>Why would anyone need a certificate in this system? The binding to a public >key is intrinsic to the whole naming architecture. Yes!
>Come to that, why would anyone need .dns??? If namecoin is going to replace >the DNS, >why make the mistake of upper level hierarchy? Surely the new system should be >the apex >of the hierarchy and the legacy DNS subordinated under .icann. > >I do have a solution though. There are some TLDs that are not expletives that >are almost >certain to be permanently withheld from issue. I suggest they consider using >.pot or .weed. I prefer the forest model ... every key can define a namespace: paulehoffman.com.73940a8b75ac184ddbe3ca3c2c809c67 Paul
_______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
