Steve, Thank you.
I actually contributed to RFC 3709 and I believe made Windows the first platform to support it, that said the branding element I am referring to in this case is different. When designing a user experience one picks colors, typefaces, layout and workflow; for example consider Coke "red" and type typical Coke typography; if the authentication experience is not consistent with the design goals of a site adoption will only happen when security is seen more important that design and ease of use. As long as that is the case in this world of consumerization of IT I don't expect client certificates to be used outside of closed communities. Ryan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Kent Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:57 AM To: Ryan Hurst Cc: 'Joe St Sauver'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [therightkey] Client Certificate Usability (was RE: Will the real RPF please stand up?) Ryan, That's a good list of additional problems associated with widespread use of client certs. Note that re the "branding" issue, there is a cert extension that allows for logos to be embedded in certs, although the focus for this is really server vs. client certs. Steve _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
