This is a real bombshell of a story - not only the report on Monsanto and our milk supply - but how truthful investigative journalism is under attack by our corporate owned media.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Norma" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: CLG fw-REPORTERS SUE FOX TV-INSIDE STORY


> The following story is just another example of  BushCo infringing on free
> speech rights. Folks, the media sold WeThePeople out. All we hear from the
> media are lies and half-truths to the point that it's hard to discern what
> is legitimate. Keep a fine tuned ear to the ground and hope like hell the
> few honest media persons will come to realize that this isn't the America
we
> came to love and honor. Connect the dots. It all becomes crystal clear!
>
> REPORTERS SUE FOX TV-INSIDE STORY
>
>  by
> Steve Wilson and Jane Akre
>
> I used to think there was nothing worse than seeing a good story killed
> because the special interest of a news organization (or one its friends or
> advertisers) was more important than the public interest. I just found out
> the hard way that I was wrong. There is something much, much worse -- and
> it's something that should concern all of us because as corporate owners
> control more and more newsrooms, it will happen again.
>
> The investigative report produced by me and my reporting colleague Jane
Akre
> was not killed by Fox Television. Instead, as we explain in a lawsuit we
> filed this past week, Fox managers and their lawyers ordered us to
distort,
> twist, and slant a story and threatened us with immediate dismissal if we
> would not broadcast material we knew to be false and misleading.
>
> Some of you may remember I posted a note here asking for objective advice
> about what to do months ago when we were doing the same kind of
> soul-searching I know some of you have been through. (I couldn't identify
> the reporters or the news organization back then.) Most of you said,
"Resist
> those kinds of instructions!"
>
> As we detail in our lawsuit, when we did just that. Fox threatened to fire
> us within 48 hours and we were told they'd just get another reporter to do
> it after we were gone. When we said we'd file a formal complaint with the
> FCC if that happened, we were not fired but were each offered very large
> cash settlements to go away and keep quiet about the story and how it was
> handled_all of these details and written documentation including scripts,
> contracts, settlement offers, EVERYTHING in our legal complaint you can
read
> for yourself at
www.foxBGHsuit.com.
>
> Fox managers refused to kill the story because word might leak out they
> bowed to pressure applied by Monsanto and the dairy and grocery industry,
we
> explain in our suit. Monsanto directed its efforts to kill the story to
> former Republican operative and now-Fox News chief Roger Ailes. Then, over
> the course of nine months last year, we were ordered to write and re-
write
> the scripts again and again-more than 73 times in all.
>
> You should know there was never any claim that we or anyone working with
us
> ever acted outside the highest ethical standards of good investigative
> reporting. There are no issues about trespass or hidden cameras or
> pretending to be somebody else to get inside information.
>
> More importantly, at no time ever was even a single error of fact found in
> our reporting. We provided literally binders chock full of solid
> documentation to support virtually every sentence and to show how some of
> what we were ordered to report was demonstrably wrong. Little of that
> mattered as we were repeatedly told "it's not whether the facts are true,
it
> was how they are presented"_and, as we also quoted the Fox General Manager
> in our lawsuit, "We paid $3 billion for these television stations, we'll
> decide what the news is. The news is what we tell you it is."
>
> After we stood up to being fired, turned down the easy money, and all
those
> re-writes didn't wear us down, we were told we were being suspended
without
> pay but ordered to keep re-writing scripts even though we found ourselves
> locked out of our offices and the computers that held much of our
> information. We did write those final two scripts-the honest version we
> wanted to report, and the version Fox insisted on telling. Both are
attached
> to our suit and available on the web along with our objections detailed
> point-by-point in the Fox-mandated script.
>
> Finally, after a year struggling nearly a year to tell the story fairly
and
> honestly, we were advised we were being dismissed without cause pursuant
to
> a window option in our contract. Fox's own lawyer contradicts that phony
> claim in a letter (you can also review on the web) where she writes that
> although Fox had the right to dismiss us without cause, "_there were
> definite reasons for the decision that was made." She goes to explain we
> were really dismissed due to our "pattern of responding to direction with
> rancor, argument and personal attacks on the lawyers and editors". Our
legal
> claim is that the "rancor and argument" which ensued when we were ordered
to
> lie on television -- along with our statement to Fox management that we
> would complain to the FCC if the station resorted to illegal conduct in
> broadcasting news known to be false and misleading -- those were the
reasons
> we were ultimately fired. Fortunately, Florida has a whistle-blower law
that
> makes that illegal.
>
> In any event, all of us in the news business should consider that this
kind
> of conduct by business people masquerading as journalists could well be
the
> next step down the road to journalism nobody can trust or rely upon. These
> are issues that we ought to be discussing in our conferences and seminars.
> How will you handle a similar situation if it ever comes up? What, if
> anything, can be done to stop this kind of thing? And what kind of support
> could you expect if you put your career on the line over something like
> this?
>
> Jane and I would be happy to share anything we have with any of you who
want
> to pursue the original story we were trying to tell (our scripts are on
the
> web) or just want to share your opinions and suggestions about any of
this.
> We invite you to visit the web site, post a message there if you like, or
> contact us directly by e-mail.
>
> Steve Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jane Akre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
http://www.videonetwork.org/stuff/foxtv.html
>

Reply via email to