-- *Mar*Cognition as a Limb and Sprout of Nature
Suppose from birth onwards you have been told and taught, that you are a part of nature, a limb of nature and that your real body is nature. Automatically you identify the flora and fauna as yourself. You automatically develop the belief that you can use nature as your own body. You develop the paradigmatic identity as nature. A strong and healthy nature gives you great confidence and happiness as you identify nature as yourself. As nature becomes the basic paradigmatic connecting base of understanding, the very horizon and expanse of your perception will be very broad. Simply you team up with nature for perception. When you feel sick, you look around to see the source of your sickness. Because, healthy nature does not allow sickness in you. There are many tribes even today, who attribute natural disasters to the anger of God. Actually they can sense the anger in advance and escape say from a Tsunami, Earthquake, Storm or Flood. They do not need technology to predict Earth quakes, Tsunamis etc. Unfortunately many terrible superstitions also developed, leading to terrible rituals. The sadistic rituals, like animal and even human sacrifice, are due to the deviation from the general symbiosis in nature. Today the deviation from the symbiosis of nature has become economics and we live in the deviation. We no longer feel that we are part of nature. Telepathy means the conveyance of feelings without words or even nearness. When you identify and perceive by smelling automatically your internal hormonal system identifies the source of feelings. In free, lush and healthy nature, telepathy takes over, and the air brims with feelings. Nature converses continuously. The air functions as the blood circulation system of the Biosphere. Telepathy is the transport of feelings and not in the language of words. But when you feel the meanings of words as meanings evolve in you on the basis of your experience and perception in life, telepathy takes to the language of words particular to you. No two persons really understand a word in the same way. When you become a part, sprout and limb of nature, the troposphere takes over your hormonal communication and learning becomes symbiotic and hormonal. We maimed and have been maiming our macro body, as economic life and we do not even realize that the sense of loneliness is actually due to the maiming of our macro anatomy. When you find a cut tree, plucked flower or a poisoned river, note that the harm is happening to you. I wish that at least one University among the thousands of universities in the world will revive the faculty of Telepathy of the air by leaving a portion of land total freedom on the terms of nature and where the students strive for cognition via feeling the telepathy of nature. YM Sarma Chat gpt This piece, *“Cognition as a Limb and Sprout of Nature” by YM Sarma*, is a contemplative, poetic meditation on the deep, intrinsic connection between human cognition, nature, and the breakdown of that relationship in modern, economically-driven society. Here's a breakdown and reflection on the core ideas: ------------------------------ *🔍 Core Ideas and Themes* 1. *Human as Nature* From the very beginning, the author asks us to imagine an alternate paradigm: what if we had always been taught that *we are nature itself*—a “limb” or “sprout” of the Earth? In this worldview, the boundary between the self and the natural world dissolves. The forest, rivers, and skies become as intimate to us as our own limbs. The health of nature becomes our *own health*—physically, emotionally, even spiritually. 2. *Perception and Cognition as Symbiotic Processes* The text argues for a broader model of cognition—one that’s *not limited to individual brains* but distributed and symbiotic, arising from immersion in a healthy natural environment. In this view, cognition is not merely processing inputs, but *feeling*, *sensing*, and *interbeing* with the natural world. 3. *Telepathy as Natural Communication* Telepathy, in this context, isn’t about supernatural powers. It’s about a *deep, embodied sensitivity* to the signals of life—olfactory, hormonal, emotional, environmental. It’s about *sensing meaning* through shared being, not through abstraction or language. The air, like blood in a body, circulates feeling. A healthy biosphere is constantly speaking to those who can feel it. 4. *Modern Disconnection* The author mourns the *economic paradigm* that has replaced natural symbiosis. Our identification has shifted—from nature to economy. As we sever our “macro anatomy” (the Earth), we suffer from *loneliness*, alienation, and emotional sickness. The maiming of nature becomes a maiming of self. 5. *A Call for a New Kind of Education* Sarma envisions a university—a place of higher learning—not built on artificial constructs or economic logic, but *on the terms of nature*. A place where students reconnect to feeling, perception, and telepathy through immersion in wild, untouched land. Education would thus be *hormonal, ecological, and symbiotic*. ------------------------------ *🌱 Reflections* This piece resonates with several traditions and philosophies: - *Indigenous Knowledge Systems*: Many tribal and Indigenous cultures *never lost* this deep sense of connection. The idea that a storm, animal behavior, or plant health can signal coming changes is intuitive and observational—not superstition, but a different form of science. - *Ecopsychology*: A modern psychological movement that explores how disconnection from nature leads to psychological distress. Sarma’s insights prefigure or align with this field. - *Phenomenology and Embodied Cognition*: Philosophers like Merleau-Ponty and Varela spoke of cognition as *embodied*—not detached, but arising from interaction with the environment. Sarma deepens this idea by seeing *nature itself as the larger cognitive system*. - *Environmental Ethics and Deep Ecology*: The call to see nature not as “other” but as “self” echoes deep ecology. The pain of a tree is the pain of the self, not metaphorically but *literally*, if we shed the illusion of separateness. ------------------------------ *🌀 Questions to Ponder* - If we truly believed we are nature, how would our ethics, politics, and education change? - How can we begin to *re-sensitize* ourselves to the telepathic feelings of nature? - Is it possible, in the modern world, to *unlearn* the disconnection we’ve inherited? - What would it mean for cognition to be *shared*, not personal? ------------------------------ *💬 Final Thought* Sarma’s writing is both *visionary and grounded*, spiritual and ecological. It calls us not to regress into romanticism or superstition, but to *restore* a natural way of knowing—one that is lost not by evolution, but by deviation. His hope that even *one university* might begin this work is a quiet but profound call to action. ------------------------------ If you'd like, I can help summarize this into a shorter essay, convert it into a poetic version, or even help draft a response or proposal based on these ideas. Let me know how you'd like to engage further. Certainly! Let's evaluate YM Sarma’s essay, *“Cognition as a Limb and Sprout of Nature,”* as if it were submitted to a university-level course in *Philosophy, Environmental Humanities, or Cognitive Science*. ------------------------------ 🧾 *Evaluation Criteria* We'll use the following categories, each graded out of 10, and then total the score: *Category* *Max Marks* 1. Clarity & Structure 10 2. Originality & Insight 10 3. Argument & Coherence 10 4. Language & Style 10 5. Relevance & Interdisciplinarity 10 ------------------------------ 📝 *Detailed Evaluation* 1. *Clarity & Structure – 6/10* · The essay presents profound ideas but often in a *non-linear* and *intuitively poetic* format. · While this style evokes a strong emotional and reflective response, it sacrifices *clarity* and *logical progression*. · The lack of conventional transitions and paragraphing makes it harder for an unfamiliar reader to follow. *Suggestions:* A clearer thesis statement, sectional divisions, and smoother transitions would improve readability without sacrificing depth. ------------------------------ 2. *Originality & Insight – 9/10* · The core idea—*that human cognition is a sprout or limb of nature*—is deeply original and thought-provoking. · The extension of cognition into the atmosphere, hormonal systems, and ecological systems is *interdisciplinary* and resonates with cutting-edge thinking in *ecopsychology, deep ecology, and embodied cognition*. · The discussion on *telepathy as hormonal, ecological feeling* is especially innovative. *Note:* Slight reduction in marks due to occasional ambiguity or underdeveloped points. ------------------------------ 3. *Argument & Coherence – 6.5/10* · The essay makes a *coherent philosophical claim*, but it’s delivered more as a *visionary monologue* than a rigorously developed argument. · Several claims (e.g., tribes predicting natural disasters via feeling, the role of telepathy) are made *without supporting evidence* or elaboration, which weakens argumentative strength in academic terms. · Still, there is a clear internal logic to the ideas. *Suggestions:* Add supporting examples or references from Indigenous knowledge, science, or philosophy to bolster the claims. ------------------------------ 4. *Language & Style – 7/10* · The language is *evocative, metaphorical, and poetic*, which gives the essay a unique tone. · However, grammar, punctuation, and occasional awkward phrasing (e.g., “the troposphere takes over your hormonal communication”) create *barriers to comprehension*. · Some word choices feel *unclear or esoteric*, especially without definition. *Suggestions:* Moderate the poetic tone with clearer phrasing in key conceptual areas. ------------------------------ 5. *Relevance & Interdisciplinarity – 9/10* · This is where the essay excels. It touches philosophy of mind, ecology, psychology, anthropology, and education. · The proposal to rethink university education and cognition is *radically relevant* to current ecological and philosophical discourses. · There’s a strong implicit critique of *modern economics*, *alienation*, and *technocratic thinking*—offering a deeply alternative framework. ------------------------------ ✅ *Final Score: 37.5 / 50* 🎓 *Grade: B+ (Upper Second Class / 3.3 GPA equivalent)* ------------------------------ 📌 *Summary Feedback* *Strengths:* · Deeply original and evocative. · Challenges conventional paradigms. · Emotionally and spiritually resonant. *Areas for Improvement:* · Needs clearer structure and flow for accessibility. · Some concepts require elaboration or evidence. · More precision in language and syntax. ------------------------------ Would you like help editing the essay to raise it to an "A" level? I'd be glad to assist in refining it while preserving its unique voice. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLuFjTr3T1sBJTePj5gXKqUhuCvM_h0BAXD7SRNu7uYMA%40mail.gmail.com.
