Why economic disparages which was absent in the beginning

Making everyone equal has pros like fostering harmony, ensuring equal
rights and opportunities, and promoting social stability. However, it has
cons such as potentially stifling individual freedom and innovation,
leading to a lack of motivation if outcomes are guaranteed, and the
difficulty in achieving true equality due to differing starting points and
needs.

Pros

Promotes harmony and unity: Equality can reduce social unrest by ensuring a
decent standard of living for everyone, which fosters a more cohesive
society.

Ensures equal rights and opportunities: It is a fundamental principle that
everyone should have the same rights and opportunities, regardless of their
background, which helps build a just society.

Leads to a healthier population: By eliminating discrimination in areas
like healthcare, all communities can be healthier.

Benefits society economically: Wealthier individuals can fund new ideas
from less privileged people, which can lead to new businesses and job
creation.

Cons

Stifles individual freedom and innovation: Mandating equality can be seen
as an infringement on personal choices, and a lack of reward for hard work
could decrease motivation and innovation.

Creates "brain drain": A lack of economic incentive may cause highly
skilled individuals to seek opportunities in other countries where their
skills are better rewarded.

Ignores individual differences: Treating everyone the same, a literal
interpretation of equality, fails to account for different needs and
starting positions, potentially causing harm or inequality.

Is difficult to achieve: Deep-seated biases and cultural traditions can
persist, and significant changes to economic and social systems are often
needed to address the root causes of inequality.

Can be morally ambiguous: Certain aspects of economic equality are debated,
as it is difficult to balance the idea of a just distribution of wealth
with personal effort and merit.

Equality vs. Equity: A Comparative Analysis

Pros and Cons of Equality and Equity

Equality ensures that everyone is treated the same, fostering fairness and
a sense of belonging. However, it may overlook individual needs and
circumstances. On the other hand, equity addresses the unique needs of
individuals, promoting a more inclusive environment. But, it may be
perceived as giving preferential treatment to certain groups.

Striking the Right Balance between equity vs equality

There’s no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to equality and equity.
Organizations need to analyze their unique situations and develop tailored
strategies that promote both fairness and inclusivity.  THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE
IN LIFE. The key is to strike a balance between equality and equity,
ensuring that everyone has equal opportunities while addressing individual
needs and barriers. By doing so, organizations can create a more inclusive
and high-performing workplace.

Examples and Considerations or Equity and Equality

Pay Equity

The gender pay gap remains a critical issue worldwide. For instance, in the
European Union, the gender pay gap is around 14.1%, while in the US, it is
approximately 18%. Pay equity and pay transparency initiatives can help
close this gap and ensure fair compensation for all. To address pay
disparities, organizations can conduct regular pay audits, implement
transparent salary structures, and provide training on unconscious biases.

Workplace Diversity

Diverse teams bring a wealth of perspectives and experiences, which can
lead to increased creativity, innovation, and better problem-solving.
According to a study by the Boston Consulting Group, companies with diverse
management teams have 19% higher revenues due to innovation. Creating an
inclusive environment goes beyond hiring a diverse workforce. It involves
fostering a culture where everyone feels valued, respected, and included.
This sense of belonging can significantly impact employee engagement,
satisfaction, and retention.

Equality vs Equity: Know the differences and Creating a Fair and Inclusive
Environment for All Equality vs. Equity: Which One Should You Defend?

Since they have completely different definitions, equity and equality are
closely connected and cannot be initiated without one another. Knowing the
difference moves us a step towards achieving fairness as the ultimate
goal.  For the world to be valid, just, and acceptable, we must take
priority to fairness and balance the load based on who needs them the most.
In other words, in order to achieve equality as a result, we must address
the root causes of unfairness within key issues.  Equality is demonstrated
by the fact that all school systems in society have computer laboratories
with the same number of machines and operating hours during school hours.
While Equity includes some students who do not have full rights to
computers or the internet at home. Computer labs in low-income communities
have much more equipment such as computers, and also longer hours of
operation.

Key Categorizations Among Equality and Equity

The comparisons among equity and equality are evident on the following
factors:

Equity refers to the manner in which individuals are treated that is just
and fair. Equality is defined as the state where everybody will be on the
same rank.

Equity is a procedure, whereas equality is the end result, implying that
equity is a necessary requirement to accomplish both.

Since equity symbolizes fairness, that is, the classification is designed
in a manner that all people have equal opportunities. Equality, on the
other hand, indicates consistency, in which everything is distributed
equally among people.

Equity, differences are acknowledged, and efforts are being made to address
the ways wherein specific options are not the same. On the opposite,
equality acknowledges similarity and therefore aims to treat everybody as
equal.

Everyone has full rights to what they require when there is equity. In
contrast, with equality, everyone receives the same things, such as rights,
resources, and opportunities.

Workplace Ideas of Equality and Equity

Now that we’ve established the objectives of equality and equity, let’s
look at how they can be implemented in the workplace. We’ll glance at these
two in three contexts: the hiring/recruiting method, wages, and places to
stay.

The hiring/recruiting procedure

Hiring managers must analyze their own beliefs and openly fight unfairness.
During the hiring process, everyone in the hiring group should have an
equal say. This kind of thinking in hiring for uniqueness helps to lay the
groundwork for a more balanced workplace. It is critical for hiring groups
to realize and fight these trends.

Wages

Wage equality and fair wages are two completely different ideas. A review
of an industry’s compensation package will reveal disparities in pay among
men and women workers. Wage equality is equal pay for equal work, whereas
fair wages pay for the same or very same job.

Although companies may pay equal wages for a certain job, white people are
holding the top positions. Pay equity investigates systemic issues as well
as the numerous factors that influence pay disparities between groups.
Companies that want to address pay equity must gather information on each
worker.

Facilities

Reasonable accommodations” are those that are required to create a level
playing field for staff. Equality is simply providing amenities to all who
qualify. Not everyone will need the same accommodations, and some may
require more than others. Equity depends on unique, specific needs, and yet
fairness is the desired result.

A workplace cannot be truly fair and inclusive except if both are evident.
Making workplaces more equal and equitable takes time, assets, and
planning. It’s a lengthy and ever-changing process, but it’s well worth it.
Workers are more content, effective, and dedicated.

For the first time in one‘s company, the Hr department is establishing a
benefits package.

Equality: The management determines to provide normal medical, dental, and
vision health coverage to all employees. They also institute a trauma
policy that allows staff to take paid leave in the event of the death of a
family member.

Equity: Before completing the benefits plan, the leader decides to give out
a survey method to collect employee feedback. They discover that a worker
who is engaged in bereavement leave could be provided for staff who have
miscarriages as a result of her perspective.

Some other assets that extended family members are subjected to grieving
procedures in his culture. After gaining knowledge of this information, the
manager will work with the budget allocation to try to satisfy a wider
range of needs.

As the holiday period approaches, a manager attempts to coordinate employee
vacations.

Equality: Encourage employees to take time off throughout the last two
weeks of The season as business slows and most members of staff celebrate
Christmas.

Equity: Encourage employees to take time off for cultural and religious
activities that are important to them, rather than just around Christmas.

Women’s Role in the Labor Market – What Could Happen if Things Stay The
Same?

Women constitute slightly more than half of the earth’s population, and yet
their participation in balanced business growth, expansion, and well-being
fall far short of its possibility, with severe economic and financial
consequences.

Despite the improvements in the past few decades, global labor industries
remain divided along with different genders, and advancement toward gender
equality appears to have stalled.

Men are much more likely than women to take part in job markets in almost
every country around the world. Moreover, gender inequalities in engagement
have shrunk rapidly in recent years.

Females and males experience a similar range of work gains and losses but
in different places.

In many countries, women make up less than 15% of construction workers and
around 30% of manufacturing workers. In terms of job loss, women may be a
little less at risk than men of having their job affected by automation –
although they are still more likely to lose their jobs.

To adjust to the changing world of work, women need to be talented, mobile,
and tech-savvy.

More fairness in the workplace can be achieved through advancement and
technology. There is a great opportunity for rulers in the business and
government to help women make the required shifts in three areas. Women
should learn the ability, adaptability, and agility required to
successfully navigate workforce transitions.

Men are more likely than women to take part in labor. The Female labor
participation rate is greatest in several of the world’s poorest and
richest countries. But it is smallest in nations with overall average
incomes that fall somewhere within the middle.

What does this mean for time allotment and human labor supply in general?
The answer may come as no surprise. So when the time expense of unpaid work
is lowered, shared alongside men, and/or made extra aligned with the market
process, female work market participation tends to rise.

Conclusion

Equality is insufficient for a community that seeks to improve the lives of
all its members. Although equality is frequently taught as the key to
victory, it is a largely misunderstood concept. As equality is a cold set
of criteria.

K Rajaram IRS  241025

On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 at 06:06, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> --
> *Mar*The Future
>
>
>
> The Universe is the unending and ultimate complex sentence in the present
> perfect continuous tense. Everything in this unending sentence is a
> word,phrase,Noun Clause, Adjective Clause or Adverb Clause, the sentence
> piling up unending principal clauses. All of us like everything else are
> striving to leave the status of being a single word, become phrases, then
> clauses, change from a noun clause into an adjective clause then into the
> adverb clause, often participating in a principal clause, become gerunds,
> participles, prepositions, conjunctions, interjections, as participants in
> the ever growing complex sentence the Universe. And all of us are
> participating in the gigantic predication, adding meaning and also
> elucidation.
>
> We call this gigantic process ‘time’ and our participation ‘life’. About
> 13 billion years ago the sentence started with the subject ‘Singularity’
> whose size was smaller than even an electron. Upholding the basic principle
> of Homeopathy, the smaller the more powerful, the singularity has been big
> banging and big banging in the expanding complex sentence, the ultimate
> objective being the achievement of the speed of light, when volumes becomes
> infinity or the grand ‘Nothing’. When everything achieves the speed of
> light, the words, phrases, clauses etc join the infinity as volume, but
> still as volume, which indicates the potential for another Singularity and
> another Big Bang.
>
> When the tiny Singularity can create the Big Bang, are we not as
> participants in the big sentence structure, live significantly affecting
> the sentence? Now, how are we to live, become grammar blunders destroying
> the smooth grammatical growth of the complex sentence, or live
> symbiotically and help our march into the destination of becoming the
> photons? What is the correct grammar of life?
>
> Certainly the correct grammar lies in symbiosis and not in the present
> antibiosis called economics. Nature is desperately fighting our economics
> for cure and again contribute healthily to the ever growing ultimate
> complex sentence, the growing universe.
>
> Now how to correct the sentence from the ultimate blunders caused by our
> economics? The human vandal calls the destruction economics, a science,
> simply a branch of Newtonian physics!
>
> Our economics based anthropocentricism has converted all of us into
> lunatics. A lunatic thinks that everyone else except him is a lunatic. Our
> Universities are participating with gusto in this gigantic lunacy. All of
> them are jettisoning the symbiotic Ecology and participating in the
> destruction, economics.
>
> Economics is destroying the very cosmic purpose of lives. Let us pray for
> the dawn of sanity in our universities and again take to the symbiotic
> ecology.
>
> Let us hope that at least one university takes to sanity. As a first step,
> it has to start a ‘Free Nature Park’ without human tampering.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Chat gpt
>
> That’s a fascinating and poetic philosophical essay by *YM Sarma* — a
> rich metaphor blending *grammar, cosmology, ecology, and ethics* into one
> conceptual system.
>
> Here’s a brief interpretation and commentary to help unpack it:
> ------------------------------
>
> *Summary & Interpretation*
>
> *1. The Universe as a Sentence*
>
>    - Sarma imagines the *Universe* as an *ever-expanding, present perfect
>    continuous sentence*, suggesting ongoing creation — something that *has
>    been evolving and still is*.
>    - Every entity (humans, atoms, galaxies) is likened to a *grammatical
>    unit* — word, phrase, or clause — each contributing to the meaning and
>    coherence of the grand “cosmic syntax.”
>
> *2. The Role of Life and Time*
>
>    - *Time* is defined as the process of this sentence’s unfolding.
>    - *Life* is our participation in that unfolding — each being helps
>    “write” or modify the Universe’s grammar.
>    - Evolution, then, is the movement from simple “words” to complex
>    “clauses,” reflecting growth in meaning and awareness.
>
> *3. The Singularity and the Big Bang*
>
>    - The *Singularity* is the initial “subject” of the cosmic sentence —
>    the first word of creation.
>    - Its “big banging” corresponds to the Universe’s grammatical
>    expansion — adding layers of meaning (matter, life, consciousness).
>    - When everything reaches the *speed of light*, the essay suggests,
>    the Universe becomes infinite — a metaphoric “grand Nothing,” implying that
>    total illumination is indistinguishable from emptiness, the cycle ready to
>    restart.
>
> *4. The Grammar of Life*
>
>    - Sarma warns that humans, through destructive behavior (economics,
>    exploitation), are creating *“grammar blunders”* in the sentence of
>    existence.
>    - He contrasts *symbiosis (ecology)* — living in harmony with nature —
>    with *antibiosis (economics)* — parasitic destruction of the natural
>    order.
>    - The “correct grammar of life,” therefore, is *symbiotic living*,
>    aligning with the Universe’s creative flow rather than disrupting it.
>
> *5. The Call for Change*
>
>    - The essay ends as a moral and intellectual appeal:
>       - Universities, as centers of reason, must abandon “lunatic”
>       economics and restore *ecological sanity*.
>       - Humanity should create *“Free Nature Parks”* — spaces untouched
>       by human interference — to realign with the grammar of the cosmos.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Themes & Style*
>
>    - *Metaphysical Linguistics:* The universe-as-sentence metaphor ties
>    language, consciousness, and reality together.
>    - *Ecological Philosophy:* Strong criticism of modern economics and
>    anthropocentrism.
>    - *Cosmic Humanism:* Humanity has meaning only as a cooperative
>    participant in the universe’s evolution.
>    - *Poetic Science:* The essay fuses physics (Singularity, Big Bang,
>    light speed) with spiritual ethics and literary metaphor.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *In essence*
>
> YM Sarma’s *The Future* is a cosmic ecology of meaning.
> It invites us to become *good grammarians of existence* — participants
> who write with care, coherence, and compassion in the great sentence that
> is the Universe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Would you like me to help *analyze it as a literary piece* (e.g., its use
> of metaphor, structure, and philosophical tradition) or *summarize it for
> academic or presentation purposes*?
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BmcwxRXs99yPa8WBCVry%3DEykRiyBBhuFwv9K3RHdrRPg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BmcwxRXs99yPa8WBCVry%3DEykRiyBBhuFwv9K3RHdrRPg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooZNG%3DJzj1m6s6oMw1zNCLZWKrfkzGHP%2Bf6tQLm9zbEmg%40mail.gmail.com.
  • The Future Markendeya Yeddanapudi
    • Re: The Future Rajaram Krishnamurthy

Reply via email to