On Sep 11, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> We have a BoF chair volunteer who'll be able to > help start organising agenda slots etc after the > BoF approval call. More on that after the 24th. Delurking: that would be me. I didn't want to say anything until I had caught up on the list, and I still haven't, but then again it's not urgent because we don't know whether we will even get a slot. More later when we do. FWIW, I'm the one who proposed 90 minutes instead of the typical 60. My view is that there should be no more than 30-45 minutes of presentations followed by lots of mic talk. I will probably enforce a "presentations must be ready the Monday before the meeting" requirement and will encourage people to start reading and commenting on them then. The value of mic time is not "I like this and don't like that", but rather "that one idea on slide 3 makes me think of this other thing that hasn't been discussed yet". Proclamations of "this is great" and "this will never work" are more appropriate on the list; proposals of "if you add this" or "if you change that" are better uses of mic time. The fact that we might meet f2f should have little effect on the current discussion. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
