On Nov 14, 2014, at 5:42 PM, Dr. Massimiliano Pala <massimiliano.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > (a) Defining new transport protocols for revocation information availability > (e.g., OCSP over DNS or OCSP over LDAP)
If you mean "pre-recorded (sometimes called 'stapled') OCSP responses", yes, this is useful. Maybe even over HTTP! > (b) (Possibly) defining a more lightweight revocation mechanisms (e.g. > Lightweight Revocation Tokens) Not interested. > (c) (Possibly) helping other working groups to revise and update how > revocation information are provided (e.g., the client authentication case) Not interested. > (d) (Possibly) introducing privacy consideration when it comes to revocation > checking Slightly interested. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list therightkey@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
