I would think z=np.dot(x,y) is more meaningful but anyway apparently dot()
has different meanings in Theano's world.
thanks
On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 3:59:14 PM UTC-7, Buruk Aregawi wrote:
>
> It seems that np.dot is interpreting this as the more standard A*x where A
> is a 2x3 matrix and x is a 3 dimensional vector. Where as theano is
> interpreting it is X*A where X is a 3x1 matrix and A is a 2x3 matrix.
> If you do
> z = T.dot(x,y)
> instead of
> z = np.dot(x,y)
> they will both work the same and the theano function will interpret it as
> the standard A*x.
>
> On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 5:55:10 PM UTC-4, DL_user wrote:
>>
>> Why do these two functions have different outputs, even both of them
>> defined from numpy's dot() function:
>>
>> x = T.dmatrix('x')
>>
>> y = T.dvector('y')
>>
>> z = np.dot(x,y)
>>
>> f = theano.function([x,y],z)
>>
>> f([[1,2,3],[4,5,6]],[7,8,9])
>> Out[31]:
>> array([[ 7., 16., 27.],
>> [28., 40., 54.]])
>>
>> np.dot([[1,2,3],[4,5,6]],[7,8,9])
>> Out[32]: array([ 50, 122])
>>
>
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"theano-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
