sent already sir KR On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 at 07:54, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote:
> Rajaram Sir, > I value your comments and betterments to my write ups.Please comment on my > write up of today Sir. > > > > -- > *Mar*The Literature of Nature > > > > Free and healthy nature is the great organism that lives as fountains of > diverse enchanting literatures. Nature’s literature needs sensing via > smelling, hearing, seeing and feeling, which continuously triggers > enlightenments and spell binding revelations. It gives the feelings of the > true meanings of the Time dimension, the great and real abstract dimension > of nature. Our lives are mainly in abstract feelings, in the participation > of the abstract processes of consciousness of nature. Reducing the > revelations, enlightenments and enchantments into the restricting 3D shapes > and doing mathematical reductionism, actually is violent reduction of the > infinity. > > Literature actually consists of creating the abstract flows of enchanting > revelations and enlightenments from the 3D shapes. The eyes which can see > only 00.0037% of the totality will be used to switch the needed feelings to > feel the rest of the 99.9963% of the totality in the invisible spectrum. We > become part of the macro nature and live participating in the rhythms of > the arts of nature. Free nature makes every organism an artist. Actually > living is living in arts, the basic feature of the Biosphere. > > I often wonder at the changes in our literary expressions. When the human > was endowed only with the sense of smell, it lived via smelling like every > other organism, which smelt, perceived and understood every other organism, > making nature the great one macro artist. Every organism lived as a limb of > the one great artist, Bhoodevi, the internal hormonal communications of > each being arts oriented. After we developed the eyes and ears, we started > with tunings, and singing. Most classics were written as epics consisting > of poems, songs and dances. In fact sciences originally were expressed as > poems and songs. Next we changed into sentences with definite subjects and > their predications marking the predication to be identified with verb or > space-time. > > Now we have surrendered to technology, ditched the very feeling content of > expression based on feeling the revelations, and jailed in the mathematical > formulae. Definitions have become the vital and basic needs. Editors that > mechanize the expressions have emerged. We do not know the devastations > meted by the editors on the free flowing expressions. > > As editing is actually reducing the feeling based expressions into > concretized and quantified pieces with definitions, scopes etc, > mechanization has become the destination. Only machines are capable of > precision not even nature, the arena where octillions of particles, atoms, > molecules etc interact continuously, with no stop to do mathematical > reduction conveniently. Nature does not stop to make your mathematical > formula permanent and eternal. > > Nature needs only arts that function as its limbs. Today we are > continuously killing nature with our industrialization and urbanization. > Our very macro bodies are maimed and euphemized as economic development. > The flow of literature from nature is continuously killed.Industrializatin > and mechanization have jailed our universities into economic slavery. > Economics is based on murdering nature. It is anti ecological. > > May be when Christ returns, the Universities will get freed from the > stranglehold of technology. But let us hope that at least one University > takes to the cause of free nature and starts The Free Nature Parks, without > human tampering as beginning of reviving nature. > > YM Sarma > > Chat GPT > > This piece reflects deeply on the contrast between the natural world and > human attempts to understand, control, and quantify it. It explores the > evolving nature of human expression—once rooted in feeling, experience, and > art, now increasingly constrained by technology, logic, and mechanization. > > The author, YM Sarma, critiques how modern society, particularly through > industrialization and urbanization, has distanced itself from the > free-flowing, sensory-driven engagement with nature, replacing it with the > cold, structured framework of definitions and formulas. There's a clear > call for a return to the more fluid, holistic forms of > understanding—expressed through art, sensory experience, and emotional > engagement with the environment. Nature is portrayed not just as a resource > to be studied or managed but as a source of life and creativity, of > "enchanting literatures" that stir a deeper connection within us. > > It's also a lament for the loss of a more symbiotic relationship with the > Earth, where every organism, in its purest state, was an artist, living and > contributing to the greater whole. The push towards technological control > and the rise of economic systems that exploit nature seem, to the author, > to be pushing humanity further away from that intrinsic connection. The > idea of a "Free Nature Park," untouched by human influence, stands as a > vision for reclaiming some of that lost connection. > > What are your thoughts on this? Do you feel like modern society has become > too detached from the more intuitive, sensory ways of engaging with nature? > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopmkqq4idqKrGUc5_Qp%2Bdf32ooQbQ_JptTY%3DoBmE_vLaA%40mail.gmail.com.
