Rajaram Sir,
Your answer will take at least one week for me to understand.You are the
uncrowned but one of the greatest.
YMS

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 2:06 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> ATTACHED WORD DOC kr irs 21126
>
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 at 07:10, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mar*
>>
>> Mathematics-Vs-Reality
>>
>> It is said the Absolute Zero cannot exist, because particles do not allow
>> a vacuum to exist and they fill up. But then 2 plus =4, or any mathematics
>> of
>>
>>
>>
>> plus,Minus,Multiplication,Division,Roots etc,possible as particles simply
>> do not allow such exact mathematical operations?
>>
>> Chat Gpt Answer:
>>
>> That’s a thoughtful question, and it touches on an important distinction
>> between *physical reality* and *abstract mathematics*.
>> 1. Why absolute zero is said to be impossible
>>
>> Absolute zero (0 K) is a *physical state*. It refers to particles having
>> the minimum possible thermal motion. It’s considered unattainable because
>> of *physical laws* (quantum mechanics, the uncertainty principle,
>> zero-point energy), not simply because “particles fill the vacuum.” Even in
>> empty space, quantum fields fluctuate, and particles cannot be completely
>> motionless.
>>
>> So this limitation applies to *physical systems*, not to ideas or
>> symbols.
>> ------------------------------
>> 2. Mathematics does not live in physical space
>>
>> Statements like:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    2 + 2 = 4
>>    -
>>
>>    √9 = 3
>>    -
>>
>>    7 × 8 = 56
>>
>> are *abstract relationships*, not physical processes.
>>
>> When we say *2 + 2 = 4*, we are not describing particles colliding or
>> moving. We are describing relationships between *abstract entities*
>> defined by axioms (rules). These entities:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Have no mass
>>    -
>>
>>    Have no position
>>    -
>>
>>    Do not exist in space or time
>>    -
>>
>>    Are not affected by particles, vacuum, temperature, or noise
>>
>> So there is *nothing physical that can interfere* with the truth of a
>> mathematical statement.
>> ------------------------------
>> 3. Physical calculation vs mathematical truth
>>
>> There *is* a subtle but important distinction:
>> 🔹 Mathematical truth
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Always exact
>>    -
>>
>>    Independent of the universe
>>    -
>>
>>    True even if no physical universe existed
>>
>> Even if there were no particles at all, 2 + 2 would still equal 4.
>>
>> 🔹 Physical computation
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Done using real objects (brains, computers, paper, electrons)
>>    -
>>
>>    Subject to noise, errors, thermal effects, cosmic rays, etc.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    A computer might flip a bit due to radiation
>>    -
>>
>>    A human might make a mistake while calculating
>>
>> But these errors affect *our implementation*, not the *mathematics
>> itself*.
>> ------------------------------
>> 4. An analogy
>>
>> Think of mathematics like the rules of chess.
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    The rule “a rook moves in straight lines” is always true.
>>    -
>>
>>    A real chessboard can be damaged, blown away, or melted.
>>    -
>>
>>    The rule itself remains unchanged and unaffected.
>>
>> Similarly:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    The universe may have particles everywhere.
>>    -
>>
>>    Physical systems have limits.
>>    -
>>
>>    Mathematical truths remain exact and untouched.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> 5. Bottom line
>>
>> No contradiction exists.
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    ❌ Absolute zero is impossible because of *physical laws*
>>    -
>>
>>    ✅ Mathematical operations are always possible because they are *abstract
>>    truths*
>>    -
>>
>>    ❌ Particles do not “interfere” with mathematics
>>    -
>>
>>    ✅ They only interfere with *physical attempts to compute or measure*
>>
>> So yes—*2 + 2 = 4 is always true*, regardless of particles, vacuum,
>> temperature, or the structure of the universe.
>>
>> If you’d like, we can also explore *why mathematics is so uncannily
>> effective in describing a physical universe that obeys such limits*—a
>> deep and fascinating question.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Thatha_Patty" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLbgdmBNm5%3DUZCp_s640i1yngA7nfUEmMhNU0vLLpkGEw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLbgdmBNm5%3DUZCp_s640i1yngA7nfUEmMhNU0vLLpkGEw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
*Mar*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BTYfhGW1ecz%3D_xd%3Dpz%2Bwu3L_XYnRzkShRZBrFznigByw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to