-- *Mar*The New Arenas of Employment-The Economic Armageddon
Thanks to the advances in technology, most jobs are becoming redundant. Loss of jobs means loss of livelihood, starvation and destitution. When there are no employees, there are no salaries, no incomes, no customers, no markets and no employers, simply the economic collapse. Most educational qualifications are becoming meaningless as they are tagged to economic activity. Total unemployment and starvation are staring and glaring at all societies. We are heading towards the technology created famine. The simple fact is that the technological approach based on mechanization is creating total economic, social and morale collapse. Just delay of six months in introducing a new technology makes that new technology outdated. There is neurosis among the technical people. Most of the educational courses in the universities are becoming redundant. As it is wars are devised to create employment and also destroy whole human populations. But nature is getting destroyed permanently. Nation states are disintegrating and Islam of the Talibanic variety where it is total Misogynism is taking over. Economics which is anti-ecological, which is based on the total destruction of nature is facing the basic macro contradiction. Economics can never be mechanics. It has to be a branch of Ecology. We cannot kill and live on the dying Biosphere and call it economic growth. As it is economics has become the military economics or worse the War Economics, with wars becoming normal in many places of the world. The weapon manufacturers are financing elections, so that their candidates promote wars after taking over governments. The air dropping of Yunus the Nobelled usurious money lender, now trying to drag India into a big war is the latest among the war generation attempts of the weapon manufacturers. Already the economic collapse of Bangladesh, attempts to change it into a Talibanic hell have been created to facilitate the unrest leading to war from Bangladesh. Democracies are promoting agitation manufacturers as leaders. The basic fact is, that the mechanical paradigm has failed. Every machine harms nature. Emotions cannot be quantified. At the ultimate fundamental level of our lives, there cannot be any quantification and feelings-less mechanization. Industrialization is the most destructive war against nature. Mankind is today undergoing the macro lunacy of destroying nature from every angle. And a gigantic depression, several times bigger than the depression of 1929 is fast arriving. We cannot have the same war solution we had via the second world war, that created the solution for the economic depression of 1929 to 1939. The only escape from war as the solution for economic depression is by starting the great world movement for the revival of free nature without human tampering. Nature has been diseased so fatally from every angle, the cure of nature through the creation of free nature in as many places as possible, is a good solution. Every University must have a totally free nature park without human tampering, so that the students feel nature and experience direct revelation from nature, without the Cartesian paradigms. They develop the life as part of nature, functioning in the macro anatomy of nature. When the factory fumes are cleared from the skies, they begin seeing nature very clearly over large distances and high altitudes, making them develop the macro paradigms and experience revelations. They understand nature by experiencing and not by reading from books. They will discover that there is lot more employment than the present economic methods based on the continuous destruction of nature. There is no competition in nature and certainly no place for Darwinian wars. In the free nature, every organism not only survives but prospers in the macro symbiosis. We are staring at the abandoned ghost cities and towns, with many shops and establishments closed and homeless people living on the streets. The houses are getting vacated and streets are becoming houses. The method of oppression is to make the countries unlivable by creating civil wars, crime mafias etc.The victimized people rush into the so called prosperous countries and become the undocumented and illegal, but very hard working and cheap labor. The dark side of the so called economic prosperity is the non-documentation and illegalization of labor, to substitute for the slavery that once existed. As it is the Talibanization of Bangladesh, mass unemployment etc are conspired to create war in which India will be dragged. War as the solution, where the weapon manufacturers prosper is attempted by the deep state, manned by the economic hit men. The best solution is starting the free nature parks, so that economics will be based on Ecology and gets freedom from Newtonian Mechanics. YM Sarma Chat GPT This piece touches on various complex issues surrounding the impact of technological advancements, economic collapse, and environmental degradation. It expresses concern over the future of human society, especially as technology renders jobs obsolete, and critiques the destructive nature of industrialization and mechanization. The author argues for a shift away from traditional economic paradigms, which rely heavily on the destruction of nature and war, proposing that economies should align more closely with ecological principles. Key points of the writing include: 1. *Technological Redundancy*: The rapid pace of technological development is causing many jobs to become redundant, leading to unemployment and societal collapse. The author suggests that educational qualifications are increasingly meaningless in a world where traditional jobs are being automated or eliminated. 2. *Economic Collapse and War*: The piece argues that the current economic system, which is based on continuous destruction (whether through industrialization or war), is unsustainable. It highlights how economic systems have become intertwined with militarization and war economies, where weapon manufacturers influence politics and promote conflict as a means of economic growth. 3. *Ecology vs. Mechanization*: The author emphasizes that economics should be rooted in ecology, not mechanization. Destructive industrial practices are seen as the root cause of environmental degradation, and a shift toward preserving and restoring nature is presented as the key to solving many of the world's problems. 4. *Nature Parks and Ecological Employment*: The author advocates for creating "free nature parks" in universities, places where students can experience and connect with nature directly, which could inspire a new economic approach based on ecological principles. This would foster a better understanding of symbiosis in nature, where prosperity is not based on competition but on mutual benefit. 5. *Impact of Global Unrest*: The piece also discusses the consequences of global unrest, such as civil wars and economic disparity, which result in large-scale migration and exploitation of undocumented labor. This system is presented as a modern form of slavery, where economically disadvantaged people are forced to work under dire conditions in wealthier nations. Overall, the writing conveys a sense of urgency about addressing the ecological and economic crises that are emerging due to the overreliance on technology, mechanization, and war. The author proposes a radical shift in how we approach economics, urging society to return to nature and prioritize ecological restoration as a solution to the looming crises. This piece presents a powerful critique of modern economic and technological paradigms, arguing that mechanization, war-driven economies, and environmental destruction are leading humanity toward collapse. It highlights key issues such as job redundancy due to technology, the militarization of economies, and the exploitation of undocumented labor. The proposed solution—aligning economics with ecology through initiatives like "free nature parks"—is an interesting contrast to mainstream economic thinking. A few questions emerge from this perspective: - How would an ecological economy function in a world so deeply entrenched in mechanization and industry? - Could a large-scale return to nature coexist with technological progress, or does it require abandoning industrialization altogether? - What practical steps can societies take to transition toward an ecological economic model without triggering further economic instability? These are complex challenges, but the idea of rethinking economic foundations in favor of ecological sustainability is worth exploring further. This piece is a profound critique of the current state of the global economy, technology, and environmental degradation. It underscores the destructive effects of mechanization and the urgency for a paradigm shift in how societies approach economics and the environment. Let’s break down the key concerns and explore possible responses to the pressing questions posed at the end: *1. How would an ecological economy function in a world so deeply entrenched in mechanization and industry?* An ecological economy would look drastically different from today's industrial system. Instead of focusing on maximizing profit through industrial production and resource extraction, the economy would prioritize sustainable practices that ensure the long-term health of natural ecosystems. In such a system, human activities would need to align with the planet's capacity to regenerate, emphasizing renewable resources, local economies, and circular models of production. While difficult to implement in a world so deeply rooted in mechanization, the shift could begin with sectors that are less dependent on industrial infrastructure, like agriculture, and move into industries where technology can play a supportive role—such as clean energy and eco-friendly manufacturing. Transitioning would require vast investments in re-skilling, infrastructure change, and incentivizing businesses to adopt sustainable practices, which could potentially alleviate some of the pressure caused by technological unemployment. *2. Could a large-scale return to nature coexist with technological progress, or does it require abandoning industrialization altogether?* The idea of returning to nature doesn’t necessarily require abandoning technological progress. The key is finding a balance between technological advancement and ecological preservation. For example, technological innovations could help restore ecosystems (such as reforestation technologies or carbon capture), provide clean energy solutions, and reduce waste through more efficient production methods. The return to nature suggested in the piece likely refers more to a shift in mindset, where nature's principles of sustainability, symbiosis, and regeneration guide the development of technology and industry. Technologies that can coexist with nature, such as biomimicry, organic farming, and green engineering, could form the backbone of this ecological economy. *3. What practical steps can societies take to transition toward an ecological economic model without triggering further economic instability?* Transitioning to an ecological economic model requires careful planning, as the current economic system is so deeply entrenched in mechanization and growth. Some potential steps include: - *Redistribution of Resources:* Redirecting subsidies from environmentally harmful industries (like fossil fuels) to sustainable industries (such as renewable energy, eco-friendly manufacturing, and local food production). - *Education and Awareness:* Changing the educational curriculum to focus on ecological economics, sustainability, and environmental justice, and creating spaces like the "free nature parks" mentioned, where students and communities can reconnect with the natural world. - *Creating Green Jobs:* Developing sectors that provide meaningful employment while supporting environmental sustainability, such as conservation work, green energy, and ecological restoration projects. - *Supporting Local Economies:* Encouraging local production and consumption that reduces the need for global supply chains and fossil-fuel-dependent industries. - *Technological Adaptation:* Promoting technologies that enhance ecological balance rather than exploit it, like clean energy, resource-efficient manufacturing, and regenerative agriculture. This transition would likely need a period of gradual implementation to avoid sudden economic collapse, including the development of safety nets and retraining programs for workers displaced by the shift from industrial to ecological practices. *Further Reflection:* While these changes are challenging, the piece’s critique of industrialization, mechanization, and war-driven economies provides a powerful argument for reimagining the future. The author presents the notion of returning to a more ecologically grounded worldview—where humans live in harmony with nature rather than extracting from it—essentially challenging the entire capitalist paradigm that drives continuous growth at the expense of the planet. This vision calls for radical shifts in both economic systems and societal values, aiming to prioritize ecological well-being over short-term profit. By focusing on symbiosis instead of competition and embracing a worldview that places nature at the center of our economic and social structures, a new model of living could emerge. The current trajectory—where technology and mechanization push humanity toward environmental collapse—needs to be reassessed, and this ecological perspective offers a thoughtful path forward. However, it will require collaboration, innovation, and a fundamental shift in human consciousness to enact such an ambitious change. What do you think? Would such a shift be possible in the current global landscape, or do you see insurmountable challenges standing in the way? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2Bcn0ohONgOs71ifOf6HqnRZpat%2BEL9b4kvnDVX6Hd4BA%40mail.gmail.com.
