Any scrap is "calibrated" see first lines of th2 file. Probably there is a another way.
Odesláno z iPhone 20.9.2010 v 18:26, Andrew Atkinson <andrew at wotcc.org.uk>: > Damn > > Thanks, I had read the wiki, but sort of saw it working without the scale, so > assumed that it was an undocumented feature, and that it took the scale from > the main map some how, as I seem to remember it complaining if it did not > have scale before, or was that only for plans. > > Now my reading of the wiki, and the thbook is that a scale would be needed > for every scrap. > > Okay this seems like a good option, but as most of the time anything in a > single th2 file would be at the same scale, could not a default one be set > for the file, and then over ridden by a scrap scale. As you might have seen I > have lots of cross sections, to scale. > It would be even better if it could take the scale from the plan, or maybe > somehow from the PocketTopo import. Maybe an option for the sections been a a > set multiple of the plan. (but I am not sure if people do this when drawing > in the cave so might be pointless.) But maybe this is not possible, it is > certainly for the future, this print will have to go out as is, guess the > problem is that lost of the poeple looking at the survey next w/e are on the > list so the mistake will jump out at them, now :( > > If I do want to stay up all night and correct this, would the quickest way be > to set the scale in one cross-section scrap and then edit it in the text > editor and copy to all the other cross-section scraps? > > thanks > > Andrew > > > On 20/09/10 12:10, Martin Sluka wrote: >> The cross-sections has no included any stations to calibrate the size as >> map or elevation. Normally you should calibrate them: >> http://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/doku.php?id=tbe:wiki3#cross_sections >> >> Martin >> >> On 19.9.2010, at 23:51, Andrew Atkinson wrote: >> >>> At last a final survey to be printed, well not quite. >>> >>> On closer examination, there seems to be a scale problem with the >>> cross section. Either that or my drawing is really bad. >>> Some of them seem to be twice the scale of the main survey, others >>> seem to be the same. >>> >>> Is there a way to control this and what is the default? >>> >>> I have a horrible feeling that when I have imported from pocket topo, >>> it asks which scale, some I have done at 1:200 but in the end I >>> switched to 1:100, I hope this has not made a difference. >>> >>> You should be able to see what I mean on >>> >>> http://www.ubss.org.uk/__transfer/Charterhouse_basic_survey_small_file.pdf >>> >>> >>> The ones on Route 66 (upper label) Onion Passage, look fine, but the >>> ones on Route 66 (lower label) seem far too large, I have assumed >>> twice scale. >>> >>> Practically out of time this has to go to printing, tomorrow >>> >>> Can I also thank all those on the list that have helped me to get this >>> into production, and especially to those of you doing the coding >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Therion mailing list >>> Therion at speleo.sk >>> http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Therion mailing list >> Therion at speleo.sk >> http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion >> > > _______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > Therion at speleo.sk > http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion
