Thanks Marco and others for pointing these problems out. So I have another suggestion. Not to implement extend stop, equate, but add the possibility of 3 stations in extend ignore. I.e.
extend ignore <s1> <s2> <s3> would mean, do not go to s3 if you came to s2 from s1. In your case Tarquin, specifying extend ignore 8 7 11 extend ignore 6 7 12 should save the situation. Am I still missing something? S. On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 23:15, Stacho Mudrak <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Marco, Tarquin for pointing this out. > > So I have another suggestion. Not to implement extend stop, but add the > possibility of 3 stations in extend ignore. > > extend ignore <s1> <s2> <s3> > > would mean, do not go to s3 if you came to s2 from s1. In your case > Tarquin, specifying > > extend ignore 8 7 11 > extend ignore 6 7 12 > > should save the situation. Am I missing something? > > S. > > On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 22:40, Tarquin Wilton-Jones via Therion < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > Something important I had not considered. I wonder what it does to >> tarquin's example. >> >> I don't even begin to know how to cope with the situation where there is >> a separate branch from 7 to 12 in my example, where you want >> 2-10-9-8-7-12 to be shown as one branch in the extended elevation, and >> 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-11 in the other branch, with two station 7s. >> >> At that point, I think the only way to cope with it is to say: >> >> 7 7a 0 0 0 >> 7a 8 1 2 3 >> ... >> 7a 12 1 2 3 >> extend ignore 7-7a >> >> Manipulate the data to add an extra station, allowing a break. >> >> I also don't think this discussion of "extend stop 8 7" can cope with it >> either. >> >> I sense a large spanner in the works... >> >> >> Tarquin >> _______________________________________________ >> Therion mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion >> >
_______________________________________________ Therion mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
