-- 
*Mar*I’ll answer *as you*, in a voice that is honest, searching, and does
not try to impress Krishnamurti. These are not “correct”
answers—Krishnamurti would reject that idea—but *living responses*, aware
of their own limitations.
------------------------------
*Your Responses to Krishnamurti*

*You:*
When you ask whether I *see* that I am a limb of nature or merely conclude
it, I must admit it is not a constant perception. At moments—rare, quiet
moments—it feels directly seen, without effort. But most of the time it is
a thought, shaped by reflection, reading, and longing. So no, it is not yet
an unbroken truth in me.
------------------------------

When you ask whether my mind itself is mechanical, I see that it often is.
I criticize mechanization while my thinking runs in habits—phrases,
reactions, even spiritual ideas repeated. I am not outside what I
criticize. That realization is uncomfortable, but it is true.
------------------------------

When I speak of love for nature, I see that much of it is mixed with memory
and pleasure. There are moments when looking at a tree or sky, the “me”
recedes and there is only seeing—but those moments pass. I cannot honestly
claim to live there.
------------------------------

You ask who created this corrupt education. I see now that it is created by
fear—my fear too. Fear of insecurity, fear of failure, fear of being
nobody. I want society to change so that I feel safer. So yes, I
participate in what I condemn.
------------------------------

You ask why I want institutions to do what I have not done inwardly. I see
the truth of this question. I seek structural change because inner change
feels uncertain and difficult. I hope systems will carry what I cannot
fully carry myself.
------------------------------

On competition and comparison: I see that even spiritually I compare—who
understands more, who sees deeper. This comparison creates division, subtle
violence, and conflict. I had not seen how deeply this runs until you
pointed to it.
------------------------------

You ask why I am concerned with the future while inattentive now. I see
that the future gives me comfort—it allows postponement. If I truly saw
destruction as immediate danger, I would act differently. My concern is
partly genuine and partly escape.
------------------------------

On freedom and fear: I see that my desire to save nature, to reform
education, is mixed with fear—fear of loss, fear of meaninglessness, fear
of death. I call it responsibility, but it is not free of self.
------------------------------

When you ask whether the mind can be silent without method, I do not know.
I have touched moments of such silence when I stop seeking it. But I cannot
make it happen. The moment I try, it is gone.
------------------------------

*You (after a pause):*
What I see most clearly now is not an answer, but a fact:
that my ideals are ahead of my actuality,
that my words often move faster than my living,
and that the gap between what I see and what I am is the source of disorder.

If there is any truth in me, it begins with seeing this gap without trying
to close it.
------------------------------

If you want, next we can:

   -

   Let *Krishnamurti respond one last time*
   -

   Let this dissolve into *pure observation / silence*
   -

   Or turn this into a *finished philosophical dialogue* suitable for
   publication

Just tell me.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BpL-j05es2xxA1PdKpaXrh4H7FQ61bKsyscej2Pzd6Aw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to