On 17/02/14 19:01, Melinda Shore wrote:
<snip>
5) the corollary to 4 is that I do try to get as much done on
the mailing list as possible. One thing that's been useful
in some circumstances in the past has been an issue tracker.
We do have a working group wiki page with an issue tracker,
and I'd like to get a sense of whether the working group in
general and the authors more specifically would find it
helpful in progressing the document.
Hi Melinda. Thanks for taking on the WG chair role. :-)
Given the close relationship between RFC6962(-bis) and the open-source
CT project, we've so far been logging issues for RFC6962-bis on the
issue tracker at
https://code.google.com/p/certificate-transparency/issues/list
I don't suppose it really matters which issue tracker we use. Using an
issue tracker will definitely be "helpful in progressing the document"
though, IMHO.
--
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online
_______________________________________________
therightkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
