>On 11.1.2009, at 21:08, Bruce Mutton wrote: > >> For example, the code below gives a ? on a 2d map, but does not >> appear in the continuation-list. >> >> point 123.0 456.0 continuation >> >change it to point 123.0 456.0 continuation -text "something" > >Quite easy to do it in plain text editor by search/replace. > >> Also I wonder if the object that contains the continuation >> definition could be listed, ie the scrap or survey (or file name), >> so that edits are easier to locate. >> >> (At present the survey that identifies the physical location is >> listed - regardless of where it's code is defined - and this is >> useful and should be retained) >> >generate map or atlas with next options in layout: > > debug station-names > survey-level 1 > >and you may use the search feature of Acrobat: search >"station_name at survey_name" > >m.s. _______________________________________________ Thanks Martin I have been using both those approaches as work-arounds for some time, but the work-arounds are only of use if you know there is a continuation in your data that has no text associated with it. Ie if you don't actually do the search with the text editor in all your *.th and *.th2 files there are no visual cues. A particular problem if you are checking data created by someone else.
It should be sufficient to export a continuation-list to find this type of anomaly in the input data. Thoughts anyone? Bruce
