Hiya, I know we're not having a wg-forming BoF but there's a thing I think I'd like to see discussed at or before the BoF that'd normally be part of a wg-forming BoF but is still worth doing now. (Discussing this on the list since we've all read the draft is even better of course:-)
Assuming for the moment that we do go ahead and standardise CT, how many documents (RFCs) ought be used to document that? If the answer turns out to be one, then it might be more efficient to process CT as an AD sponsored draft, so if your answer to the above is 1, then I'd like input about doing that or not doing that. If the answer is more than one, then what might those be, and are there dependencies on other IETF WGs or external groups? Clearly, if the answer is more than one non-wg draft, that means that AD sponsoring is less likely and a WG is likely needed. If you think this is the case, it'd be good to see your suggestion for what RFCs ought be produced. I guess I'm sort of asking for suggestions as to what milestones a WG might adopt if we were to form one. I do realise that this is only part of the discussion that we need to have, and is contingent on us wanting to do something with CT, but I've not seen it raised so far, so thought I'd kick that off. If you're not sure about the process parts of the above (e.g. "AD sponsored") please just ask. Paul or I can answer that. Thanks, S. PS: Its ok to give your answer to this even if you think that CT should not be standardised in the IETF. If that's the case maybe say so if you want. _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
