Sorry: Anyway you may use third method (define area only by border):
Picture On 21.2.2012, at 14:20, Footleg wrote: > My instinct when drawing is to define an area with lines drawn > exactly defining the area, each line starting at the same point as > the last line ends. So I split my wall lines at the points where I > want the area border to join the wall, and drawn border lines > between points on the walls. This looks neater to me. But I realise > that this is not required because you can just overlap the border > lines across the walls to define the area, and any fill will be > clipped by the walls anyway. So what I am wondering is are there any > advantages to one method over the other? See the attached bitmap > illustrating areas defined in the two different ways I just > described. (Left side shows overlapped lines not joined at points. > Right side shows neater area defined exactly by bounding lines.) > > Footleg > < > AreaDefinedTwoWays.png>_______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > Therion at speleo.sk > http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion
