On 2/10/12 9:13 AM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Yes, I am aware of them. > >The problem with LTANS was that the catenate cert technology was still >encumbered at the time and there was a company formed to exploit the >patents that was very aggressive in filing lawsuits, including >lawsuits over stuff that they clearly had no claim to. > > >I was just going through the LTANS work to see if there was stuff we >could use. > >The big reason to not use LTANS is that they use XML signature. It >made sense for their approach but I don't see it as really working >very well with the catenate technology. You would have to fire up an >XML parser on each hop. There were two evidence record formats defined by LTANS, one in ASN.1 and (later) one in XML. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4998 - ERS http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6283 - XMLERS _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
