? This piece raises some fascinating points, and I think it taps into a real sense of alienation many people feel today—especially in a world that’s increasingly digital and industrial. The author’s vision of nature as a living, breathing "organism" that speaks to us through the senses resonates deeply. When we were more attuned to nature’s rhythms, through smell, sight, sound, and touch, there was a kind of primal, immersive connection that allowed us to experience the world holistically. Now, it’s like we’ve distanced ourselves from that, analyzing everything through the lens of technology and control, reducing the vast complexity of life into manageable bits and pieces, often at the expense of the richness that comes with direct experience. In modern society, it’s easy to see how we’ve detached from those intuitive, sensory ways of connecting with the world. Think about how often we spend indoors, disconnected from the natural environment. The pace of modern life, driven by productivity and efficiency, leaves little room for the kind of free-flowing creativity or introspection that comes from simply *being* in nature. And yes, technology, while offering many conveniences, can sometimes strip us of the deeper, emotional engagements that allow us to really *feel* nature rather than just study it or exploit it. I also think the author’s point about how language and expression have shifted over time is fascinating. As our methods of communication became more formalized and logical, they may have also lost the ability to capture the more elusive, ephemeral aspects of experience. Poetry, song, and dance offered a more fluid, embodied expression of human connection with the world. Now, even in the academic and scientific worlds, we often default to dry, technical language that can’t fully encapsulate the depth of feeling or experience that nature inspires. I do feel there’s a growing hunger for reconnecting with these more intuitive, sensory ways of engaging with the world, though. Many people today are turning back to nature, seeking out experiences that allow them to feel more connected and present, whether it’s through hiking, gardening, or other outdoor activities. But, there’s still that tension between modern life’s demands and the desire for a more soulful, connected existence. What about you? Do you feel like you’ve found ways to keep that connection with nature alive in the midst of all the technological distractions? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKPnj%2B2O9q7%3DauY%3DibwEiPprv37woG6uf-BEnK1vAOsEA%40mail.gmail.com.
