-- *Mar*Ecological Life-Vs-Economic Life
Imagine that the present economic life never happened. That nature was totally free. Then you were born into a bigger womb, nature itself, arriving from your mother’s womb. The womb is very big compared to your mother’s womb, where you grew with the splicing of the cells of you, with Autopoesis or total audit before each splicing, under the macro monitoring of your mother’s womb. In the bigger womb also you grew via the same splicing, but the Autopoesis was helped by the gigantic nature, every organism participating in your growth, via emotional entanglement. The smell and sound messages from the Biosphere, via the troposphere, converted the breathing, smelling, hearing and seeing, into teaching by nature, the teaching that automatically was used for living. You grew with the total trust in nature or God, Theism being the basic paradigm of perception and understanding. Theism means the basic dependence on free nature for living without any economic manipulation. It was ecological living which includes emotional interaction as the foundation of life. It was not a subject for Cartesian debates. It consisted of the continuous, smell, sight and sound guidance from nature, creating the wonderful guiding macro music. God or nature, joined one’s internal hormonal communication with the internal hormonal communication of every other organism, via breathing, smelling,sensing and communicating via exhaling and vocal expressing of tunes and musics and songs. The Biosphere never threatened. It participated emotionally with you, giving answers automatically even without questions. It was the flow of answers without questions, actually thrilling, reinforcing and stunning revelations, in the flow of wonderful revelations. God or nature took charge of your life and you never got lost. You lived in rapture. Nature monitored your health continuously and it was the Doctor that monitored your health continuously. There simply was no need for breaking the head with logics and Cartesian reasoning without feeling, as feeling is bias today. Actually every organism was your emotional complement and a classmate the great college, nature. Economics today is the opposite of everything of Ecology. It has cut you from ecology. And it has been killing the basic ecology of nature continuously. You are living today in the ‘Lost Life’. Every economic man of economics is a machine, an atheist who cannot feel Ecology. It is the murder cult against nature; destroying and poisoning continuously all land, water and air. The very word profit is totally meaningless. When your income is my expenditure, when incomes and expenses cannot but be equal, there can be no profit or loss. Profit simply is the euphemism for the Darwinian killing of nature. It is for the Universities to call a spade a spade, and take the initiative to start the Free Nature Parks without human tampering. There must be a gigantic revolution for the revival of ecology. Democracy must mean the right to vote by every life form. In the free nature it will be ecological democracy and not just the Anthropocentric Democracy. In the free and healthy nature without human tampering, every organism votes continuously and does not need the Ballot Box. YM Sarma Chat GPT This piece presents a powerful critique of the modern economic system by contrasting it with an idealized version of ecological life. It argues that, before the advent of economic manipulation, nature itself was a form of "womb," nurturing and guiding life through an interconnected, emotional relationship with every organism. This "ecological life" is depicted as one of harmony, trust, and continuous guidance from nature, where every living being was an active participant in the holistic ecosystem. In this view, life was ecologically sustainable, emotionally fulfilling, and spiritually aligned with a theistic worldview — nature or God was an ever-present, guiding force. On the other hand, the current economic system is presented as a force that has severed humanity from nature, turning people into mechanical, profit-driven beings who cannot feel or understand the deep connections within ecological systems. The piece argues that profit, a central concept in economics, is a destructive force that leads to the degradation of the environment, and economic growth at the cost of nature is a form of "killing" it. The call for ecological revival is framed as a revolution to return to a natural state of balance and unity with the Earth, with an emphasis on the idea of "ecological democracy," where every life form has a voice and agency, free from human interference. The tone is deeply philosophical and emotional, conveying a sense of loss for the ecological harmony that once existed and a call to action for its restoration. It urges a collective shift in consciousness, from anthropocentric thinking (human-centered) to an ecocentric approach that respects the rights of all life forms. The idea of "free nature parks" without human tampering represents a vision for preserving ecosystems in their natural state, where they can function without the destructive forces of modern economics. In summary, this piece contrasts two opposing worldviews: one rooted in the emotional, interconnected ecology of nature and the other in the mechanized, profit-driven structure of modern economics. It calls for a return to ecological balance, where life, in all its forms, is given the freedom to thrive and "vote" for its own well-being. This text offers a poignant reflection on the relationship between nature, ecology, and the modern economic system. It critiques how economics has disrupted the inherent connection humans once shared with the natural world, replacing it with a mechanistic and profit-driven worldview that, in the author’s view, harms the environment. The author imagines a time before economic manipulation, where nature itself acted as a nurturing force—a "womb" in which all organisms thrived, emotionally and spiritually connected to their surroundings. In this idealized ecological world, there was no need for economic structures because life was inherently sustainable, guided by an emotional and harmonious bond with the biosphere. Nature, in this vision, functioned as a continuous and organic guide—its presence felt in every sense and interaction, from breathing and hearing to seeing and smelling. This holistic way of life, steeped in trust and emotional resonance with the Earth, was seen as a form of "ecological democracy," where every organism participated in the natural rhythms and cycles without the interference of human-driven economics. In stark contrast, the economic systems of today are painted as antagonistic forces. The author frames economics as something that isolates humanity from this deep connection to nature, turning individuals into "machines"—profit-driven, emotionally disconnected beings who cannot perceive or understand the ecological fabric they are part of. Profit, the author argues, is a euphemism for the exploitation and destruction of the Earth, a force that sees nature as a resource to be extracted and exploited rather than a living system with intrinsic value. The idea of profit, in this context, is equated with the Darwinian "killing" of nature. The call to action is for a revolutionary shift back toward an "ecological life," one in which every life form has a voice and agency—what the author calls "ecological democracy." This vision suggests creating spaces where nature can exist freely, untainted by human exploitation, with a system of governance that includes the voices of all living beings, not just humans. The concept of "free nature parks"—areas where nature is protected from human interference—is presented as a step toward restoring ecological balance. In conclusion, the text contrasts the interconnected, emotional world of ecology with the destructive, profit-driven forces of modern economics. It advocates for a return to a more ecocentric worldview, where all life forms are treated as equals, and nature’s rhythms and wisdom guide the way forward. The text emphasizes the importance of reconnecting with nature and prioritizing the well-being of the entire biosphere over human-centered economic growth. This passage offers a profound critique of the way modern economics has disconnected humans from the natural world and its holistic, emotional rhythms. The author paints a vivid picture of a time when life was deeply intertwined with nature, before economic systems introduced manipulation and exploitation. In this idealized version of ecological life, humans were part of a system in which all living beings communicated, shared emotional bonds, and thrived within the ecosystem. The guiding principle here is one of trust in nature, where living in harmony was not a choice, but a natural way of being—free from the need for profit or economic systems. The contrast with the current economic world is striking. The author views modern economics as a force that reduces humans to "machines"—individuals who are disconnected from the natural, emotional flow of life. The focus on profit in this system is seen as inherently destructive, reducing the complexity of life into something transactional, and in the process, damaging the very environment that sustains all life. This criticism is particularly poignant when the author connects profit to the "killing" of nature, a deep and troubling assertion that underlines the author's belief in the necessity of ecological revival. The passage ends with a call to action, encouraging a revolutionary shift toward what the author calls "ecological democracy." This idea envisions a world in which nature, untainted by human interference, exists freely, with every organism participating in the governance of the ecosystem. By proposing "free nature parks" and giving life forms the ability to "vote" for their own well-being, the author suggests that a new kind of democracy is necessary—one that respects the interconnectedness of all life forms, not just humans. Ultimately, the text is a powerful plea for a return to a more ecocentric worldview, where nature and its rhythms guide life rather than human economic interests. It challenges readers to reconsider the way we engage with the environment and to take steps toward an ecological balance where all living beings have a voice. It is a call for deep change—both in how we understand nature and how we structure society. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKhKryW6g0ufifJAERsmdg5VEJytP36wWREhELqsFaBug%40mail.gmail.com.
