>> segment1@cave1 [100 40 40] >> segmenta@cave2 [100 40 40] >> segmenti@cave3 [100 40 40] >> >> segment2@cave1 [100 70 0] >> segment4@cave1 [100 70 0] >> segmentii@cave3 [100 70 0] >> >> segment3@cave1 [100 100 0] >> segmentb@cave2 [100 100 0] >> segmentiii@cave3 > > And what is the problem define another maps from segments and colour them?
In the simple case I showed above, there would be no problem. But in my actual case, I am doing this: select profilemap1@area ... lookup map:xyz #map within survey, grouping scraps that are in the same plane: [email protected] #whole survey, since the whole cave is in the same plane: [email protected] endlookup I have already split the surveys up into separate maps to show each aligned group. Having to split my overall map up into yet another series of submaps, each of which covers an arbitrary group of maps from several unrelated subsections, is getting really close to spaghetti code. Meanwhile grouping within the lookup would be comparatively clean and easier to understand. _______________________________________________ Therion mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
