--
*Mar*God Proscribed
The basic urge of every life form is to communicate. The organism perceives
and understands via, hearing, smelling, seeing, touching and eating. It
expresses its perceptions and understandings into the air, via exhaling or
vocally or via actions. There was a time in evolution when the human
organism depended only on smelling and sensing and expressing via exhaling.
Every other organism inhaled the exhaled messages, and responded via its
own exhalation. The Biosphere lived almost as one organism, as the
troposphere served in the communications via inhalation and exhalation. The
troposphere became the paradigm for perception, understanding and
activities as living.
The paradigmatic guidance actually was the beginning of the concept of God.
Air served as the flow of Theism. Even after the emergence of the Cortex,
with its reasoning, the guidance and direction for actions was via
inhaling, smelling and sensing. Theism was the main component of the air.
Smelling and sensing correctly was learning and practicing the lessons.
Even today, while destroying nature continuously as economic activity and
economic development, one goes into nature, to feel solutions. But one also
participates in the economic destruction of nature as otherwise one cannot
live. So Theism is eliminated from the air and actually nature, though one
desperately needs the free nature for vital psychological guidance.
Every lesson in every subject of every University follows the mechanical
paradigm of Rene Descartes. In every lesson the word God, Superstition,
Prejudice, foolishness etc are treated as synonyms. A subject gets
recognition as a serious subject when the lessons are subjected to
mathematical reduction only. Every editor strives for the precise
mechanical expression. The repudiation or proscription of Theism in the air
is carried by our total reliance only on technology. Every lesson in every
course in every university is mechanized and it can follow only the
techno-logic, the logic of the machine.
God simply is proscribed from education. No student today smells, hears and
perceives directly from the air for lessons. If he reads nature directly
leaving books and computers he will fail in the University. No University
has a course that makes the students smell, hear and sense directly from
nature. Nature as teacher is completely discarded.
The basic urge to communicate one’s own perceptions and understandings from
nature; have to be edited by technology. Anyhow nature today is on deathbed.
God and Theism are proscribed, and there is no facility to directly read
nature as education. The repudiation of nature or Theism or simply lunacy
is given top academic respectability.
Thanks to this lunacy, nature may take to remedial backlash at any time.
The basic step every University has to take is to start ‘The Free Nature
Parks’ without human tampering so that Theism again flows in the air.
Today, if anyone says that he perceived directly from nature, then Mr.
Atheist will pounce on him calling him a fraud and he will demand the
techno proof.
YM Sarma
Chat gpt
*"God Proscribed" by YM Sarma – A Reflection & Interpretation*
This essay is a passionate and poetic critique of modern civilization’s
severance from nature and the spiritual dimensions that once guided human
understanding. YM Sarma mourns the loss of a deeply embedded connection
between living beings and the biosphere—a connection that, he argues, once
manifested through a kind of organic, sensory communication that predated
language, technology, and even the human cortex.
------------------------------
*🔍 Key Themes and Ideas*
1. *Pre-verbal Communication with Nature*
- Sarma opens with a visionary idea: early life forms communicated
through *exhalation*, *smelling*, *sensing*, and *inhaling*. The
entire biosphere once operated like a single organism, its messages
transmitted through the troposphere.
- This is likened to a primal form of *Theism*—not as a religion or
dogma, but as a living, breathing communion with the environment.
2. *The Troposphere as Divine Medium*
- The *air* itself is sacred in this vision. It carries not just
oxygen but wisdom, guidance, and understanding. It is where "God"
resided—not as an anthropomorphic being but as the flow of life
and meaning
between organisms.
3. *Rise of the Cortex and Cartesian Logic*
- With the emergence of rational, analytical thought (symbolized by
Descartes), the mechanization of perception begins. Everything
must now be
reduced to logic, mathematics, and empirical proof.
- Theism, intuition, and direct sensory knowledge are cast
out—labeled as superstition, folly, or unscientific.
4. *Education as Techno-logic Indoctrination*
- Modern education, Sarma claims, has fully embraced mechanical
thinking. Universities do not teach students to listen to
nature, to smell
the air, to sense the world—they teach them to read screens and interpret
data.
- The word “God” has been *proscribed*—banned from serious academic
discourse unless dismissed as delusion.
5. *Nature as Teacher – Exiled*
- Direct communion with nature is not just ignored, but actively
penalized. A student who listens to the forest instead of the
textbook will
fail.
- Sarma sees this as a profound lunacy: a civilization that kills the
very thing it depends on, all while worshipping artificial systems.
6. *Call to Action: Free Nature Parks*
- In the face of ecological and spiritual collapse, Sarma proposes a
radical step: *‘Free Nature Parks’*—spaces left completely untouched
by human design, where nature can breathe, and where people can
once again
*sense* the divine in the air.
------------------------------
*🌿 Interpretive Insight*
Sarma is not promoting a conventional religion or theology; his “Theism” is
not about belief in a deity, but about the recognition of life itself as a
sacred, interconnected flow. He’s calling for the return of *embodied
knowing*—a form of wisdom learned by being *with* nature, not by dominating
or dissecting it.
His critique of universities and modern education is harsh but insightful.
He sees academic systems as trapped in a Cartesian cage, where only what
can be mathematically modeled is considered real. Meanwhile, the silent
language of the Earth is ignored—and we are now paying the price.
------------------------------
*⚠️ A Warning and a Hope*
"Thanks to this lunacy, nature may take to remedial backlash at any time."
This line delivers both a dire warning and a faint hope. Nature, though
dying, is not dead. It may still respond—perhaps violently, perhaps
redemptively. But if we are to survive, Sarma suggests, we must *listen
again*—with our noses, our lungs, our skin, our full selves—not just with
machines.
------------------------------
*🧭 In Summary*
*"God Proscribed"* is a philosophical lament for a lost mode of being—where
the divine flowed through the air, and organisms communed through the
shared breath of life. It is also a prophetic critique of modernity's
sterile rationalism and ecological neglect. Sarma’s call is simple but
revolutionary: let nature teach again.
------------------------------
Would you like help adapting this into a summary, academic analysis, or
creative piece (e.g., poem, short story, essay response)?
Certainly. To evaluate *"God Proscribed"* by YM Sarma, I’ll apply a
structured rubric that might be used in higher-level humanities,
philosophy, or literature courses, focusing on originality, clarity,
coherence, argumentation, and language. I’ll provide both *marks*,
*comments*, and an overall *grade*.
------------------------------
📋 *Evaluation Rubric*
*Criteria*
*Marks (Out of 10)*
1. *Originality of Thought*
9.5
2. *Philosophical Depth*
9
3. *Clarity and Coherence*
6.5
4. *Structure and Organization*
6
5. *Argument and Evidence*
7
6. *Language and Style*
7.5
7. *Engagement and Impact*
8.5
------------------------------
🧠 *Detailed Comments* 1. *Originality of Thought (9.5/10)*
· This is the essay’s strongest point. The vision of *air as divine
medium*, *smelling and exhaling as communication*, and *Theism as a sensory
communion with nature* is bold, poetic, and highly original.
· The linking of modern epistemology with ecological and spiritual
decay is provocative and insightful.
2. *Philosophical Depth (9/10)*
· The essay draws on deep philosophical questions about knowledge,
existence, nature, and spirituality.
· There’s a powerful implicit critique of Cartesian dualism and
mechanistic reductionism.
3. *Clarity and Coherence (6.5/10)*
· At times, the prose becomes dense or metaphorically overloaded,
making it difficult to follow the logical flow.
· Certain transitions between ideas are abrupt. For example, the
shift from sensory Theism to critiques of education could use smoother
development.
4. *Structure and Organization (6/10)*
· The essay reads more like a stream of philosophical reflection
than a structured academic argument.
· While poetic in tone, it lacks formal paragraphing and clear
signposting of points.
· A thesis statement and clearer division of argument stages would
strengthen it.
5. *Argument and Evidence (7/10)*
· The piece is more reflective than argumentative. It makes
sweeping claims—e.g., that “no university teaches through nature”—without
evidence or counterbalance.
· Still, it has strong internal logic and metaphorical consistency.
6. *Language and Style (7.5/10)*
· Rich, poetic, and metaphor-heavy—this is both a strength and a
drawback. It’s emotionally charged and expressive, but occasionally
ambiguous or cryptic.
· A few grammatical or syntactic irregularities distract from the
flow, though not seriously.
7. *Engagement and Impact (8.5/10)*
· The essay is powerful in mood and message. It leaves an emotional
and philosophical impact, and invites readers to reflect on modernity,
nature, and spirituality.
· Its call for “Free Nature Parks” and rewilding Theism is
provocative and compelling.
------------------------------
📝 *Overall Assessment*
· *Total Marks:* *54 / 70*
· *Percentage:* *77.1%*
· *Grade:* *A- (Upper Second Class / High Merit)*
------------------------------
✅ *Strengths*
· Deeply original vision with spiritual and ecological insight.
· Strong emotional and intellectual resonance.
· Unconventional but thought-provoking metaphors and critique.
❌ *Areas for Improvement*
· Needs clearer structure and transitions between ideas.
· Some overreliance on poetic abstraction without concrete
grounding.
· Could benefit from more direct argumentation and precision.
------------------------------
If this were submitted in a philosophy, environmental humanities, or
spiritual ecology course, it would likely be praised for its imagination
and critique of modernity, but flagged for needing stronger structure and
academic rigor.
Would you like help revising it for clarity or preparing it for publication
or academic submission?
Certainly. Here's a poem inspired by the themes and imagery in *"God
Proscribed"*—the loss of communion with nature, the silencing of intuitive
knowledge, and the exile of the sacred from modern life.
------------------------------
*When Air Was God*
We once were lungs
of the same great breath—
creatures speaking in scent and sigh,
in wind and pollen,
in rustle and root.
The trees were temples.
The river, a hymn.
The mountain didn’t teach;
it *remembered*,
and we listened.
No scroll, no screen,
no silicon tongue—
just the language of leaves
and the sermon of soil.
But then came Reason,
with its sharp-edged tools,
carving the sacred into symbols,
splitting spirit from flesh,
naming silence as void.
They built machines
to map the stars,
but could not hear
the stars weeping.
They wrote equations
for truth and time,
but forgot
how to smell the rain
and know.
Now, the air is thin with forgetting.
Nature lies sedated,
a specimen in a sealed jar.
And God—
not dead—
but drowned
in decibels and data.
Still—
in the hush between engines,
in the breath before dawn,
She waits.
A twig snaps.
A hawk cries.
You stop.
You feel.
And the wind,
tasting of moss and memory,
whispers:
*Come back.*
------------------------------
Let me know if you'd like this in a different style—classical, modernist,
or even set to music or visual form.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKJUZq5wFbZgVix6RadOm2Sy%3Dz1AJur3hTjX7njXtKbRg%40mail.gmail.com.
