+++ Olly Betts [05-08-18 10:13 +0100]: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:10:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote: > > But if it was photoreduced then the fonts and symbol size shouldn't change. > > If you printed the survey at 1:1000 and photoreduced it to 1:2000, the > symbols and text would be halved in size by the photoreduction. Just > printing at 1:2000 will give symbols and text twice as large as this, so > changing base-scale from 1:1000 to 1:2000 should double the symbol and > text sizes. And it sounds like it does for you...
That makes sense. Quite why I couldn't manage that logic last night I don't know. Putting that para in the thbook might allow confused people like myself to get their heads round it (as clearly the current text didn't quite do it for me). Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://www.chaos.org.uk/~wookey/
