> Not sure how best to deal with this problem. > Maybe showing scrap-names in the debug ouput would be sufficient. Or
Agree. I had the same idea. > a separate low-res output with scraps coloured differently and labelled? > > The 'without pics' option helps somewhat here, but what I really > need is some kind of low-res scrap overview. That's easy -- use layout like scale 1 1000 symbol hide group all symbol show group wall transparency off > There is a related problem that the 1.5Mb PDF file now takes at > least 2 minutes to render on my 900Mhz laptop. Having some kind of > low-res ouput would be generally useful for checking that joins have > worked and caves have appeared would be very handy - is that at all > practical? I'm not sure where all the time goes. use the same layout -- it's much faster to display if the transparency is not used, and only passage walls are displayed. Martin
