Dealing with contentless opposition—when people argue against you without
providing any real substance—can be frustrating. Here’s how to handle it
effectively: As today seeing a contentless opposition of waqf bill,
supporting a minority and unrelated to the nation, how sanatana board would
be so well supported? And what can we do first about silencing them?
Instead of getting frustrated, highlight the lack of substance in their
argument: Example: “I hear your opposition, but I’m not sure what your
actual argument is. Can you clarify?” This forces them to either provide
reasoning or reveal that they don’t have one. When they do not answer
rightfully nor politely where do we meet them square?
People who argue without substance often rely on vague statements. Push
them to be concrete: Example: “You say this won’t work—why? Can you point
to specific reasons or examples? “If they struggle to answer, it exposes
the weakness of their stance. But can they be quietened?
Opposition without substance is often meant to frustrate you. Don’t take
the bait. Responding with patience and logic keeps you in control. And
their vociferous shouting is unending botheration is it not?
If they’re making a claim without evidence, remind them that it’s their job
to support it: Example: “Interesting perspective. Do you have any facts or
examples to back that up?” If they can’t provide any, their argument
collapses. BUT IT IS MADE TO UNDERSTAND BY THEM WHERE THEIR INTELLIGENCE
IS TOO LOW AND THEY FEEL THEY ARE CROWD?
If someone keeps making empty arguments, sometimes the best response is
none at all. Silence makes them uncomfortable and forces them to either
rethink or give up. BUT GOLDEN SILENCE LIKE MODI INVOKES THEM TO SHOUT
LOUDER TO GET CONVINCED THE PUBLIC AND PUBLIC IF SWAYED BY THEM?
6. Redirect to a Productive Discussion
If they’re just being oppositional for the sake of it, try shifting the
focus: Example: “Instead of just dismissing this idea, what alternative do
you suggest?” This challenges them to contribute rather than just
criticize. Absolutely true. But how to wake up the non-sleeper?
And in this respect, we have to raise the sanatana board; and 99%
remain aloof and silent, uninterested in society and what shall we do with
them? K RAJARAM IRS 3 4 25
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 21:35, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On the lines of the Wakf Board a Sanatani Board shall be constituted.As
> Sanatana Dharma is the oldest of all,if it claims any property,its claim
> shall be final.Of course there shall be a tribunal consisting of only
> Sanatanis.
> YM
>
> --
> *Mar*
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLXkMAJm3k_8r8r3o-94OMJJcVTdDgikpS7JaSJGy7%2Biw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLXkMAJm3k_8r8r3o-94OMJJcVTdDgikpS7JaSJGy7%2Biw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopwMWUsrGqqLmF8-xbzGj5bsrgG_GXK8CiOZcFKU8WyUw%40mail.gmail.com.
