> Is it the difference between the two syntax' > mapname [x y] below, and > preview below mapname? > Is one preferred over another?
It is different: > mapname [x y] below, and will generate a map (named mapname) shifted x y and on the original place only "below" preview of mapname will be displayed. > preview below mapname? will generate only the preview, "mapname" will not be displayed. >>I have never thought of displaying also previews in the offset. >>But I can imagine, that in some cases it would be useful. > > Is that not what the m123 example is doing? No, because there the preview is just caused by another offset, not "preview" option in the map. >>Probably best solution would be if preview inheritance could be turned >>on/off by some switch. Would it solve your problems? > > Â Yes, depending on the problems it might cause :) > I am hoping that the preview (very large) extent will be clipped by the > extent of the (smaller) offset passage. OK, I will put it on the TODO list. May be it will not be too complicated... Regards, S.
