Hello,
i agree, the old behavior of sorting is the one i prefer. Sorry k7xed old
euth new behaviour.
Am 2017-11-08 20:02, schrieb Bruce Mutton via Therion:
I'll just post the image again.
We are dealing with absolute altitudes, height above sea level, here, as
per the established Therion implementation. (I don’t think we can do depth
of cave numbering down from the highest point. Or have I just forgotten?)
On the left is the new development release, which has the altitudes
reported upside down.
On the right is the previous development release, which quite reasonably
has the highest altitudes at the top.
If there is tinkering going on with the altitude legend, then control over
the number of divisions would be desirable. For example I prefer the 6
boxes on the right to the 7 boxes on the left. I can imagine that control
over the number of boxes, from say 3 to 10 would be helpful, so users can
control the look and how much space the altitude legend takes up.
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Therion [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Graham
Mullan via Therion
Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2017 12:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Graham Mullan <[email protected]>
Subject: [Therion] Development 5.4.1+4369eea inverts and recolours
altitude
Are we talking about relative numbers (depth of cave) or absolute numbers
(height above sea level)? The former may run differently to the latter. I
usually use absolute numbers, if at all possible.
Graham
_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
