OK, thanks, I had missed your answer or never receive it. Thanks for the reply.
I understand what you mean for the LRUD data. I had an other definition, that's why I thought there was a bug. I'll change my data to match your requirement. Thanks, Thanks for your great job ! Gilbert Stacho Mudrak a écrit : >> I noticed that the bug on the 3 D view (tool loch) for the pit view is >> still present. I sent you and email a few month ago with an exemple (the >> data put in the survey giving the dept or hight value in a vertical >> survey (a pit) is used in the 3D modele as the width of the pit. So the >> pit seems always to be very large at the top and at his bottom) > > I remember - but as far as I remember, I have also answered you on > 24-01-2008. Now I am not sure, whether you have received my answer. In > any case - it is attached below. And my problem is, I do not > understand your problem :) I am sorry - could you please draw it more > in details? Thanks. > >> for the loch tool, on a Linux computer (Ubuntu), with a 3D view (the >> same data used on windows), I can't have a color of the galery by deep. >> Colors are random. But the colors are good in the Windows release. >> Do you know this problem ? > > Yes, in the latest snapshot - this should be already fixed. > > Regards, S. > > > > P.S. Attached my answer to your previous e-mail: > > I am sorry for late answer, but sometimes it takes me a long time to get to > the > answers. I have tried the files you have submitted, but without success - I am > not sure what is wrong on the image. > > OK, the interpretation of LRUD according to therion is following (we should > probably put this into thbook): > > If passeges are horizontal (inclination < vthreshold, that can be set in > centerline), LR is perpendicular to the shot and UD is vertical. > > If passages are more or less vertical (inclination > vthreshold), even UD > becomes perpendicular to the shot - otherwise passages would not look very > good. In the case of vertical (+- 90), UD is interpreted as north-south > dimension from the station - to allow tube-like modelling of verticals. In > your > example - everything seems to me plotted correctly. > > Do I understand something wrong? > > Thanks, S. > > > Quoting "Gilbert Fernandes (mailinglist)" <gfe_list at aliceadsl.fr>: >> Hello, >> >> I notice a bug in the 3D modeling. In this short exemple you can reproduce >> the error. >> The main problem is when you have a pit, ans so a vertical survey ( compas = >> 90 or -90 ), the up and down value in survey data is used in the 3D model >> (.lox file) for the with of the pit and not for the hight (or down) of the >> galery. So pits are always as fat as they are hight. >> Look the .th file and try to change the up and down value as comment in the >> exemple, look the effect in the 3D view. >> Thanks, >> >> Gilbert >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > Therion at speleo.sk > http://www.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion >
