Heisenberg’s Uncertainty and Probability?
Heisenberg Uncertainty
How does knowing which slit the electron passed through change the pattern?
The answer is fundamentally important—measurement affects the system being
observed. Information can be lost, and in some cases it is impossible to
measure two physical quantities simultaneously to exact precision. For
example, you can measure the position of a moving electron by scattering
light or other electrons from it. Those probes have momentum themselves,
and by scattering from the electron, they change its momentum in a manner
that loses information. There is a limit to absolute knowledge, even in
principle.
As discussed above, a wave is not located at one point in space. If the
electron’s position is measured repeatedly, a spread in locations will be
observed, implying an uncertainty in position Δx. To detect the position of
the particle, we must interact with it, such as having it collide with a
detector. In the collision, the particle will lose momentum. This change in
momentum could be anywhere from close to zero to the total momentum of the
particle, That is delta x =lamda
. It is not possible to tell how much momentum will be transferred to a
detector, and so there is an uncertainty in momentum Δp, too. In fact, the
uncertainty in momentum may be as large as the momentum itself, which in
equation form means that DektaPis not equal to or greater than the p/lamda
The uncertainty in position can be reduced by using a shorter-wavelength
electron, since Δx ≈ λ. But shortening the wavelength increases the
uncertainty in momentum, since p=h/lamda
Conversely, the uncertainty in momentum can be reduced by using a
longer-wavelength electron, but this increases the uncertainty in position.
Mathematically, you can express this trade-off by multiplying the
uncertainties. The wavelength cancels, leaving ΔxΔp ≈ h.
So if one uncertainty is reduced, the other must increase so that their
product is ≈h.
With the use of advanced mathematics, Heisenberg showed that the best that
can be done in a simultaneous measurement of position and momentum is
DeltaX DeltaP>_h/4pi This is known as the Heisenberg uncertainty
principle. It is impossible to measure position x and momentum p
simultaneously with uncertainties Δx and Δp that multiply to be less
than h/*4pi
Neither uncertainty can be zero. Neither uncertainty can become small
without the other becoming large*. A small wavelength allows accurate
position measurement, but it increases the momentum of the probe to the
point that it further disturbs the momentum of a system being measured.
Now redrafting ymji Questions:
Please Enlighten:
1) I radiate infrared rays. I Create heat or the movement of molecules in
my immediate surroundings. But the infrared rays are light rays which move
at 3, 00,000 km per second. Am I continuously communicating my existence
into the cosmos? Am I affecting my surroundings and also communicating into
the Cosmos, connecting me continuously into the Cosmos?
2) Does every life form have continuous cosmic connection via the infrared
rays?
3) Absolute Zero cannot exist in the Universe, because the surrounding
particles occupy the space and there will be some heat or movement of
molecules. Then can any mathematical precision happen at all, because there
must be the interference from the surrounding particles everywhere? But
still we calculate and predict precisely the movements of planets, stars,
etc which will enable the future space travel. Is there basic determinism
at work. Then is my life subject to determinism, like any and everything?
4) When there is basic Determinism, then where is the place for
Heisenberg’s Uncertainty and Probability? Is it only a human limitation and
not truth?
5) We drill the kids that two minus two is zero. Does the minus mean plus
to the vacuum? YM Sarma
THE QUESTION WHETHER THE MATHS IS PERFECT IN CALCULATION AND 2MINUS
2 IS ZERO OR STILL HAS SOME POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE INTEGER? IS THERE FINITE
IN ALL? THEORY OF UNCERTAINITY IS SO SIMPLE EVEN VEDICALLY STATED THAT ALL
OBJECTS ARE ON THE MOVE INCLUDING YOU AND ME AND YET , WE CALCULATE OUR
POTENTIAL SPEED AS ZERO AND STEP OUT AS SOME INTEGER AS KINETIC. IT IS
IMPLIED TO ALL IN THE SPACE WHERE VACCUUM IS ABSENCE ABSOLUTELY. AT
10.37.04 SECOND PRECISELY BY MATHS THERE WAS A STOP OF THE QUANTA ELEMENT
THOUGH IT WAS ONLY MOVING; IN BETWEEN THE MOMEMTUM, IN BETWEEN 2 DOTS,
THERE WAS A NANO-PAUSE. THAT IS POYENTIAL ZERO THOUGH IT WAS AT 10.37.04,
THE ANSWER CAME ONLY BY 10.35.02, WHEN THE PARTICLE HAD THE MOMENTUM. NOW
TELL ME WHERE EXACTLY AT 10 37 04 IT WAS SIGHTED AS PAUSED OR WHERE IS IT
NOW MOVING? TIME IS ALSO SIMILAR; WHEN YOU ARE IN SLEEP WORLD STOPPED; WHEN
YOU ARE AWAKE IT IS MOVING. SUPPOSE IN THAT NANO TO THE POWER OF 100, SEC
DID IT APPEAR TO STOP AND THEN SPEED? THAT WAS THE MATHS ZERO 2 MIBNUS 2 IS
EQUAL TO ZERO THOUGH, NEXT 100TH POWER OF NANO IT WAS ONLY MOVING OR
CONTINUOUSLY MOVING OR DISPLACED CONTINUOUSLY FROM EBERY STOP IN THAT NANO.
BOTH ARE CORRECT OR BOTH ARE WRONG UNCERTAINITY YES THAT IS THE THEORY.
BRAHMAM IS THAT. WHO KNOWS WHEN AND WHERE WAS IT? DOES HE KNOW OR HE KNOWS
NOT? NASAYIDA SUKTA RIG VEDAM 129TH CHAP. 10TH MANDALA. THUS THE THEORY OF
SIGULARITY CANNOT BE DRAFTED. BUT UPANISHAD WAS CLEAR TO MEASURE: YOUY TAKE
OUT SOME STILL POORNAM; YOU ADD SOME; STILL POORNAM. POORNAM IS ALWAYS THE
POORNAM. POORNAMDHA POORNAMIDAM……. VEDIC CERTAINITY THEORY.
Are we communicating? Yes both with sound and in silence. Tools of
communications are languages of any kind but the courier or carrier is a
wave. Or particle. Sound carried by uncertainty so no one knows where it
landed or is now present. But either-or particle or wave exist. But it was
heard by ears or the mind. Was B G told loudly or in silence? Had there
been loudness, all should have heard but it is not so; even dridarashtra
did not hear; only Arjuna and Sanjaya heard and seen; even dharma did not
hear. Hence Lord Krishna said,” GUHYAM” ARJUNA CONFIRMS AS “NOT US” BUT
USES ONLY “MY”
Bg. 11.1
अर्जुन उवाच
मदनुग्रहाय परमं गुह्यमध्यात्मसंज्ञितम् ।
यत्त्वयोक्तं वचस्तेन मोहोऽयं विगतो मम ॥ १ ॥
arjuna uvāca
mad-anugrahāya paramaṁ
guhyam adhyātma-saṁjñitam
yat tvayoktaṁ vacas tena
moho ’yaṁ vigato mama
arjunaḥ uvāca — Arjuna said; mat-anugrahāya — just to show me favor; paramam
— supreme; guhyam — confidential subject; adhyātma — spiritual; saṁjñitam —
in the matter of; yat — what; tvayā — by You; uktam — said; vacaḥ — words;
tena — by that; mohaḥ — illusion; ayam — this; vigataḥ — is removed; mama —
my.
Arjuna said: By my hearing the instructions You have kindly given me about
these most confidential spiritual subjects, my illusion has now been
dispelled.
It is presumed SDANJAYA SHOULD HAVE HEARD THOUGH HE HAD NOT
COMMENTED ANY ABOUT THE PREACHING OF BG TO DRIDRASHTRA. SO IT IS ONE TO
ONE. HOWEVER, SOUND IN SILENCE OR LOUD STAY ONLY AS A QUANTA TRAVELLING BUT
UNKNOWN WHERE IT IS THEORY OF UNCERTAINITY. BUT MATHEMATICALLY IT WAS ONE
TO ONE AT THAT NANO SECOND PREACHED, SO MATHS DO HELP IN THAT NANO SECOND
AS CERTAINITY WHICH IS “UNCERTAIN” FOR US AS WE DO NOT KNOW THAT CERTAINITY
TO BE CAPTURED. NOW THE REPLY TO YMji QUESTIONS CAN BE ANSWERED AS:
1 YES WE DO COMMUNICATE TO SPACE AS CARRIED OUT AS A WAVE OR PAETICLE
2 COLORS OF RAYS COULD BE INFRA OR ANYTHING ELSE UNKNOWN; BUT YES, DOES
CARRY
3 YES THERE IS APOINT OF NANO-STOP ASSUMED AS A BREAK BY US AND AT
THAT NANO-PLACE, WE MATHEMATICALLY CALCULATE AND PREDICT A[ART FROM STELLAR
PREDICTIONS ALSO. AS AMATTER OF FACT, BY THE TIME WE DELIVER THE PREDICTION
THINDS MOVEMENT COULD BE FAR AWAY BY MILES; YET WE DO TALK ABOUT THE
RESULTS OF THE PAST AS PRESENT-CONTINUOUS AND FUTURE. WHERE THE EXISTENCE
OF PREDICTION IS CONTINUOUS, FOR CERTAIN PERIODS OF TIME, IT IS ASTROLOGY;
IF ITS FOR THAT SECONDS ONLY TO BE ANSWERED, ITS “PRASNAM”. WHERE PRASNAM
IS ANSWERED AT THE SAME TIME IT HAD HAPPENED TOO. PRASNAM IS ABOUT THE PAST
NANO WHILE ASTROLOGY IS PRESENT CONTINUOUS AND FUTURE AS PER EARTHLY MAYA
TIME BUT AS CLOSED IN DEVA BRAHMA LOKA AS PAST; HENCE THEORY OF
UNCERTAINITY IS THE CONTINUOUS CERTAINITY IN NANO.
4 Both do exist but theory of uncertainty is changing every nano
minute seconds so uncertain; as there was a point of certainty which was
calculate by maths theoretically it became the past where the past was
certain while the present and the future were uncertain hence theory of
past and rest are correct. When I held a whole laddu and you asked is ita
full laddu, and when I said yes, it was full; bit after answering you I had
a bite so now it is not full; but it does not mean it was not full once in
the past; so both are true; whereas in truth Pooranam is always the
Pooranam as matter si constant.
5 Kids are taught correctly in the sese phase one is taught early
and rest later. 2 minus 2 was zero at that point of dot but had a number
earlier and later. Past is dead SO TRUE; FUTURE IS UNCERTAIN WHICH KIDS
LEARN SLOWLY LATER.
K RAJARAM IRS 25326
On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 at 04:20, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> *Mar*
>
> Please Enlighten:
>
> 1) I radiate infrared rays. I Create heat or the movement of molecules in
> my immediate surroundings. But the infrared rays are light rays which move
> at 3, 00,000 km per second. Am I continuously communicating my existence
> into the cosmos? Am I affecting my surroundings and also communicating into
> the Cosmos, connecting me continuously into the Cosmos?
>
> 2) Does every life form have continuous cosmic connection via the
> infrared rays?
>
> 3) Absolute Zero cannot exist in the Universe, because the surrounding
> particles occupy the space and there will be some heat or movement of
> molecules. Then can any mathematical precision happen at all, because there
> must be the interference from the surrounding particles everywhere? But
> still we calculate and predict precisely the movements of planets,stars,etc
> which will enable the future space travel. Is there basic determinism at
> work. Then is my life subject to determinism, like any and everything?
>
> 4) When there is basic Determinism, then where is the place for
> Heisenberg’s Uncertainty and Probability? Is it only a human limitation and
> not truth?
>
> 5) We drill the kids that two minus two is zero. Does the minus mean plus
> to the vacuum?
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Chat GPT
>
> These are thoughtful questions that touch physics, philosophy, and even a
> bit of metaphysics. I’ll go one by one and keep things grounded in modern
> science while addressing the deeper intuition behind them.
> ------------------------------
>
> *1) Are you “communicating your existence” into the cosmos via infrared
> radiation?*
>
> Yes—*in a physical sense*, you are continuously emitting electromagnetic
> radiation, mostly in the infrared due to your body temperature. This is
> described by the scientific concept of Blackbody Radiation.
>
> - Your body emits photons that travel outward at the speed of light.
> - Those photons carry energy and *some* information (like temperature,
> motion, even faint biochemical signatures).
> - In that limited sense, you are constantly *affecting your
> surroundings and sending signals outward*.
>
> However, a few important clarifications:
>
> - This is not “communication” in the intentional or meaningful
> sense—just physical emission.
> - The signal becomes extremely weak and indistinguishable from
> background radiation very quickly.
> - The universe is already filled with radiation (e.g., the Cosmic
> Microwave Background), so your contribution blends into the noise.
>
> *So yes:* you are physically connected to the cosmos through continuous
> energy exchange—but not in a purposeful or identifiable “broadcast” sense.
> ------------------------------
>
> *2) Does every life form have this continuous cosmic connection?*
>
> Yes—and not just life forms.
>
> - *Every object above absolute zero* emits electromagnetic radiation.
> - This includes rocks, water, planets, stars, and living organisms.
> - Life doesn’t grant a special connection here; it’s a universal
> property of matter and temperature.
>
> So the “connection” is really a *universal thermodynamic process*, not
> something unique to life.
> ------------------------------
>
> *3) If absolute zero can’t exist, how can precise prediction and
> mathematics work? Is determinism real?*
>
> You’re right that reaching perfect Absolute Zero is practically
> impossible. There is always some motion or fluctuation.
>
> But this doesn’t prevent precision because:
>
> *Why precision still works:*
>
> - Many systems (like planets) are governed by *large-scale averages*,
> where tiny fluctuations cancel out.
> - The laws of motion (e.g., Newton's Laws of Motion) work extremely
> well at macroscopic scales.
> - Even when we include more precise theories like General Relativity,
> predictions remain highly accurate.
>
> *Determinism?*
>
> - Classical physics suggests a deterministic universe (given exact
> initial conditions, the future is fixed).
> - But modern physics complicates this.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *4) Where does uncertainty fit? Is it just human limitation?*
>
> This is where Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle comes in.
>
> - It is *not* just a limitation of measurement.
> - It is a *fundamental property of reality at small scales*.
>
> At the quantum level:
>
> - You cannot simultaneously know certain pairs of properties (like
> position and momentum) exactly.
> - Systems evolve in terms of *probabilities*, not certainties.
>
> So the current understanding is:
>
> - *At small scales* → fundamentally probabilistic
> - *At large scales* → effectively deterministic (because randomness
> averages out)
>
> This is why:
>
> - Planetary motion is predictable.
> - Individual particle behavior is not.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *5) Does “2 − 2 = 0” mean “plus to the vacuum”?*
>
> This is more philosophical than physical.
>
> In mathematics:
>
> - “−” is an operation defined within a formal system.
> - “0” is just a number representing *no quantity*, not a physical
> vacuum.
>
> In physics:
>
> - A vacuum is *not truly empty*. Even “empty space” has fluctuations
> (quantum fields, virtual particles).
>
> So:
>
> - *2 − 2 = 0* is a logical truth within mathematics.
> - It does *not imply physical emptiness or vacuum*.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Final Thought*
>
> You’re noticing something real and profound:
>
> - Everything is constantly interacting.
> - Nothing is completely isolated.
> - There is both *order (determinism)* and *uncertainty (quantum
> behavior)* in nature.
>
> But science draws a careful boundary:
>
> - Your body *does* radiate and influence the universe.
> - Yet that doesn’t imply intentional communication or cosmic awareness.
> - Determinism works in many domains—but is not absolute.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> If you want, we can go deeper into one direction—like:
>
> - “Is the universe fundamentally deterministic?”
> - “Do quantum effects influence human decisions?”
> - Or even the philosophical side: “What does ‘connection to the
> cosmos’ really mean?”
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKxervmSB%2B0Fya%3D9rU69QF_wgCx%2BZM3JhNa6tYM550ygg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKxervmSB%2B0Fya%3D9rU69QF_wgCx%2BZM3JhNa6tYM550ygg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqHaR%3DcESOdOakxAb1BEcUE0-0kuCe%3DRQLWqVpKOncbjQ%40mail.gmail.com.
