Many informations and examples according surveying data are in Survex manual. 

Odesláno z iPhonu

10. 5. 2018 v 10:20, Nick Bairstow via Therion <[email protected]>:

> Thanks Bruce very clear examples of surface flags. I now understand their use.
>  
> From: Therion [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce Mutton 
> via Therion
> Sent: 09 May 2018 21:02
> To: 'List for Therion users' <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bruce Mutton <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Therion] Therion Map Header Overrides
>  
> Nick
> Here are some examples of various ‘flags’ usage, for shot flags, not to be 
> confused with station flags.  They are a survey property, not so much a 
> drawing property.
>  
> Approximate and duplicate:
> https://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/extend?s[]=flags#summary_of_all_extend_options_for_survey_centrelines
>  and scroll down to the code below “Creating links between separate caves 
> that are close to each other”.  That one is a bit oddball, not typical usage.
>  
> https://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/metapost?s[]=flags#general_symbol_examples to 
> redefine centrelines to reflect flag states.
>  
> And, um, yes, there is not too much on actual usage examples for flags 
> surface.  Here is a snippet from my last Sunday’s survey efforts.  A short 
> cave that required three ptopo files to adequately capture it.  It is part of 
> a survey loop that goes out of one entrance and into another…
>  
> data normal from to tape compass clino ignoreall
> …
> #following legs are within the cave
> #3.18     3.19        2.099     355.01   -32.84    3.19 entrance rock
> #3.18     3.19        2.098     355.2     -32.67   
> #3.18     3.19        2.098     355.31   -32.69   
> 3.18        3.19        2.098     355.11   -32.73    Calculated leg from 3 
> above
> 3.19        -              0.269     49.83     -12.76   
> 3.19        -              0.588     43.99     45.86    
> 3.19        -              0.714     21.48     76.27    
> …
>  
> flags surface
> #following legs are on the surface
>   # extend right
> #3.19     3.20        2.819     254.97   -14.44    3.21 other entrance rock
> #3.19     3.20        2.818     255.03   -14.34   
> #3.19     3.20        2.819     255.11   -14.33   
> 3.19        3.20        2.819     255.0     -14.37    Calculated leg from 3 
> above
> 3.20        -              0.556     102.47   -59.13   
> 3.20        -              1.045     129.78   5.18       
> #3.20     3.21        6.017     207.42   -12.3     
> #3.20     3.21        6.026     207.53   -12.4     
> #3.20     3.21        6.067     207.48   -12.46   
> 3.20        3.21        6.037     207.47   -12.39    Calculated leg from 3 
> above
>  
> flags not surface
> #following legs are within the cave
> 3.21        -              1.275     43.78     -4.28     
> 3.21        -              2.58        41.32     3.61       
> 3.21        -              2.914     39.54     15.74    
> …
>   # extend left
> #3.21     3.22        3.613     113.19   23.44    
> #3.21     3.22        3.616     113.08   23.59    
> #3.21     3.22        3.609     113.05   23.6        #rename 3.22 as 3.14 to 
> acknowledge loop
> 3.21        3.14        3.613     113.13   23.55     Calculated leg from 3 
> above
> 3.14        -              4.408     324.85   -51.94   
>  
> The survey-list output for this cave looks like…
>  
> Title
> Length
> Depth
> Explored
> Approx.
> Duplicate
> Surface
> Shots
> Stations
> Wairoa Valley Cave, Nelson
> 128
> 10
> 0
> 0
> 3
> 9
> 428
> 431
> 1-Wairoa
> 46
> 7
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 131
> 132
> 2-Upper, Wairoa Cave
> 15
> 3
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 61
> 62
> 3-Downstream, Wairoa Cave
> 67
> 3
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 9
> 235
> 235
>  
> The total survey length (surface + cave + duplicate) is 140m, and 9m of it is 
> on the surface.  There is also 3m of survey in there that is duplicated 
> (happens to be a nosurvey “shot” for a visual-only connection established at 
> the whole-cave level of survey.
>  
> Bruce
>  
> From: Therion <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Nick Bairstow via 
> Therion
> Sent: Thursday, 10 May 2018 3:02 AM
> To: List for Therion users <[email protected]>
> Cc: Nick Bairstow <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Therion] Therion Map Header Overrides
>  
> Bruce, I have never used flags. I have just been though the Therion book and 
> wiki for information but for clarification could you post an example of 
> surface flag use please.  
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> Nick
>  
>  
> From: Therion [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce Mutton 
> via Therion
> Sent: 09 May 2018 11:04
> To: 'List for Therion users' <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bruce Mutton <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Therion] Therion Map Header Overrides
>  
> Nick
> >  The override below is to change the Therion default team, cave length, 
> > cave depth data on the map output. Used in this case because a short 
> > surface survey needed to be shown on the map but the data was skewing the 
> > actual cave length and depth.
>  
> I’m not sure that is a very good way to deal with the issue.
> In the screenshot below I have a surface survey shown (green dots), 
> designated surface by use of ‘flags surface’, ‘flags not surface’ interleaved 
> with the survey data as appropriate.  No need to fudge the cave length or 
> depth because Therion does not include surface data in the cave length. 
> There is some complexity around it, but you can show or hide the cave and 
> surface centrelines using;
>   symbol-show group surface-centreline
>   symbol-hide group cave-centreline
> Bruce
>  
> <image001.jpg>
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Therion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion

Reply via email to