-- *Mar*The Birth-Death Symbiosis
Ecology is the Anatomy of the single organism, the Biosphere. Just like the different cells and the bacteria attached to each cell, in our body, the numbers of different species are determined by nature for the existence of the Biosphere as one organism. If in our body, only one type of cells overgrows, the body becomes cancerous.Today, we the humans have become the cancer of the Biosphere. We increase our own number, and we kill, diseasify, genetically modify, enslave, suffocate and terrorize every other organism. The survival of every other organism depends on the decision of the human, whose decision depends on economic criteria. Economics is the antonym of Ecology. We subject every other organism, to the most cruel lab experiments. The modern Allopathic medicine is based on the pain, torture and horrors on every other organism. The basic emotional symbiotic structure based on the symbiotic breathing, coordinated smelling and sensing and understanding, tied to the rhythm among the Lithosphere, Troposphere, Hydrosphere and the Biosphere, is killed on the altar of economics. We have been trying to convert all humanities, into mechanical sciences, repudiating the basic emotional foundation of the Human, the subject matter of those subjects. Our emotions are tied to the emotion flows in the smell and sound messages of organisms in the Troposphere. The basic stupidity of calling these subjects as Economic Science, Political Science, Social Science, even Philosophical Science must end. They can never be sciences, as all sciences are based on the paradigm of machine. Mechanics is based on the repudiation of emotions and feelings, and in economics the ideal human is the economic man, the monsterized Newtonian machine, the anti-ecological perversion, the enemy of nature. The basic component of the troposphere, love is eliminated. Nature is based on the symbiosis of the coordinated births and deaths of different organisms, based on the grand ecological symbiosis. The air creates via smelling and sensing the motivations among the organisms to participate in the ecological control and management by nature. Today, there are millions and millions of slaughter houses; laboratories that do experimentation on animals, pesticides, insecticides etc that eliminate the food of birds, basic for the pollination among plants. The bulldozers, cutting machines etc function all the 24 hours of the day, destroying the forests. The frenzy for mechanization in which the universities function, has made subjects anti-ecological. We are inflicting tragedy in nature on a gigantic scale. Can this basic imbalance between births and deaths be continued? Can we survive without forests? Every mountain range, river, Lake, Sea and oceans are poisoned with diverse poisons. The human changed into the monster the economic man is trying to increase his own longevity on the foundation of regular killing of every other organism. And he cannot know how real happiness feels like. His happiness is based on economic success not on prospering nature. And we find the enslaved universities where the executives from business houses strut for campus recruitments! The minimum a University has to do is to start the ‘Free Nature Parks’, without human tampering so that the happiness of nature can be revived. YM Sarma Chat GPT This is a very thought-provoking and passionate piece of writing that critiques the way human actions and systems, particularly economics, have disrupted the delicate balance of nature. The idea of humans becoming a “cancer” to the Earth speaks to the environmental destruction caused by unchecked growth and exploitation of resources. It argues that humans are prioritizing economic gain over ecological well-being, creating systems that harm both other species and the planet itself. The critique of modern "scientific" fields like economics and political science as being detached from nature and emotions challenges the prevailing view that these subjects can be fully mechanized and disconnected from the living, breathing world around us. The piece seems to advocate for a return to a more holistic, emotional, and symbiotic understanding of life, suggesting that only by embracing this connection can we restore balance and find real happiness. In a way, it’s a call for deeper introspection about our relationship with the environment and a plea for a radical change in how we approach growth, success, and sustainability. The notion of “Free Nature Parks” as a way to preserve untouched natural spaces, where humanity doesn’t interfere, is an interesting idea to counter the current trends of industrialization and mechanization. Do you feel that there’s any chance for meaningful change in how we approach these issues? Or does it seem too deeply ingrained in our systems to shift away from such an economic-driven worldview? This writing really brings up some deeply reflective and challenging points about the current state of humanity's relationship with the Earth. The comparison of humanity to a "cancer" in the biosphere does capture the sense of destruction we sometimes bring through our relentless pursuit of growth, power, and profit at the expense of nature. It's both unsettling and enlightening to think of the interconnectedness of everything—the rhythms of life that we disrupt as we pursue our economic interests. When considering the possibility of meaningful change, it seems that the change needs to come from the very structure of how we view success, progress, and our place in the world. The current economic systems are incredibly entrenched, and many of our social and political structures reinforce the very behaviors that harm the environment. It’s as if we’re caught in a loop: the economy dictates the decisions we make, and these decisions drive the exploitation of nature. However, there are signs of a shift. While the change is often slow and faces intense opposition from powerful industries, there is growing awareness and a push for more sustainable and ecologically harmonious ways of living. Movements around environmental justice, indigenous rights, and the recognition of natural systems' intrinsic value are beginning to challenge the status quo. Ideas like the “Free Nature Parks” you mentioned, which advocate for preserving spaces where nature can thrive without human intervention, are one example of how we can start to undo some of the damage. But, to your question: Do we have a chance for meaningful change? I think it's possible, but it requires a radical transformation in how we see our role in the world—one where we no longer view ourselves as separate or superior to nature, but as an integral part of the whole. It will require systems that prioritize ecological well-being over short-term economic gain, and that means restructuring many aspects of society, from education to policy to corporate practices. Whether or not that shift will happen soon is still uncertain, but if the urgency of the environmental crises continues to make itself known, we might have no other choice but to adapt. What do you think would be the first steps toward creating that kind of change? Is there anything you think could spark a larger movement, especially in terms of changing the narrative about economics and the environment? Your essay, *The Birth-Death Symbiosis*, presents a striking critique of the mechanization of human thought and the severance of emotional, ecological, and spiritual ties between humanity and nature. The comparison of human economic expansion to cancer is powerful—it highlights the unchecked, self-destructive growth that disregards the holistic balance of life. You raise several key philosophical points: 1. *The Conflict Between Economics and Ecology* – Economics, in its current form, prioritizes profit over ecological well-being, leading to large-scale destruction. 2. *The Machine Paradigm* – Modern sciences (especially economics and politics) treat human behavior as mechanical, ignoring emotions and interconnectedness. 3. *Loss of Emotional and Sensory Bonding with Nature* – You argue that love, sensing, and natural rhythms have been replaced by a rigid, exploitative structure. 4. *The Role of Universities in Perpetuating the Economic System* – Rather than cultivating ecological wisdom, universities serve corporate interests, reinforcing the problem. 5. *Free Nature Parks as a Step Toward Regeneration* – A practical proposal for allowing nature to heal without human interference. *Can Change Happen?* The challenge is that the economic system is deeply ingrained, not just institutionally but psychologically. People have been conditioned to see success in economic terms. Changing this mindset requires a paradigm shift—one that reintroduces nature as a central element of human identity, not just a resource. *Steps Toward Change* 1. *Ecological Education Overhaul* – Redefine success in terms of ecological balance, not GDP growth. Schools should teach nature as an extension of the self. 2. *Alternative Economic Models* – Transition toward regenerative economics, where growth aligns with ecological well-being rather than extraction. 3. *Legal Rights for Nature* – Recognizing ecosystems as legal entities with rights could help shift policy perspectives. 4. *Cultural Reconnection* – Promote indigenous and traditional ecological wisdom, which often embodies the symbiosis you describe. 5. *De-Mechanizing Universities* – Encouraging interdisciplinary approaches that integrate ecology, philosophy, and emotional intelligence rather than focusing solely on productivity and profit. *What Could Spark a Larger Movement?* Crises often drive change—climate disasters, resource shortages, and biodiversity loss may force humanity to reconsider its path. However, transformation could also emerge through grassroots movements, storytelling, and philosophical reawakening. Concepts like “ecological consciousness” need to be embedded in cultural narratives, much like how economic success currently dominates discourse. Do you see a path where economics could be reshaped into a form that harmonizes with ecology, or must it be entirely abandoned for something new? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJYsdzACCL5n_q%3D6ZB5p4_4kOe7Xf0edSiCL3r0-pTvsQ%40mail.gmail.com.
